Form for reporting on the recommendations on corporate governance
1
This form is meant as a tool for Danish companies with shares admitted to trading on a regulated market who wish to report on the company's compliance with the recommendations on corporate governance in a standard reporting format.
The recommendation text of this form does not replace the recommendations; reference is made to the recommendations on corporate governance with regard to preface, introduction and comments. The Committee's comments on the recommendations may be included as guidelines and inspiration for companies in their work on the recommendations. In this connection the comments are meant as a tool. The reporting on corporate governance itself should only be carried out in compliance with the specific recommendations of the Committee, and not according to the comments or guidelines.
The report must be composed in Danish and must be provided in a corporate governance report published as either part of the management commentary on the annual report or on the company's website with exact reference to the management commentary. The Committee believes that publication of the corporate governance report on the company's website - with exact reference to the report in the management commentary - creates the highest degree of transparency. Publication of the report on the company's website provides easier access for investors and other stakeholders.
Under the Financial Statements Act a publication on the company's website requires that the URL address - where the corporate governance report is published - is stated in the management commentary in the annual report. The URL address must be the internet address which can be used to access the report directly.
There are further requirements to the preparation of the report on corporate governance and how it is to be published. The detailed requirements are described in Executive order no. 558 of 1 June 2016 on Publication of Reports pursuant to the Financial Statements Act.
Notice: The form below contains the recommendations of the Committee on Corporate Governance of November 23, 2017. The recommendations are available on the website of the Committee on Corporate Governance www.corporategovernance.dk. Nasdaq Copenhagen A/S has decided to include the recommendations in the Rules for issuers of shares by January 3, 2018. This form may be used for the preparation of the report on corporate governance in annual reports concerning financial years commencing January 1, 2018 or later.
2
"Comply or explain"
If a company deviates from parts of the recommendations, the company has to explain the reasons for the deviations, cf. section 107 b (1) (iii) of the Financial Statements Act. The company has to explain why it has chosen not to comply with a recommendation and what it has chosen to do instead. Failure to comply with a recommendation is not considered a breach of rules, but merely implies that the board of directors of the company has chosen a different approach. The market must decide whether deviations are justified and whether the explanation is satisfactory. A good explanation provides specific insight for stakeholders to be able to decide on any investments. In order to create the transparency necessary for investors, companies must respond to each recommendation and provide information on whether or not they will comply with the recommendation in question.
Note that the reporting must reflect the current style of management at the time of the reporting. In the event of significant changes during the year, or after the balance sheet date, descriptions of the changes should be included in the corporate governance report. Companies must consider each of the recommendations.
If the company complies partially with a recommendation the company must specify which parts it is complying with, why it is deviating from the remaining part of the recommendation and what it has chosen to do instead.
The Committee has observed that many companies choose to provide supplementary information even in cases where the company complies with a recommendation. The Committee encourages companies to provide supplementary information where this increases transparency.
3
The report concerns the financial year 1 January 2020 - 31 December 2020
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |
partially | comply | |||
1. Communication and interaction by the company with its investors and other stakeholders
1.1. Dialogue between company, shareholders and other stakeholders
1.1.1. The Committee recommends that the board of | Carlsberg aims at providing information and | |||
opportunities for dialogue to its shareholders | ||||
directors ensure ongoing dialogue between the company | X | |||
through regular publication of news, interim | ||||
and its shareholders so that the shareholders gain relevant | ||||
reports, annual reports and general meetings. | ||||
insight into the company and in order for the board of | ||||
directors to be aware of the shareholders' views, interests | Carlsberg has an Investor Relations | |||
and opinions in relation to the company. | ||||
department that assists the Executive Board | ||||
with its regular meetings and teleconferences | ||||
with investors and analysts in or outside | ||||
Denmark. Carlsberg has a separate section for | ||||
4 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |
partially | comply | |||
investor information on its website where it | ||||
regularly provides comprehensive information | ||||
about financial and operational issues and | ||||
where all information announced to the | ||||
market is easily and readily available. | ||||
Investors (and others) can sign up on | ||||
Carlsberg's investor portal to receive regular | ||||
information from the company. Further, the | ||||
Investor Relations department meets with | ||||
proxy advisors to exchange views and in order | ||||
for both Carlsberg and its stakeholders to gain | ||||
a deeper understanding of each other. | ||||
From time to time, the Chairmanship and the | ||||
Remuneration Committee Chair meet with | ||||
major shareholders to discuss specific matters | ||||
raised by the shareholders. | ||||
Due to Covid-19, many shareholder | ||||
engagement meetings have been conducted | ||||
digitally, which has worked to the satisfaction | ||||
of all parties, given the circumstances. | ||||
1.1.2. The Committee recommends that the board of | X | Carlsberg has adopted a Communication Policy | ||
directors adopt policies on the company's relationship with | and strategy. In its Communication Policy, | |||
