Statement 1087 Compliance Assessment Report
BHP NICKEL WEST
Mt Keith Satellite
Statement 1087
Compliance
Assessment
Report
BHP Nickel West
29 March 2022
1
Statement 1087 Compliance Assessment Report
BHP NICKEL WEST
Contents
Document Amendment Record | 3 | |
Endorsement | 3 | |
Executive Summary | 4 | |
1. | Introduction | 5 |
2. | Purpose and Scope | 5 |
3. | Project and Status | 6 |
4. | Statement of Compliance | 6 |
5. | Proposed Changes to the Compliance Assessment | |
Plan | 13 | |
6. | References | 14 |
Appendix 1 - Statement of Compliance | 16 |
Appendix 2 - MKS Water Meter Readings - Abstraction17
Appendix 3 | - Stantec (2022) Mt Keith Satellite 2021 Flora | |
and Vegetation Monitoring Report | 19 | |
Appendix 4 | - Astron (2022) Mt Keith Vegetation Remote | |
Sensing Analysis 2021 | 20 | |
Appendix 5 | - Hydrological Processes EMP | 21 |
Appendix 6 | - Mt Keith Satellite Mine Closure Plan 201924 | |
2
Statement 1087 Compliance Assessment Report
BHP NICKEL WEST
Document Amendment Record
Version | Page No. | Version | Key Changes | Date |
Description | ||||
1 | - | Draft for Internal | - | 22 March 2022 |
Review (BHP Nickel | ||||
West HSEC) | ||||
2 | - | Draft for BHP | - | 29 March 2022 |
Approval (BHP | ||||
Nickel West HSEC) | ||||
0 | - | Final for BHP issue | - | 29 March 2022 |
to EPA (BHP Nickel | ||||
West HSEC) | ||||
Endorsement
I have reviewed this Compliance Assessment Report prepared to meet the requirements of Condition 4-6 of the Statement 1087 approval for the Mt Keith Satellite Project, and accept that the information provided is an accurate account of the activities undertaken during the reporting period.
Michael Moscarda
A / General Manager Northern Operations
BHP Nickel West Pty Ltd
3
Statement 1087 Compliance Assessment Report
BHP NICKEL WEST
Executive Summary
BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd (BHP Nickel West) was granted environmental approval of the Mt Keith Satellite Project (the 'Project') in December 2018 by the Western Australian Minister for Environment in accordance with Section 45(5) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA).
Works on the Project commenced in February 2019, which to date have included the clearing and establishment of the initial operating areas (Haul Road, Mine Pits, Waste Rock Landform and Mine Ore Pad) and the commencement of productive mining of ore from both the Six Mile Well Mine Pit and the Goliath Mine Pit. Implementation of the Project is currently expected to continue until approximately 2030+.
Condition 4-6 of the Statement 1087 approval requires BHP Nickel West to submit an annual Compliance Assessment Report which outlines the status of implementation of the Project and compliance with the approval conditions. This Report outlines the implementation status and compliance for the Project covering the period of 28 December 2020 to 31 December 2021. BHP Nickel West was in compliance with all conditions of the Statement 1087 approval during the reporting period.
4
Statement 1087 Compliance Assessment Report
BHP NICKEL WEST
1. Introduction
The Mt Keith Satellite Project (the 'Project') is for a satellite mining operation as an extension to the existing Mt Keith Nickel Mine1. The Project comprises two Mine Pits, a Waste Rock Landform, Support Infrastructure and a Haul Road, requiring the clearing of up to 1,069 hectares (ha) of native vegetation within a Development Envelope of 1,265 ha, as identified by Figure 1 Project Area.
BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd (BHP Nickel West) referred the Project to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) in May 2017 in accordance with Section 38 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA)
(BHP Nickel West 2017). The EPA (2017) determined the Project required an environmental assessment, with the key assessment factors including 'Flora and Vegetation', 'Inland Waters', 'Social Surroundings' (Aboriginal Heritage) and 'Air Quality'. An 'Environmental Review' document (Environmental Impact Assessment) assessing the potential environmental effects of the Project was additionally prepared to assist the EPA assessment (BHP Nickel West 2018a).
The EPA (2018) assessment concluded the Project could be implemented subject to recommended conditions to ensure the potential environmental effects of the Project were appropriately managed. Following the advice of the EPA (2018), the Project was subsequently approved by the WA Minister for Environment (2018) through the Statement 1087 approval granted in accordance with Section 45(5) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA).
