EnviroMetal Technologies Inc. reiterate the following results of an extensive formula reusability test and a series of comparative tests on the EnviroMetal formula and process versus sodium cyanide ("Cyanide" or "NaCN"). The research work was performed by EnviroMetal at their research lab located in Burnaby and by SGS at their Burnaby multi-lab. The tests were performed as part of continued collaboration between the Company and several development and production stage gold miners. The comparative tests were designed to compare the leach efficiency and gold recoveries of EnviroMetal's proprietary eco-friendly lixiviant to that of Cyanide. Tests using EnviroMetal's lixiviant were conducted at the Company's Burnaby lab and tests using Cyanide solution were conducted by SGS in their lab. Tests were performed using two separate samples of high-grade mineralized material from a Canadian gold mine: high grade ore with an assay grade of 675 grams per tonne ("g/t") gold; and flotation concentrates with an assay grade of 55.1 g/t gold. For both materials 24 hour leach tests were performed using both medium and high concentrations EnviroMetal's lixiviant and 1 gram per litre ("g/L") and 5 g/L Cyanide concentrations. In tests conducted on the high-grade ore sample, the EnviroMetal lixiviant, in both medium and high concentrations, significantly outperformed Cyanide over the 24-hour test. The tests on the high-grade ore sample showed the most favorable results with the EnviroMetal formula attaining gold recoveries of over 99% in under 6 hours compared to Cyanide which attained recoveries of 94% in 24 hours. The tests on flotation concentrate resulted in high gold recoveries of over 92.5% using EnviroMetal's lixiviant in 6 hours. Similar recoveries were achieved using Cyanide in 30 hours. As part of an analysis of the sustainability and economics of EnviroMetal's lixiviant and process a series of ten locked cycle tests were performed to evaluate the continued reusability of the lixiviant. Each of the ten separate tests was conducted using the same original lixiviant and a unique ore sample. Each cycle test included full-cycle leaching of the unique ore sample to produce a gold-rich pregnant solution ("PLS"), electrowinning of the gold from the PLS, and double washing the leach residue (tailings) with water to recover residual key reagents. Over the ten cycles of the test, gold recoveries ranged from 88% to 99% with an average recovery of 95.2%. Despite the variations in the ore samples there was no evident trend of decreasing gold recovery with increasing cycles; and reusing and recycling the lixiviant repeatedly did not appear to reduce gold recovery over the ten cycles.