its stakeholders, including shareholders, and that the | Carlsberg identifies its key stakeholders and | |||
board of directors ensure that the interests of the | their main interests in relation to the | |||
stakeholders are respected in accordance with company | company. | |||
policies. | ||||
5 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
The Communication Policy and related | ||||||
procedures also serve to ensure that | ||||||
information of importance to investors (and | ||||||
other key stakeholders as relevant) is made | ||||||
available to them and published in accordance | ||||||
with applicable rules and regulations. | ||||||
1.1.3. The Committee recommends that the company | X | Carlsberg published quarterly reports in 2020 | ||||
publish quarterly reports | on 4 February (full year 2019) and on 13 | |||||
August (1st half year) and trading statements | ||||||
on 30 April (Q1) and on 27 October (Q3). | ||||||
Carlsberg finds that half-year reporting is more | ||||||
appropriate due to the seasonality of its | ||||||
business and that Carlsberg historically has | ||||||
seen high volatility in quarterly earnings and | ||||||
margins as a result of phasing of costs. | ||||||
Carlsberg considers the high volatility as | ||||||
potentially misleading for the understanding of | ||||||
the underlying Group performance. For these | ||||||
reasons, Carlsberg finds half-yearly reporting | ||||||
more appropriate. | ||||||
1.2. General meeting | ||||||
1.2.1. The Committee recommends that in organising the | X | The Supervisory Board and the Executive | ||||
Board promote active ownership, including | ||||||
company's general meeting, the board of directors plans | ||||||
shareholders' attendance at general meetings | ||||||
the meeting to support active ownership. | ||||||
• by announcing well in advance the date | ||||||
of the general meeting on its website; | ||||||
6 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |
partially | comply | |||
• by distributing invitations to shareholders | ||||
to general meetings to all shareholders | ||||
either directly or through information on | ||||
the company's website and through | ||||
announcements on Nasdaq Copenhagen, | ||||
and | ||||
• by informing shareholders of their right | ||||
to ask questions and submit proposals | ||||
for the general meeting. | ||||
All shareholders and other stakeholders are in | ||||
addition invited to attend quarterly calls with | ||||
Carlsberg's top management in relation to | ||||
quarterly announcements and are able to ask | ||||
questions and, as mentioned above, the | ||||
Chairmanship and the Remuneration | ||||
Committee Chair meet from time to time and | ||||
often in connection with the annual general | ||||
meeting with major shareholders to discuss | ||||
specific matters raised by the shareholders. | ||||
In 2020, Carlsberg was due to the Covid-19 | ||||
restrictions forced to exercise its contribution in | ||||
its shareholders' active ownership primarily via | ||||
digital means, including the AGM 2020. | ||||
1.2.2. The Committee recommends that proxies or votes | X | The proxies used for the general meeting | ||
by post for the general meeting allow shareholders to | generally allow shareholders to consider each | |||
consider each individual item on the agenda. | individual item on the agenda. This was also | |||
7 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | ||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | ||
partially | comply | ||||
the case with regard to the proxy for the | |||||
Annual General Meeting in 2020. | |||||
1.3. Takeover bids | |||||
1.3.1. The Committee recommends that the company set | X | The Supervisory Board of Carlsberg has a | |||
up contingency procedures in the event of takeover bids, | Takeover Manual with procedures and | ||||
guidance in the event of a takeover offer. | |||||
from the time that the board of directors has reason to | |||||
According to the Takeover Manual, the | |||||
believe that a takeover bid will be made. The contingency | |||||
Supervisory Board is not at any time entitled | |||||
procedures should establish that the board of directors | |||||
to take any steps that in reality prevents that | |||||
should not without the acceptance of the general meeting, | |||||
a future takeover offer is presented to the | |||||
attempt to counter the takeover bid by making decisions | |||||
shareholders at a General Meeting. The | |||||
which, in reality, prevent the shareholders from deciding | |||||
Supervisory Board will in the event of a | |||||
on the takeover bid themselves. | |||||
takeover offer, consider specifically what will | |||||
be in the best interest of all shareholders (and | |||||
more widely of the company) before it decides | |||||
whether or not to present an offer to the | |||||
shareholders. | |||||
Carlsberg's articles of association do not | |||||
contain any provisions that limit ownership or | |||||
voting rights or that make it possible for the | |||||
Supervisory Board generally to prevent | |||||
takeover bids. | |||||
Carlsberg's Supervisory Board will consider a | |||||
potential bid to take over the company's | |||||
shares in accordance with applicable | |||||
legislation and the Takeover Manual. | |||||
Carlsberg's principal shareholder, the | |||||
8 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
Carlsberg Foundation, is obliged to hold at | ||||||
least 51% of the votes of the share capital of | ||||||
Carlsberg A/S according to its charter. | ||||||
2. Tasks and responsibilities of the board of directors | ||||||
2.1. Overall tasks and responsibilities | ||||||
2.1.1. The Committee recommends that at least once | X | The Supervisory Board once a year defines its | ||||
annually the board of directors consider the matters that | most important tasks and decides on an | |||||
annual plan for the following year. In the | ||||||
should be included in the board's performance of its work. | ||||||
board evaluation process the Supervisory | ||||||
Board considers whether all its responsibilities | ||||||
have been dealt with. | ||||||
Once a year, the Supervisory Board also | ||||||
reviews its rules of procedures in accordance | ||||||
with the annual plan and considers if any | ||||||
changes are required. | ||||||
X | The Supervisory Board discusses Carlsberg's | |||||
strategy Sail22 and Carlsberg's overall | ||||||
2.1.2. The Committee recommends that at least once | organisation continuously and in particular in a | |||||
dedicated annual strategy seminar. In 2020, | ||||||
annually the board of directors consider the overall | the strategy seminar was conducted as a | |||||