Implementation of the Project commenced in February 2019, which to date has included the clearing and establishment of the initial operating areas (Haul Road, Mine Pits, Waste Rock Landform and Mine Ore Pad) and the continuation of productive ore mining from both the Six Mile Well Mine Pit and the Goliath Mine Pit.
Implementation of the Project is expected to occur over a period of 10+ years, with the cessation of mining (and the commencement of mine closure) estimated to occur from approximately 2030+.
2. Purpose and Scope
Condition 4-6 of the Statement 1087 approvals requires the submission of an annual Compliance Assessment Report (CAR) document, which outlines the status of implementation of the Project and compliance with the approval conditions.
This CAR outlines the implementation and compliance status of the Project for the period of 28 December 2020 to 31 December 2021, and aligns with the requirements of the approved Compliance Assessment Plan
(BHP Nickel West 2020a) under Condition 4-1 of the Statement 1087 approval.
This CAR document is the third CAR document to be submitted for the Project under the Statement 1087 approval, following from the CAR documents submitted in 2020 and 2021 (BHP Nickel West 2020b and BHP Nickel West 2021c).
1 Note: The Mt Keith Nickel Mine commenced operations in 1993. The existing components of the Mt Keith Nickel Mine do not form part of the approved Project, and accordingly, are not addressed within this CAR document.
5
Statement 1087 Compliance Assessment Report
BHP NICKEL WEST
3. Project and Status
BHP Nickel West commenced implementation of the Project in February 2019. To date, implementation of the Project has included:
- Clearing and establishment of the initial operating areas (Haul Road, Mine Pits, Waste Rock Landform and Run of Mine Pad); and
- Continuation of productive mining of ore from both the Six Mile Well Mine Pit and commencement of mining from the Goliath Mine Pit.
- Ore supplied from the Project is now the primary product processed at the Mt Keith Nickel Mine.
Implementation of the Project is expected to occur over a period of 10+ years, with the cessation of mining (and the commencement of mine closure) estimated to occur from approximately 2030+.
4. Statement of Compliance
A completed Audit Table (consistent with the approved Compliance Assessment Plan (BHP Nickel West 2020a)) is provided below to outline compliance with the conditions of the Statement 1087 approval. The Audit Table verifies that BHP Nickel West was in compliance with all conditions of the Statement 1087 approval during the reporting period. Refer to Table 1 Mt Keith Satellite Operations Audit Table.
A completed and signed Statement of Compliance form (prepared using the DWER (2018) form 'PAF2 - Statement of Compliance - 2018') is provided at Appendix 1.
6
BHP NICKEL WEST | Statement 1087 Compliance Assessment Report |
AUDIT TABLE
Mt Keith Satellite Project, Statement No.1087
- Phases that apply in this table = Pre-Construction, Construction, Operation, Decommissioning, Overall (several phases).
- This audit table is a summary and timetable of conditions and commitments applying to this project. Refer to the Minister's Statement for full detail/precise wording of individual elements.
- Code prefixes: M = Implementation condition; P = Proponent's commitment; N = Procedure.
- Compliance status: C = Compliant, CLD = Completed, NC = Non-compliant, NR = Not required at this stage. Please note terms NA = Not Audited and VR = Verification Required are only for EPA use. IP = In Process may only be used by the proponent in circumstances outlined in Section 2.8 of the Post Assessment Guideline for Preparing an Audit Table.
Table 1: Mt Keith Satellite Operation Audit Table (28 December 2020 to 31 December 2021).
