Delayed
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
0.54 HKD | -6.90% | +77.05% | -16.92% |
29/04 | Chinese Property Shares Jump After Major City Removes Home-Buying Curbs | DJ |
29/04 | Chinese property shares rally on stimulus policy hopes | RE |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
Strengths
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- For the last 4 months, the company has been enjoying highly positive EPS revisions, which were frequently and significantly raised.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company's profitability before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization characterizes fragile margins.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- The company is in a hindered financial situation with significant debt and rather low EBITDA levels.
- The company's "enterprise value to sales" ratio is among the highest in the world.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- Revenue estimates are regularly revised downwards for the current and coming years.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- Most analysts agree on a negative opinion with regard to the stock. Indeed, the average consensus issues recommendations to underperform or sell.
- The three month average target prices set by analysts do not offer high potential in comparison with the current prices.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- The company's earnings releases usually do not meet expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Real Estate Development & Operations
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-16.92% | 281M | B- | ||
+40.41% | 29.49B | B- | ||
-11.66% | 27.43B | B | ||
+22.25% | 26.59B | A- | ||
+7.14% | 27.14B | B- | ||
+49.25% | 23.87B | A- | ||
+13.08% | 21.03B | A | ||
-0.25% | 19.01B | B- | ||
+28.90% | 16.66B | B | ||
-13.52% | 15.27B | B+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- 813 Stock
- Ratings Shimao Group Holdings Limited