strategy of the company with a view to ensuring value | virtual meeting due to the Covid-19 | |||||
creation in the company. | restrictions. The Supervisory Board agreed that | |||||
a virtual meeting is not an optimal format for | ||||||
strategy discussions and look forward to | ||||||
convening physically for the strategy session. | ||||||
9 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | ||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | ||
partially | comply | ||||
2.1.3. The Committee recommends that the board of | X | The Supervisory Board regularly assesses | |||
directors ensure that the company has a capital and share | whether the company's capital and share | ||||
structure which supports that the strategy and long-term | structures fulfill the interests of the Carlsberg | ||||
value creation of the company are in the best interest of | Group and its shareholders and supports the | ||||
the shareholders and the company, and that the board of | long-term profitable growth and development | ||||
directors explain this in the management commentary | of the business. This assessment is accounted | ||||
and/or on the company's website. | for in the Annual Report. | ||||
2.1.4. The Committee recommends that the board of | X | The Supervisory Board supervises the work of | |||
directors annually review and approve guidelines for the | the Executive Board and has as part of its | ||||
Rules of Procedures issued Guidelines for the | |||||
executive board; this includes establishing requirements | |||||
Executive Board. These Guidelines (together | |||||
for the executive board's reporting to the board of | |||||
with the Rules of Procedure for the | |||||
directors. | |||||
Supervisory Board) are considered by the | |||||
Supervisory Board approximately once a year. | |||||
The Rules of Procedure for the Supervisory | |||||
Board and the Guidelines for the Executive | |||||
Board jointly set out the overall duties and | |||||
obligations of the Executive Board, procedures | |||||
for the Executive Board's reporting to the | |||||
Supervisory Board and for other | |||||
communication and decision processes | |||||
between the two bodies. | |||||
2.1.5. The Committee recommends that at least once | X | In connection with its annual evaluation | |||
annually, the board of directors discuss the composition, | process, the Supervisory Board also evaluates | ||||
developments, risks and succession plans of the executive | the composition and performance of the | ||||
board. | Executive Board and it has at least once a year | ||||
a structured discussion of succession planning | |||||
with regard to the Executive Board as well as a | |||||
10 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
general review and discussion of talent | ||||||
management and succession planning in the | ||||||
company. | ||||||
2.2. Corporate social responsibility | ||||||
X | Carlsberg has adopted CSR policies and | |||||
published them on its website and reports on | ||||||
its sustainability approach and initiatives in the | ||||||
Carlsberg Annual Report and the Group | ||||||
Sustainability Report. Carlsberg has a dedicated | ||||||
sustainability department and provides detailed | ||||||
2.2.1. The Committee recommends that the board of | information on the implementation of its | |||||
sustainability initiatives, its long-term targets | ||||||
directors adopt policies on corporate social responsibility. | ||||||
on each area and the progress it has made | ||||||
towards reaching these. In 2017, Carlsberg | ||||||
launched an ambitious sustainability | ||||||
programme "Together Towards Zero" and has | ||||||
also in 2020 made good progress on the | ||||||
programme as further described in the | ||||||
Carlsberg Group Sustainability Report. | ||||||
2.3. Chairman and vice-chairman of the board of directors | ||||||
2.3.1. The Committee recommends appointing a vice | X | The Supervisory Board has appointed a deputy | ||||
chairman of the board of directors, who will assume the | chairman who acts in the chairman's absence | |||||
responsibilities of the chairman in the event of the | and acts as an effective sounding board for the | |||||
chairman's absence, and who will also act as effective | chairman. The Rules of Procedure for the | |||||
sparring partner for the chairman. | Supervisory Board set out tasks etc. for the | |||||
chairman and, in his absence, the deputy | ||||||
chairman. The chairman and the deputy | ||||||
chairman form the chairmanship of the | ||||||
11 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
company who prepare Supervisory Board | ||||||
meetings together with the Executive Board in | ||||||
accordance with an annual meeting plan. | ||||||
2.3.2. The Committee recommends that, if the board of | X | The chairman does not participate in the day- | ||||
directors, in exceptional cases, asks the chairman of the | to-day management of the company and does | |||||
board of directors or other board members to perform | not carry out other tasks for the company than | |||||
special activities for the company, including briefly | handling the task as chairman of the company. | |||||
participating in the day-to-day management, a board | There were no exceptions to this in 2020. | |||||
resolution to that effect should be passed to ensure that | ||||||
the board of directors maintains its independent, general | ||||||
management and control function. Resolutions on the | ||||||
chairman's or other board members' participation in day- | ||||||
to-day management and the expected duration hereof | ||||||
should be publicly announced. | ||||||
3. Composition and organisation of the board of directors | ||||||
3.1. Composition | ||||||
3.1.1. The Committee recommends that the board of | X | In accordance with its annual plan, the | ||||
Supervisory Board once a year (on the basis | ||||||
directors annually evaluate and in the management | ||||||
of a recommendation from the Nomination | ||||||
commentary account for | ||||||
Committee) considers the skills that should be | ||||||
• the competencies that it must have to best perform its | ||||||
represented on the board and takes this into | ||||||
tasks, | consideration when preparing proposals for | |||||
• the composition of the board of directors, and | new candidates for the Supervisory Board. A | |||||
• the special competencies of each member. | "Specification of Competencies required for | |||||
the Supervisory Board in Carlsberg A/S" has | ||||||
been developed by the Supervisory Board, is | ||||||
12 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