AUDIT | SUBJECT | REQUIREMENT | HOW | EVIDENCE | PHASE | TIMEFRAME | STATUS | FURTHER INFORMATION | |
CODE | |||||||||
1087:M1.1 | Proposal | When implementing the proposal, the | Implement the Project | Compliance | Overall | For the life of the | COMPLIANT | Table 2 of Schedule 1 of the Statement 1087 approval, as amended by | |
Implementation | proponent shall not exceed the authorised | in accordance with | Assessment Reports. | Proposal. | Attachment 1 to the Statement 1087 approval under s45C in | ||||
extent of the proposal as defined in Table | criteria outlined in | September 2020, authorises the clearing of up to 1,069 hectares (ha) of | |||||||
2 of Schedule 1, unless amendments to | Schedule 1. | native vegetation within a 1,265 ha Development Envelope. As of 31st | |||||||
the proposal and the authorised extent of | December 2021, a total of 805.3 ha of native vegetation has been | ||||||||
the proposal have been approved under | cleared within the Development Envelope; being within the total 1,069 ha | ||||||||
the EP Act. | authorised limit. No clearing of native vegetation beyond the | ||||||||
Development Envelope has been undertaken for the Project. The area | |||||||||
of native vegetation clearing undertaken to date, and the extent of the | |||||||||
approved Development Envelope, is identified at Figure 2. | |||||||||
Table 2 of Schedule 1 of the Statement 1087 approval authorises | |||||||||
groundwater abstraction (mine pit dewatering) of up to 0.4 gigalitres (GL) | |||||||||
per year (y) using bores and pit sumps. A total of 0.206 GL (206,173 | |||||||||
kilolitres (kL)) of groundwater was abstracted between 1st January 2021 | |||||||||
and 31st December 2021; being within the 0.4 GL/y authorised limit. | |||||||||
Groundwater abstractions records to verify the mine pit dewatering | |||||||||
volumes from each bore/sump is provided in Appendix 2. | |||||||||
1087:M2.1 | Contact Details | The proponent shall notify the CEO of any | Notify the CEO of any | Written notification to | Overall | Within 28 days of such | NOT REQUIRED | No change to the Proponent name, physical address or postal address | |
change of its name, physical address or | change in proponent | the CEO of any | change. | has occurred during the reporting period, and accordingly, no notification | |||||
postal address for the serving of notices | details. | change in proponent | to the DWER CEO has been required. | ||||||
or other correspondence within twenty- | details. | ||||||||
eight (28) days of such change. Where | |||||||||
the proponent is a corporation or an | |||||||||
association of persons, whether | |||||||||
incorporated or not, the postal address is | |||||||||
that of the principal place of business or of | |||||||||
the principal office in the State. | |||||||||
1087:M3.1 | Time Limit for | The proponent shall not commence | Notify the CEO | Written notification to | Overall | After 28 December | COMPLETED | Implementation of the Project commenced in February 2019 with the | |
Proposal | implementation of the proposal after five | advising proposal has | the CEO. | 2023. | construction and operation of the Project. Implementation of the Project | ||||
Implementation | (5) years from the date on this Statement, | not commenced | is considered to be 'substantial'. Compliance with Condition 3-1 is now | ||||||
and any commencement, prior to this | implementation. | completed. | |||||||
date, must be substantial. | |||||||||
1087:M3.2 | Time Limit for | Any commencement of implementation of | N/A. | Compliance | Overall | Within 5 years from | COMPLETED | Implementation of the Project commenced in February 2019 with the | |
Proposal | the proposal, on or before five (5) years | Assessment Reports. | the date of Statement | construction and operation of the Project. Implementation of the Project | |||||
Implementation | from the date of this Statement, must be | 1087, being on or | is considered to be 'substantial'. Written evidence demonstrating | ||||||
demonstrated as substantial by providing | before 28 December | compliance was confirmed in the DWER Compliance Audit Report in | |||||||
the CEO with written evidence, on or | 2023. | May 2020. Compliance with Condition 3-2 is now completed. | |||||||
before the expiration of five (5) years from | |||||||||
the date of this Statement. | |||||||||
1087:M4.1 | Compliance | The proponent shall prepare, and | Submit Compliance | Compliance | Pre-construction | At least six (6) months | COMPLIANT | A Compliance Assessment Plan (CAP) document | |
Reporting | maintain a Compliance Assessment Plan | Assessment Plan to | Assessment Plan (this | prior to the first | (BHP Nickel West 2019a) was initially submitted to the DWER CEO in | ||||
