OVERVIEW
Legislation
-
The last of the temporary measures introduced by the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 to help protect companies affected by lockdown restrictions during the Covid pandemic, including the general moratorium on commercial evictions, have expired.
- The Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 has entered into force. The Act provides a temporary ringfence for certain outstanding commercial rent debts related to the Covid pandemic and establishes a binding arbitration process to resolve rent disputes that cannot be settled by agreement.
- Following the
July 2021 Reforming Competition and Consumer Policy consultation, theUK Government has presented proposals toParliament for the reform of theUK competition and consumer protection regimes. The proposals include amendments to the Package and Travel Arrangement Regulations 2018 to allow better flexibility for insolvency protection for non-flight packages, and better protection for pre-paying customers of suppliers of goods and services which become insolvent, includingChristmas Savings Clubs and similar savings schemes not covered by existing financial protections. - The Insolvency Service has published its first five-yearly report on the operation of the Insolvency (
England andWales ) Rules 2016. The report concludes that the Rules as a whole are operating correctly and that they are achieving the goals that were set for them. It also identifies a number of issues requiring attention, including the Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation process and the scope of insolvency applications. - The jurisdiction of the
High Court to entertain a bankruptcy petition against a debtor is governed by section 265 of the Insolvency Act 1996. One of the grounds of jurisdiction is that the debtor has a "place of residence" inEngland andWales . In HRHPrince Hussam Bin Saud Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud v Mobile Telecommunications Company KSCP [2022] EWHC 744 (Ch), Roth J had to consider the meaning of that expression. He held (rather unhelpfully from a practitioner's perspective) that the issue was one of fact and degree, which might involve a broad range of factual considerations; and he rejected the suggestion that de facto control of the property was a necessary condition in every case. - Section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 provides that, in a winding up by the court, any disposition of company property made after the commencement of the winding up is void unless the court orders otherwise - a discretionary remedy known as validating the disposition. Liquidators are entitled to bring proceedings on behalf of the company to recover company property from a person who received it pursuant to a void disposition. There are conflicting authorities on whether a defence of change of position is available in such a case. In Rose v
AIB Group (UK) plc [2003] 1 WLR 2791,Nicholas Warren QC stated that the defence was available in section 127 cases, as in any other claim for restitution. However, in the later case ofRe MKG Convenience Ltd (in liquidation) [2019] EWHC 1383 (Ch), HHJ David Cooke concluded that, while the defence was available in principle, the circumstances in which it could succeed were constrained in the same way and for the same reasons as the exercise of the court's discretion to validate. The point arose again before ICCJudge Barber inRe Changtel Solutions UK Ltd (in liquidation) [2022] EWHC 694 (Ch). She held thatMKG Convenience Ltd was to be preferred to Rose, and that, in the absence of circumstances which could justify validation, the defence of change of position must also fail. Denaxe Ltd v Cooper [2022] EWHC 764 (Ch) is the latest chapter in the long-running legal battle between the former owners ofBlackpool Football Club , which resulted in a 2017 judgment for Ł31 million against Denaxe andOwen Oyston . The court appointed receivers to sell Denaxe's assets by way of equitable execution in order to satisfy that judgment debt. Denaxe then brought a claim for damages against the receivers for failure to use reasonable endeavours to achieve the best price obtainable in the market. Fancourt J struck out the claim against the receivers, holding that they were entitled to immunity from such claims, the same as trustees and administrators.- Section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986, entitled "Summary remedy against delinquent directors, liquidators, etc" permits the court, in its discretion, to order a director who has misapplied property of a company which is being wound up to restore the property. In
Re Glam and Tan Ltd [2022] EWHC 855 (Ch), Chief Insolvency and Companies CourtJudge Briggs had to consider whether to hold the sole director of an insolvent company personally liable under s 212 for online transfers and cash payments of company money to her violent and controlling estranged husband. He held that it was unjust to do so, in circumstances where her free will had been subjugated to her husband's will under threat of violence.
Sanctions
-
The
Caselaw
-
In
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Mr
Quadrant Chambers
Quadrant House
EC4Y 1AU
Tel: 207583 4444
Fax: 207583 4455
E-mail: marketing@quadrantchambers.com
URL: www.quadrantchambers.com
© Mondaq Ltd, 2022 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source