reviewed annually and available on Carlsberg's | ||||||
website. | ||||||
The Annual Report and Carlsberg's website | ||||||
contain a section describing the composition of | ||||||
the Supervisory Board and also detailed | ||||||
information about each Supervisory Board | ||||||
member. | ||||||
X | The Supervisory Board at least once a year | |||||
discusses the company's activities to ensure | ||||||
diversity at relevant management levels. The | ||||||
Supervisory Board has established objectives | ||||||
for diversity at the Supervisory Board level and | ||||||
3.1.2. The Committee recommends that the board of | in the annual report it accounts for the | |||||
objectives and the progress made. | ||||||
directors annually discuss the company's activities to | The Supervisory Board reviewed and approved | |||||
ensure relevant diversity at management levels and | ||||||
a Diversity & Inclusion policy in 2020 which is | ||||||
prepare and adopt a policy on diversity. The policy should | ||||||
published on the company's website. | ||||||
be published on the company's website. | ||||||
The company's actions and plans to increase | ||||||
the number of the underrepresented gender (in | ||||||
this case women) in senior management | ||||||
positions in the company is explained in more | ||||||
details in the Annual Report. | ||||||
3.1.3. The Committee recommends that the selection | X | The Nomination Committee heads the process | ||||
and nomination of candidates for the board of directors be | for selecting and nominating candidates for | |||||
the Supervisory Board. In this process a | ||||||
carried out through a careful and transparent process | ||||||
number of factors are taken into | ||||||
approved by the board of directors. When assessing its | ||||||
13 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
composition and nominating new candidates, the board of | consideration, including the Specification of | |||||
directors should, in addition to the need for competencies | Competencies, the company's strategy, the | |||||
and qualifications, take into consideration the need for | need for specific experience or skills as well as | |||||
integration of new talent and diversity. | diversity. | |||||
The Nomination Committee has a mandate to | ||||||
propose candidates to the Supervisory Board | ||||||
who will then decide on the final nomination to | ||||||
the Annual General Meeting of candidates for | ||||||
the Supervisory Board. | ||||||
3.1.4. The Committee recommends that the notice | X | Carlsberg's notices of a general meeting | ||||
include the recommended information about | ||||||
convening a general meeting where the agenda includes | the candidates for the Supervisory Board in | |||||
the election of members to the board of directors, include | relation to both new candidates and | |||||
(in addition to the statutory requirements) a description of | candidates that are proposed for re-election. | |||||
the qualifications of nominated candidates, including | ||||||
information about the candidates' | Carlsberg lists in the Annual Report and on its | |||||
• other executive functions, including positions on | website the Supervisory Board members with | |||||
executive boards, boards of directors and supervisory | links to the Carlsberg Foundation and therefore | |||||
boards, including board committees, in Danish and | are not independent of Carlsberg as defined in | |||||
foreign enterprises, and | the recommendations. The five Supervisory | |||||
• demanding organisational tasks. | Board members that are considered | |||||
independent as defined in the | ||||||
Furthermore, it should be indicated if the candidates to the | recommendations are Lars Fruergaard | |||||
board of directors are considered independent. | Jørgensen, Richard Burrows, Magdi Batato, | |||||
Lilian Biner and Domitille Doat-Le Bigot. | ||||||
3.1.5. The Committee recommends that members of the | X | No member of Carlsberg's executive board is | ||||
member of the Supervisory Board. | ||||||
company's executive board be not members of the board | ||||||
of directors and that a resigning chief executive officer be | ||||||
14 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
not directly elected as chairman or vice chairman for the | Carlsberg has not had nor does Carlsberg plan | |||||
same company. | to have a resigning CEO directly elected as | |||||
chair or deputy chair. | ||||||
3.1.6. The Committee recommends that members of the | X | According to the Company's Articles of | ||||
Association, section 27(3), Supervisory Board | ||||||
board of directors elected by the general meeting be up | ||||||
members are elected for one year at a time. | ||||||
for election every year at the annual general meeting. | ||||||
Re-election is possible. | ||||||
3.2. Independence of the board of directors | ||||||
3.2.1. The Committee recommends that at least half of | X | Five of the ten members of Carlsberg's | ||||
Supervisory Board elected by the Annual | ||||||
the members of the board of directors elected by the | ||||||
General Meeting have close links to Carlsberg's | ||||||
general meeting be independent persons, in order for the | ||||||
principal shareholder, the Carlsberg Foundation | ||||||
board of directors to be able to act independently of | ||||||
as they make up the Foundation's Board. The | ||||||
special interests. | ||||||
other five members elected by the general | ||||||
To be considered independent, this person may not: | ||||||
meeting have an international business | ||||||
• be or within the past five years have been a member of | background. These five members with an | |||||
international business background are all | ||||||
the executive board, or senior staff member in the | ||||||
independent as defined in the | ||||||
company, a subsidiary or an associated company, | ||||||
recommendations. | ||||||
• within the last five years, have received large | ||||||
emoluments from the company/group, a subsidiary or | ||||||
an associated company in a different capacity than as | ||||||
member of the board of directors, | ||||||
• represent or be associated with a controlling | ||||||
shareholder, | ||||||
• within the past year, have had significant business | ||||||
relations (e.g. personally or indirectly as partner or | ||||||
employee, shareholder, customer, supplier or member | ||||||
of management in companies with corresponding | ||||||
15 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | ||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | ||
partially | comply | ||||
connection) with the company, a subsidiary or an | |||||