which is submitted to the CEO at least six | the CEO. | document). | Compliance | September 2019, with the DWER CEO granting initial approval of | |||||
(6) months prior to the first Compliance | Assessment Report | the CAP document in October 2019. | |||||||
Assessment Report required by condition | required by condition | ||||||||
4-6, or prior to implementation of the | 4-6, or prior to | The current version of the CAP document (Revision 2, | |||||||
proposal, whichever is sooner. | implementation of the | BHP Nickel West 2020a) was approved by the DWER CEO in | |||||||
October 2020 (DWER 2020b). | |||||||||
March 2022 | 7 |
BHP NICKEL WEST | Statement 1087 Compliance Assessment Report | |||||||||
AUDIT | SUBJECT | REQUIREMENT | HOW | EVIDENCE | PHASE | TIMEFRAME | STATUS | FURTHER INFORMATION | ||
CODE | ||||||||||
proposal, whichever is | ||||||||||
sooner. | BHP Nickel West will continue to review and maintain the CAP | |||||||||
document, as required from time to time, to ensure ongoing compliance | ||||||||||
with Condition 4-1. | ||||||||||
1087:M4.2 | Compliance | The Compliance Assessment Plan shall | Submit Compliance | Compliance | Pre-construction | At least six (6) months | COMPLIANT | A Compliance Assessment Plan (CAP) document | ||
Reporting | indicate: | Assessment Plan to | Assessment Plan (this | prior to the first | (BHP Nickel West 2019a) was initially submitted to the DWER CEO in | |||||
(1) the frequency of compliance reporting; | the CEO. | document). | Compliance | September 2019, with the DWER CEO granting initial approval of | ||||||
(2) the approach and timing of compliance | Assessment Report | the CAP document in October 2019. | ||||||||
assessments; | required by condition | |||||||||
(3) the retention of compliance | 4-6, or prior to | The current version of the CAP document (Revision 2, | ||||||||
assessments; | implementation of the | BHP Nickel West 2020a) was approved by the DWER CEO in | ||||||||
(4) the method of reporting of potential | proposal, whichever is | October 2020 (DWER 2020b). | ||||||||
non-compliances and corrective actions | sooner. | |||||||||
taken; | In accordance with Condition 4-2, the approved CAP document | |||||||||
(5) the table of contents of Compliance | identifies: | |||||||||
Assessment Reports; and | ∙ frequency of compliance reporting; | |||||||||
(6) public availability of Compliance | ||||||||||
∙ approach and timing of compliance assessments; | ||||||||||
Assessment Reports. | ||||||||||
∙ retention of compliance assessments; | ||||||||||
∙ method of reporting of potential non-compliances and corrective | ||||||||||
actions taken; | ||||||||||
∙ table of contents of Compliance Assessment Reports; and | ||||||||||
∙ public availability of Compliance Assessment Reports. | ||||||||||
BHP Nickel West remains in compliance with the requirements of | ||||||||||
Condition 4-2. | ||||||||||
1087:M4.3 | Compliance | After receiving notice in writing from the | Implementation of | Notice in writing from | Overall | Ongoing as per | COMPLIANT | This Compliance Assessment Report (CAR) document submitted to | ||
Reporting | CEO that the Compliance Assessment | Compliance | the CEO and | requirements of CAP. | DWER in 2021 provides an assessment of compliance with the | |||||
Plan satisfies the requirements of | Assessment Plan. | Compliance | conditions of the Statement 1087 approval consistent with the approved | |||||||
condition 4-2 the proponent shall assess | Assessment Reports. | CAP document. Annual submission of this CAR document ensures that | ||||||||
compliance with conditions in accordance | BHP Nickel West remains in compliance with the requirements | |||||||||
with the Compliance Assessment Plan | of Condition 4-2. | |||||||||
required by condition 4-1. | ||||||||||
1087:M4.4 | Compliance | The proponent shall retain reports of all | Retain records in | Written response to | Overall | When requested by | COMPLIANT | Submitted CAR documents will be retained by BHP Nickel West for the | ||
Reporting | compliance assessments described in the | accordance with | request by CEO. | CEO. | duration of the Project in accordance with standard document control | |||||
Compliance Assessment Plan required by | Compliance | practices, as outlined within the approved CAP document. | ||||||||
condition 4-1 and shall make those | Assessment Plan. | |||||||||
reports available when requested by the | No requests were received from the DWER CEO during the reporting | |||||||||
CEO. | period to make additional copies of the submitted CAR documents | |||||||||
