Fitch Ratings has affirmed
The Rating Outlook for the Long-Term IDRs is Stable. At the same time, Fitch Ratings has affirmed its holding company Credicorp Ltd IDR at 'BBB' with a Stable Outlook.
Fitch is also withdrawing BCP's Support Rating and Support Rating Floor as they are no longer relevant to the agency's coverage following the publication of Fitch's updated Bank Rating Criteria on
Key Rating Drivers
BCP
VR, IDRS AND SENIOR DEBT
BCP's IDRs are driven by its VR of 'bbb', which is in line with the implied VR. Fitch believes the operating environment factor influences BCP ratings. The bank's leading franchise and well diversified business profile, as well as its sound financial profile, underpin BCP's ratings. BCP's ratings are constrained to the sovereign level due to limited geographic diversification outside of Peru and material exposure to foreign currency.
The Stable Outlook on the Long-Term IDRs reflects Fitch's view that BCP's core financial metrics have sufficient headroom to maintain its current ratings, even if economic conditions are moderately weaker than Fitch's base case because of external shocks or ongoing political and policy uncertainty.
BCP is the largest bank in the Peruvian financial system. It is the main subsidiary of
BCP's consolidated loan quality ratios were impacted by the maturity of loans related to Reactiva program after the grace period that started to finish in
However, even with this deterioration, BCP's asset quality is well within the benchmarks for its rating category. Loan impairment charges as a proportion of average gross loans ratio returned to pre-pandemic levels at YE 2021 (1.44%) following a sharp increase in 2020 due to the pandemic. Consolidated reserve coverage is beginning to revert to historical levels (YE 2021: 199.8%; 2017-2019 average: 186.5%), but it still remains high and sufficient to cover expected losses.
BCP's capital position benefits from conservative internal solvency limits, recurrent profitability, moderate asset growth, and conservative dividend policy. BCP's FCC ratio stood at 12.48% at YE 2021, reflecting higher risk-weight average (RWA) density (risk weighted assets to total assets ratio). BCP's regulatory capital ratio was 14.9% as of
Historically, profitability has been a strength relative to domestic peers and is at the higher end of the benchmark range for its rating category. Lower loan impairment charges positively affected profitability, with net income close to 2019 levels. In addition, a positive impact came from liability management during 2021. On the other hand, operational expenses increased due to the bank's digitalization strategy, including new infrastructure and new positions as well as the impact resulted from the branches' adaptation.
The bank's operating profit to risk weighted assets ratio increased significantly to 2.71% at YE 2021 (YE 2020: 0.67%. 2016-2019 average: 3.70%). Though this remains below pre-pandemic levels, Fitch expects profitability to recover to this level in the next 18 months. Gradual change of the business mix in favor of retail lending different to those from the Reactiva program should slightly pressure provision expenses upward.
BCP benefits from a well-diversified and low-cost deposit base consisting predominantly of demand and savings deposits, which comprised about 80% of customer deposits at YE 2021 BCP has the highest deposit market share in the country across all major products (32%) and has historically benefited from flight to quality in times of stress. BCP's loan to deposit ratio was 101.9% at YE 2021, slightly below the ratio from 2020 when liquidity from Reactiva and the pension funds withdrawals were present in the system. Fitch expects this ratio to return to historical levels in 2022 as loan growth recovers in segments not related to government programs.
BCP's senior unsecured bonds are rated at the same level as the bank's IDRs, considering the absence of credit enhancement or any subordination feature.
Rating Sensitivities
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:
BCP
VR, IDRs AND SENIOR DEBT
BCP IDRs are sensitive to a material deterioration in the local operating environment or a negative sovereign rating action;
BCP's VRs could be negatively affected if the banks' asset quality deteriorates significantly and causes a sustained decline in the banks' operating profits to RWA ratio to below 2.5% and in the bank's FCC/adjusted RWA ratio to less than 10% (assuming the maintenance of excess reserves and non-core loss absorbing capital) for more than four consecutive quarters;
The ratings could also be pressured by a material deterioration of asset quality and profitability metrics due to the disruption of economic activity as a result of to the political turmoil;
BCP's senior debt ratings would move in line with its Long-Term IDR.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:
There is limited upside potential for BCP's ratings given the sovereign's current rating and Outlook and under the light of the increasingly challenging operating environment;
Over the medium term, ratings could be upgraded by the confluence of an improvement of the operating environment and the bank's financial profile;
BCP's senior debt ratings would move in line with its Long-Term IDR.
OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: KEY RATING DRIVERS
GOVERNMENT SUPPORT RATING
Given its size and systemic importance, BCP is likely to receive support from the Peruvian government, should it be required, underpinning its GSR of 'bbb'. The sovereign's ability to provide support is reflected in its 'BBB'/Stable IDR, which is underpinned by its sound financial position, ample international reserves and low debt levels. BCP's 30% market share in deposits and its outsized presence in all business segments make it a crucial part of Peru's financial sector.
OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: RATING SENSITIVITIES
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:
BCP's GSR would be affected if Fitch negatively changes its assessment of the government's ability and/or willingness to support the bank.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:
BCP's GSR would be affected if Fitch positively changes its assessment of the government's ability and/or willingness to support the bank.
SUBSIDIARIES & AFFILIATES: KEY RATING DRIVERS
IDRS AND SENIOR DEBT
The equalization is mainly driven by
The capital structure of
Consolidated profitability is improving but still far from pre-pandemic levels (ROAE and ROAA at YE 2021: 14.26% and 1.50% respectively).
The senior global debt rating is at the same level as
SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES: RATING SENSITIVITIES
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:
IDRS AND SENIOR DEBT
Additionally, a change in the dividend flows from the operating companies or debt levels at the holding company that affects its debt coverage ratios could also be detrimental to its ratings;
The ratings for
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:
VR ADJUSTMENTS
The Operating Environment score has been assigned above the implied score due to the following adjustment reason: Sovereign Rating (positive);
The Capitalization and Leverage score has been assigned above the implied score due to the following adjustment reason: Reserve coverage and asset valuation (positive).
Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario
International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions and Covered Bond issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from '
REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING
The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.
Public Ratings with Credit Linkage to other ratings
The ratings of
ESG Considerations
Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg
(C) 2022 Electronic News Publishing, source