associated company. | |||||
• be or within the past three years have been employed | |||||
or been a partner in the same company as the auditor | |||||
elected by the general meeting, | |||||
• be the chief executive officer in a company with cross- | |||||
memberships with the company, | |||||
• have been a member of the board of directors for more | |||||
than 12 years, or | |||||
• be a close relative with persons who are not considered | |||||
independent. | |||||
Even if a member of the board of directors is not covered | |||||
by the above criteria, certain conditions may exist that will | |||||
lead the board of directors to decide that one or more | |||||
members cannot be regarded as independent. | |||||
3.3. Members of the board of directors and the number of other management functions | |||||
3.3.1. The Committee recommends that each member of | X | Each member of the Supervisory Board is | |||
the board of directors assess the expected time | responsible for assessing the expected time | ||||
commitment for each function so that the member does | commitment for the functions they carry out to | ||||
not take on more functions than he/she can complete at a | ensure that they each have the necessary time | ||||
satisfactory level for the company. | to carry out their tasks as board members in | ||||
Carlsberg. This obligation is also set out in the | |||||
Rules of Procedure and in a Letter of | |||||
Appointment (a "board contract" setting out the | |||||
fundamental duties of Supervisory Board | |||||
members elected by the Annual General | |||||
Meeting) which all Supervisory Board members | |||||
have signed. | |||||
16 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |
partially | comply | |||
X | The Annual Report (and the Company's |
3.3.2. The Committee recommends that the | website) contains this information in the |
section describing each member of the | |
management commentary, in addition to the provisions | Supervisory Board. |
laid down by legislation, includes the following information | |
about the members of the board of directors: | Carlsberg explains in the Annual Report and |
• the position of the relevant person, | on its website which Supervisory Board |
• the age and gender of the person in question, | members have links to the Carlsberg |
• the person's competencies and qualifications that are | Foundation and therefore are not independent |
relevant to the company | of Carlsberg as defined in the |
• whether the member is considered independent, | recommendations. |
• the member's date of appointment to the board of | The 2020 Annual Report contains information |
directors, | |
• expiry of the current election term, | about each Supervisory Board member's |
• the member's participation in the meetings on the | occupation and about all managerial positions |
board of directors and committee meetings, | and directorships at other companies in |
• other management functions, including memberships in | Denmark and abroad, as well as demanding |
executive boards, boards of directors, and supervisory | organisational tasks, held by members of the |
boards, including board committees in Danish and | Supervisory Board. |
foreign enterprises and demanding organisational tasks, | For 2020, information on the individual |
and | |
• the number of shares, options, warrants and similar | holdings of shares in Carlsberg by Supervisory |
owned by the member in the company and other group | Board members is included in the |
companies, as well as changes to the member's | remuneration report, which is now a separate |
portfolio of the mentioned securities which have | document from the Annual Report. |
occurred during the financial year. |
17
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
3.3.3. The Committee recommends that the annual | X | As part of the annual evaluation process, the | ||||
Supervisory Board members are asked to | ||||||
evaluation procedure, cf. section 3.5, include an | ||||||
consider and discuss with the Chairman in the | ||||||
evaluation of what is regarded as a reasonable level for | ||||||
1:1 evaluation conversation what is regarded | ||||||
the number of other management functions, where the | ||||||
as a reasonable level for the number of other | ||||||
number, level and complexity of the other individual | ||||||
management functions. | ||||||
management functions are taken into account. | ||||||
3.4. Board committees | ||||||
3.4.1. The Committee recommends that the company | X | The Annual Report and the Company website | ||||
contain the information recommended for all | ||||||
publish the following on the company's website: | ||||||
three board committees. | ||||||
• the terms of reference of the board committees, | ||||||
The Terms of Reference for each committee are | ||||||
• the most important activities of the committees during | approved by the Supervisory Board and | |||||
the year and the number of meetings held by each | reviewed annually. | |||||
committee, and | ||||||
• the names of the members of each committee, | ||||||
including the chairmen of the committees, as well as | ||||||
information regarding which members are independent | ||||||
members and which members have special | ||||||
competencies. | ||||||
3.4.2. The Committee recommends that a majority of the | X | According to the terms of reference for each | ||||
members of a board committee be independent. | committee, the majority of the committee | |||||
members must be independent members of the | ||||||
Supervisory Board. In 2020, all four Audit | ||||||
Committee members were independent in | ||||||
accordance with the criteria set out in the | ||||||
recommendations, three of the four members | ||||||
of the Remuneration Committee were | ||||||
18 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | |||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | ||||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | ||||
partially | comply | ||||||
independent while two of the four members of | |||||||
the Nomination Committee are independent | |||||||
X | The Supervisory Board established an Audit | ||||||
Committee in 2009. In 2020 the Audit | |||||||
Committee fulfilled all tasks set out in its | |||||||
terms of reference. The work of the committee | |||||||
is described in the Annual Report (the | |||||||
Corporate Governance section). | |||||||
3.4.3. The Committee recommends that the members of | The Audit Committee is appointed for one year | ||||||
at a time. In 2020, Carlsberg's Audit | |||||||
the board of directors set up an audit committeeand that | |||||||
Committee had four members appointed by the | |||||||