available. | ||||||||||
1087:M4.5 | Compliance | The proponent shall advise the CEO of | Notification of the | Written | Overall | Within 7 days of the | COMPLIANT | Nil potential non-compliance items were identified, or required reporting | ||
Reporting | any potential non-compliance within | CEO via an email to | correspondence to | potential non- | to DWER, during the reporting period. | |||||
seven (7) days of that non-compliance | compliance@dwer.wa. | CEO. | compliance being | |||||||
being known. | gov.au | known. | BHP Nickel West has not been required to provide advice to the DWER | |||||||
which will include any | CEO of any potential non-compliance during the reporting period. | |||||||||
corrective actions | ||||||||||
taken to address the | ||||||||||
potential non- | ||||||||||
compliance. | ||||||||||
1087:M4.6.1 | Compliance | The proponent shall submit to the CEO | Submit Compliance | Compliance | Overall | The first report to be | COMPLIANT | The first CAR document (BHP Nickel West 2020b) was submitted to the | ||
Reporting | the first Compliance Assessment Report | Assessment to the | Assessment Reports. | submitted by 28 | DWER CEO in March 2020 addressing compliance with the conditions | |||||
fifteen (15) months from the date of issue | CEO. | March 2020 and from | for the first 12 month period following the granting of the Statement 1087 | |||||||
of this Statement addressing the twelve | then on annual by 28 | approval. This CAR document presents the third report addressing | ||||||||
(12) month period from the date of issue | March each year. | compliance with the conditions of the Statement 1087 approval. | ||||||||
of this Statement and then annually from | ||||||||||
the date of submission of the first | As outlined in Section 5 Proposed Changes to the Compliance | |||||||||
Compliance Assessment Report, or as | Assessment Plan, in 2020 BHP Nickel West proposed that future CAR | |||||||||
otherwise agreed in writing by the CEO. | documents cover the financial year period 1 July to 30 June, with | |||||||||
March 2022 | 8 |
BHP NICKEL WEST | Statement 1087 Compliance Assessment Report | ||||||||||
AUDIT | SUBJECT | REQUIREMENT | HOW | EVIDENCE | PHASE | TIMEFRAME | STATUS | FURTHER INFORMATION | |||
CODE | |||||||||||
submission by 30 October (to align to other standard Government | |||||||||||
financial year reporting requirements). The request for agreement of the | |||||||||||
DWER CEO for this change was provided as part of the 2020 CAR | |||||||||||
submission (Section 5). No response from the DWER CEO has been | |||||||||||
received to this request. In the absence of a response BHP Nickel West | |||||||||||
continues to comply with a March submission date for the CAR | |||||||||||
1087:M4.6.2 | Compliance | The Compliance Assessment Report | Compliance | Compliance | Overall | The first report to be | COMPLIANT | This CAR complies with reporting requirements, specifically: | |||
Reporting | shall: | Assessment Report | Assessment Reports. | submitted by 28 | 1. Endorsement by the General Manager of BHP Nickel West, as an | ||||||
(1) be endorsed by the proponent's Chief | developed in | March 2020 and from | authorised delegate of the CEO of BHP Nickel West. | ||||||||
Executive Officer or a person delegated to | accordance with the | then on annual by 28 | |||||||||
sign on the Chief Executive Officer's | approved Compliance | March each year. | 2. BHP Nickel West has complied with all conditions of the | ||||||||
behalf; | Assessment Plan. | Statement 1087 approval during the reporting period. Statements to | |||||||||
(2) include a statement as to whether the | this effect are included within this CAR document. | ||||||||||
proponent has complied with the | |||||||||||
conditions; | 3. Nil potential non-compliances with the conditions of the | ||||||||||
(3) identify all potential non-compliances | Statement 1087 approval occurred during the reporting period. | ||||||||||
and describe corrective and preventative | Accordingly, no corrective or preventative actions have been | ||||||||||
actions taken; | required to address potential non-compliances. | ||||||||||
(4) be made publicly available in | |||||||||||
accordance with the approved | 4. Following approval of this CAR document by the DWER CEO, this | ||||||||||
Compliance | CAR document will be made publicly available through the | ||||||||||
Assessment Plan; and | BHP Nickel West website as outlined by the approved CAP report | ||||||||||
(5) indicate any proposed changes to the | (refer to https://www.bhp.com/sustainability/environment/regulatory- | ||||||||||