a chairman is appointed who is not the chairman of the | |||||||
Supervisory Board: Lilian Fossum Biner (Chair), | |||||||
board of directors. | |||||||
Richard Burrows, Magdi Batato and Lars | |||||||
Fruergaard Jørgensen. The Audit Committee is | |||||||
appointed for one year at a time. All four | |||||||
members are independent in accordance with | |||||||
the definition in the recommendations and all | |||||||
have expertise and experience of relevance to | |||||||
the company's sector and several members | |||||||
have qualifications within accounting and audit. | |||||||
3.4.4. The Committee recommends that, prior to the | X | The Audit Committee has five regular meetings | |||||
every year in accordance with a detailed annual | |||||||
approval of the annual report and other financial reports, | |||||||
meeting plan, and in addition arranges ad hoc | |||||||
the audit committee monitor and report to the board of | |||||||
meeting when relevant. Prior to the approval of | |||||||
directors about: | |||||||
the annual report and other financial reports, | |||||||
• | significant accounting policies, | ||||||
the Audit Committee monitors and reports to | |||||||
• | significant accounting estimates, | the Supervisory Board on the recommended | |||||
• related party transactions, and | matters. | ||||||
19 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
• uncertainties and risks, including in relation to the | ||||||
outlook for the current year. | ||||||
3.4.5. The Committee recommends that the audit | X | Carlsberg has established an internal audit | ||||
function. The head of the internal audit function | ||||||
committee: | ||||||
participates in all Audit Committee meetings | ||||||
• annually assesses the need for an internal audit | ||||||
and reports to the Audit Committee on all | ||||||
function and, in such a case, presents mandates and | significant matters, including the executive | |||||
recommendations on selecting, appointing and | board's follow-up on the conclusions and | |||||
removing the head of any internal audit function and | recommendations of the internal audit function. | |||||
on the budget of the internal audit function, | Once a year, the Audit Committee evaluates | |||||
• ensure that if an internal audit has been established, a | the internal audit function and monitors that it | |||||
description of its functions is available and approved by | has adequate resources and competencies. | |||||
the board of directors, | ||||||
• ensure that if an internal audit has been established, | The work of the internal audit function is | |||||
adequate resources and competencies are allocated to | further described in the Annual Report. | |||||
carry out the work, and | ||||||
• monitor the executive board's follow-up on the | ||||||
conclusions and recommendations of the internal audit | ||||||
function. | ||||||
3.4.6. The Committee recommends that the board of | X | The Supervisory Board has a Nomination | ||||
Committee that works in accordance with | ||||||
directors establish a nomination committee,which is at | Terms of Reference set out by the Supervisory | |||||
least, responsible for the following preparatory tasks: | Board. The Terms of Reference are available on | |||||
• describing the qualifications required by the board of | the company's website and the duties of the | |||||
committee comprises all of the recommended | ||||||
directors and the executive board and for a given | ||||||
preparatory tasks as well as the following: | ||||||
position, indicating the time expected to be spent | ||||||
carrying out a specific position, as well as assessing | • Evaluation and recommendation to the | |||||
the competencies, knowledge and experience found in | ||||||
Supervisory Board with regard to potential | ||||||
the two governing bodies, | ||||||
training and updating of the expertise and skills | ||||||
20 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
• annually assessing the structure, size, composition and | of the Supervisory Board and the Executive | |||||
results of the board of directors and the executive | Board | |||||
board and recommend any changes to the board of | • Recommendations to the Supervisory Board | |||||
directors, | ||||||
• annually assessing the competencies, knowledge, | with regard to diversity on the Supervisory | |||||
experience and succession of the individual members | Board and the Company's objectives for such | |||||
of management and report to the board of directors in | diversity and monitoring and advising the | |||||
this respect, | Supervisory Board on the overall succession | |||||
• recommending candidates for the board of directors | planning for the Executive Committee. | |||||
and the executive board, and | ||||||
• proposing an action plan to the board of directors on | ||||||
the future composition of the board of directors, | ||||||
including proposals for specific changes. | ||||||
3.4.7. The Committee recommends that the board of | X | The Supervisory Board has a Remuneration | ||||
directors establish a remuneration committee,which is at | ||||||
Committee, which works in accordance with | ||||||
least, responsible for the following preparatory tasks: | ||||||
Terms of Reference set out by the Supervisory | ||||||
• recommending the remuneration policy (including the | ||||||
Board. | ||||||
"General Guidelines for incentive-based | ||||||
Remuneration") to the board of directors and the | The Terms of Reference are available on the | |||||
executive board for approval by the board of directors | Company's website and the duties of the | |||||
prior to approval by the general meeting, | committee comprises all of the recommended | |||||
• making proposals to the board of directors on | tasks as well as monitoring and advising the | |||||
remuneration for members of the board of directors | Supervisory Board on any major changes to | |||||
and the executive board, as well as ensuring that the | the policy on senior employee benefit | |||||
remuneration is in compliance with the company's | structures for the Group, including for the | |||||
remuneration policy and the assessment of the | Executive Committee. | |||||
performance of the persons concerned. The committee | ||||||
should have information on the total remuneration that | ||||||
21 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
members of the board of directors and the executive | ||||||
board receive from other companies in the group, | ||||||
• recommending a remuneration policy applicable for the | ||||||
company in general and | ||||||
• assisting with the preparation of the annual | ||||||
remuneration report. | ||||||
3.4.8. The Committee recommends that the | X | The Remuneration Committee uses Mercer for | ||||
remuneration committee do not consult with the same | ad hoc external advise and is satisfied as to the | |||||
external advisers as the executive board of the company. | independence of Mercer. | |||||
3.5. Evaluation of the performance of the board of | directors | and the executive board | ||||
3.5.1. The Committee recommends that the board of | X | Once a year, the chairman of the Supervisory | ||||
Board heads a structured evaluation of the | ||||||
directors establish an evaluation procedure for an annual | ||||||
board's work, accomplishments and | ||||||
evaluation of the board of directors and the individual | ||||||
composition. The evaluation process takes | ||||||
members. External assistance should be obtained at least | ||||||
place in accordance with written procedures | ||||||
every third year. The evaluation should inter alia include: | ||||||
established by the Supervisory Board on the | ||||||
• contribution and results, | ||||||
basis of a recommendation from the | ||||||
• cooperation with the executive board, | Nomination Committee. | |||||
• the chairman's leadership of the board of directors, | ||||||
• the composition of the board of directors (including | The chairman conducted in Q4 2020 1:1 | |||||
competencies, diversity and the number of members), | ||||||
evaluation meetings with each Supervisory | ||||||
• the work in the committees and the committee | ||||||
Board member based on a detailed | ||||||
structure, and | ||||||
questionnaire filled in and submitted in advance | ||||||
• the organisation and quality of the material that is | ||||||
by each member, covering together the | ||||||
submitted to the board of directors. | ||||||
recommended topics. The chairman then | ||||||
The evaluation procedure and the general conclusions | ||||||
prepared a report on the outcome of the | ||||||
should be described in the management commentary and | evaluation process to the Supervisory Board | |||||
on the company's website. The chairman should account | and this report formed the basis for a | |||||
22 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | ||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | ||
partially | comply | ||||
for the evaluation of the board of directors, including the | discussion of the matter in the Supervisory | ||||
process and general conclusions on the general meeting | Board. Finally, the evaluation process includes | ||||
prior to the election of the board of directors. | a meeting without the chairman (headed by the | ||||
deputy chairman) at which the performance of | |||||
the chairman is discussed. | |||||
The Supervisory Board, headed by the | |||||
chairman, and on the basis of a | |||||
recommendation from the Nomination | |||||
Committee, considers regularly and at least | |||||
once a year in connection with the annual | |||||
evaluation of the Supervisory Board, if there | |||||
are areas where members' expertise and skills | |||||
need to be updated and whether the | |||||
Supervisory Board's Specification of | |||||
Competencies should be updated. | |||||
In 2020 the Supervisory Board assessed that | |||||
the time was not right to engage external | |||||
assistance for the evaluation. | |||||
3.5.2. The Committee recommends that at least once | X | The evaluation headed by the chairman of the | |||
Supervisory Board also includes an evaluation | |||||
annually, the board of directors evaluate the work and | of the cooperation between the Supervisory | ||||
performance of the executive board in accordance with | Board and the Executive Board and the work, | ||||
pre-defined criteria. Furthermore, the board of directors | accomplishments and composition of the | ||||
should evaluate the need for changes to the structure and | Executive Board. The process includes a | ||||
composition of the executive board, in light of the | Supervisory Board meeting without the | ||||
company's strategy. | presence of the Executive Board at which the | ||||
performance of and cooperation with the | |||||
23 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
Executive Board is discussed. The Supervisory | ||||||
Board continuously considers the appropriate | ||||||
composition of the executive committee, | ||||||
including the executive board and also | ||||||
succession planning. | ||||||
X | The Supervisory Board has an ongoing dialogue | |||||
3.5.3. The Committee recommends that the executive | among itself and with the Executive Board on | |||||
the cooperation between the Supervisory Board | ||||||
board and the board of directors establish a procedure | and the Executive Board and further, the | |||||
according to which their cooperation is evaluated annually | Supervisory Board has issued procedures on its | |||||
through a formalised dialogue between the chairman of | evaluation process which include an annual | |||||
the board of directors and the chief executive officer, and | formalized dialogue between the chairmanship | |||||
that the outcome of the evaluation be presented to the | and the Executive Board as well as each | |||||
board of directors. | member of the broader Executive Committee, | |||||
the outcome of which is presented to and | ||||||
discussed by the Supervisory Board. | ||||||
4. Remuneration of management | ||||||
4.1. Form and content of the remuneration policy | ||||||
4.1.1. The Committee recommends that the board of | X | The Supervisory Board has adopted the | ||||
Carlsberg Remuneration Policy which includes | ||||||
directors prepare a remuneration policy for the board of | ||||||
the recommended components and replaces | ||||||
directors and the executive board, which includes | ||||||
the former Remuneration Guidelines (which | ||||||
• a detailed description of the components of the | ||||||
also covered the recommended elements). The | ||||||
remuneration for members of the board of directors | Remuneration Policy was approved by the | |||||
and the executive board, | General Meeting in March 2020 and is available | |||||
• the reasons for choosing the individual components of | on the Carlsberg. website | |||||
the remuneration, | ||||||
24 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |
partially | comply | |||
- a description of the criteria that form the basis for the balance between the individual components of the remuneration, and
- an explanation for the correlation between the remuneration policy and the company's long-term value creation and relevant related goals.