Compliance Assessment Plan required by | information/). | ||||||||||
condition 4-1. | |||||||||||
5. Proposed changes to the CAP document are outlined in | |||||||||||
Section 5 Proposed Changes to the Compliance Assessment Plan. | |||||||||||
1087:M5.1 | Public Availability | Subject to condition 5-2, within a | To be determined in | Written advice from | Overall | To be determined in | COMPLIANT | Environmental data, management plans and reports relevant to the EPA | |||
of Data | reasonable time period approved by the | consultation with | CEO confirming | consultation with the | assessment of the Project are publicly available through the EPA | ||||||
CEO of the issue of this Statement and for | CEO. | manner approved. | CEO. | website (refer tohttps://www.epa.wa.gov.au/proposals/mt-keith-satellite- | |||||||
the remainder of the life of the proposal | project). This public availability of the Project assessment information is | ||||||||||
the proponent shall make publicly | considered to be appropriate, with further actions for the public | ||||||||||
available, in a manner approved by the | availability of the assessment information by BHP Nickel West not | ||||||||||
CEO, all validated environmental data | considered to be considered necessary. | ||||||||||
(including sampling design, sampling | |||||||||||
methodologies, empirical data and | Environmental data, management plans and reports relevant to the | ||||||||||
derived information products (e.g. maps)) | implementation of the Statement 1087 approval are publicly available | ||||||||||
management plans and reports relevant | through the BHP website (refer to | ||||||||||
to the assessment of this proposal and | https://www.bhp.com/sustainability/environment/regulatory-information/). | ||||||||||
implementation of this Statement. | To date, this publicly available information includes: | ||||||||||
∙ Flora and Vegetation Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Rec | |||||||||||
0.2 (BHP Nickel West 2019); | |||||||||||
∙ Compliance Assessment Plan (BHP Nickel West 2020a); | |||||||||||
∙ Compliance Assessment Report 2019 (BHP Nickel West 2020b) | |||||||||||
and | |||||||||||
∙ Compliance Assessment report 2020. | |||||||||||
Following approval by the DWER CEO, this CAR document will | |||||||||||
additionally be made publicly available through the BHP website. | |||||||||||
To note, the DWER CEO has not provided written advice to | |||||||||||
BHP Nickel West on the approved manner or the timing for the public | |||||||||||
availability of information required under Condition 5-1 of the | |||||||||||
Statement 1087 approval. BHP Nickel West consider the above actions | |||||||||||
for public availability to meet the intent of Condition 5-1 and the | |||||||||||
objectives of the DWER CEO for the public availability of environmental | |||||||||||
data, management plans and reports. | |||||||||||
1087:M5.2 | Public Availability | If any data referred to in condition 5-1 | Proponent request to | Notice in writing to | Overall | As required from time | NOT REQUIRED | No requests were made by BHP Nickel West to the CEO DWER to not | |||
of Data | contains particulars of: | CEO to not make | CEO notifying of any | to time. | make environmental data publicly available during the reporting period. | ||||||
March 2022 | 9 |
BHP NICKEL WEST | Statement 1087 Compliance Assessment Report | |||||||||
AUDIT | SUBJECT | REQUIREMENT | HOW | EVIDENCE | PHASE | TIMEFRAME | STATUS | FURTHER INFORMATION | ||
CODE | ||||||||||
(1) a secret formula or process; or | certain data publicly | information not to be | ||||||||
(2) confidential commercially sensitive | available, including | made publicly | Consistent with standard practices, BHP Nickel West will seek to ensure | |||||||
information; the proponent may submit a | explanation and | available. | public availability of all environmental data which relates to the | |||||||
request for approval from the CEO to not | reason why. | implementation of, and compliance with, the Statement 1087 approval. | ||||||||
make these data publicly available. In | ||||||||||
making such a request the proponent | ||||||||||
shall provide the CEO with an explanation | ||||||||||
and reasons why the data should not be | ||||||||||
made publicly available. | ||||||||||
1087:M6.1 | Flora and | The proponent shall implement the | Implement the | MKS FVEMP. | Overall | The first report to be | COMPLIANT | BHP Nickel West has implemented the Project to avoid and minimise, | ||
Vegetation | proposal to meet the following | proposal in | submitted by 28 | where possible, indirect effects to DBCA-classified 'priority' flora taxa, | ||||||
Management Plan | environmental objective: | accordance with the | Compliance | March 2020 and from | the Violet Range 'priority' ecological community and the adjacent | |||||
(1) Avoid, where possible, and minimise | Flora and Vegetation | Assessment Reports. | then on annual by 28 | 'Class A' Wanjarri Nature Reserve. The avoidance / minimisation | ||||||
indirect impacts as far as practicable to | Environmental | March each year. | measures have been implemented through the Flora and Vegetation | |||||||
Priority flora, the Violet Range PEC and | Management Plan | EMP (BHP Nickel West 2019b) (as described below under | ||||||||
the Wanjarri Nature Reserve. | (FVEMP). | Condition 6-3). | ||||||||
1087:M6.2 | Flora and | In order to meet the requirements of | Implement the | MKS FVEMP | Overall | Throughout the life of | NOT REQUIRED | The Flora and Vegetation EMP dated December 2019 (Revision 0.2) | ||
Vegetation | condition 6-1, the proponent shall | proposal in | the Project. | was prepared in accordance with Condition 6-3 (below). Accordingly, | ||||||
Management Plan | implement the Flora and Vegetation | accordance with the | Compliance | implementation of the previous revision of the Flora and Vegetation EMP | ||||||
Environmental Management Plan | FVEMP. | Assessment Reports. | Annual compliance | under Condition 6-2 is no longer required, with implementation of the | ||||||
(Version 0, September 2018). | assessment reporting | revised/approved Flora and Vegetation EMP to be regulated in | ||||||||
commencing 28 | accordance with Condition 6-3 (as addressed below). | |||||||||
March 2020. | ||||||||||
1087:M6.3 | Flora and | The proponent shall implement the most | Implement the current | Written notice from | Overall | Throughout the life of | COMPLIANT | The current revision of the Flora and Vegetation EMP (BHP Nickel | ||
Vegetation | recent version of the Flora and Vegetation | and most recent | CEO confirming the | the Project. | West 2019b, Revision 0.2) was approved by the DWER CEO in | |||||
Management Plan | Environmental Management Plan which | version of the FVEMP. | FVEMP addresses | February 2021 (DWER 2021). | ||||||
the CEO has confirmed by notice in | condition 6-1, on | Annual compliance | ||||||||
writing, addresses the requirements of | advice from DBCA. | assessment reporting | Consistent with the approved Flora and Vegetation EMP, the | |||||||
condition 6-1, on advice of the | commencing 28 | environmental management actions implemented to minimise the direct | ||||||||
Department of Biodiversity, Conservation | Compliance | March 2020. | and potential indirect effects of the Project to flora and vegetation values | |||||||
and Attractions. | Assessment Reports | has included: | ||||||||
∙ Implementation of the Environmental Heritage Impact Assessment | ||||||||||
process (internal process) prior to land disturbance (control of | ||||||||||
direct effects). | ||||||||||
∙ Environmental monitoring within pre-defined quadrats for: | ||||||||||
o DBCA-classified 'priority' native flora taxa (tagged individuals); | ||||||||||
o vegetation communities; and | ||||||||||
o introduced flora taxa (weeds) | ||||||||||
at defined monitoring sites located in close proximity to Project and | ||||||||||
distant from the Project (control sites). | ||||||||||
∙ Hygiene inspections of equipment and vehicles to minimise the risk | ||||||||||
of introduction of introduced flora taxa (weeds), with targeted spray | ||||||||||
control for any identified infestations. | ||||||||||
The key environmental outcomes from the implementation of the | ||||||||||
management actions in the Flora and Vegetation EMP has notably | ||||||||||
included: | ||||||||||
∙ All clearing of native vegetation for the Project has occurred within | ||||||||||
the authorised Development Envelope (spatial area), and within the | ||||||||||
total authorised clearing limit (area in hectares); | ||||||||||
∙ Maintenance of plant health condition of tagged DBCA-classified | ||||||||||
'priority' flora taxa adjacent to the Project (compared to control | ||||||||||
sites); | ||||||||||
∙ No measurable effect to vegetation condition in proximity to the | ||||||||||
Project (including for the Violet Range 'priority' ecological | ||||||||||
community and the adjacent 'Class A' Wanjarri Nature Reserve), | ||||||||||
with no measured exceedance of trigger criteria or threshold | ||||||||||
criteria; and | ||||||||||
March 2022 | 10 |
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
BHP Group Limited published this content on 30 May 2024 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 30 May 2024 05:39:10 UTC.