The remuneration policy should be approved by the | ||
general meeting at least every fourth year and upon any | ||
material amendments and it should be published on the | ||
company's website. | ||
4.1.2. The Committee recommends that if the | X | The remuneration policy and incentive |
programme fulfill the recommendations. | ||
remuneration policy includes variable components, | ||
- limits be set on the variable components of the total remuneration package,
- a reasonable and balanced composition be ensured between remuneration for members of management and the value creation for shareholders in the long term,
- clarity be established about performance criteria and measurability for the award of variable components,
- it is ensured that variable remuneration not only consists of short-term remuneration components, and that long-term remuneration components must have a vesting or maturity period of at least three years, and
- it be ensured that the company has the ability to reclaim, in full or in part, variable components of remuneration that were paid on the basis of
25
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | ||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | ||
partially | comply | ||||
information, which subsequently are found to be | |||||
incorrect. | |||||
4.1.3. The Committee recommends that remuneration of | X | The Supervisory Board members do not | |||
members of the board of directors does not include share | participate in share option, bonus or warrant | ||||
options or warrants. | programs. | ||||
4.1.4. The Committee recommends that if, in relation to | X | The Executive Board is subject to share-based | |||
long-term incentive programmes, a share-based | remuneration. The conditions of the existing | ||||
remuneration is used, the programmes should have a | share option scheme comply with the | ||||
vesting or maturity period of at least three years after | recommendation. Please refer to the detailed | ||||
being allocated and should be roll-over programmes, i.e. | description in the Remuneration Report 2020. | ||||
the options should be granted periodically. | |||||
4.1.5. The Committee recommends that the total value | X | Carlsberg complies with this recommendation. | |||
of the remuneration relating to the notice period, including | |||||
severance pay, do not exceed two years of remuneration, | |||||
including all components of the remuneration. | |||||
4.2. Disclosure of remuneration | |||||
4.2.1. The Committee recommends that the company's | X | The chairman's report at the Annual General | |||
remuneration policy and compliance with this policy be | Meeting in March 2020 included an explanation | ||||
explained and justified annually in the chairman's | of the remuneration policy and compliance with | ||||
statement at the company's general meeting. | this policy. | ||||
X | The Annual General Meeting is each year asked | ||||
4.2.2. The Committee recommends that shareholders at | to approve the proposed remuneration for the | ||||
the general meeting consider proposals for approval of | Supervisory Board for the year to come. Latest, | ||||
the Annual General Meeting in March 2020 was | |||||
26 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | ||
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |||
partially | comply | |||||
remuneration for the board of directors for the current | asked to approve the 2020 remuneration and | |||||
financial year. | similarly, the Annual General Meeting will be | |||||
asked to approve the remuneration for 2021 in | ||||||
March 2021. | ||||||
4.2.3. The Committee recommends that the company | X | Carlsberg's 2020 Remuneration Report provides | ||||
prepares a remuneration report that includes information | information on the Group's remuneration | |||||
on the total remuneration received by each member of the | schemes, the remuneration components and | |||||
board of directors and the executive board from the | the remuneration granted to each member of | |||||
company and other companies in the group and associated | the Supervisory Board and the Executive | |||||
companies for the last three years, including information | Board. | |||||
on the most important content of retention and | ||||||
resignation arrangements and that the correlation | Carlsberg discloses the most important aspects | |||||
between the remuneration and company strategy and | of retention and severance programs in its | |||||
relevant related goals be explained. | Annual Report. | |||||
The remuneration report should be published on the | ||||||
company's website. | ||||||
5. Financial reporting, risk management and audits | ||||||
5.1. Identification of risks and transparency about other relevant information | ||||||
X | The management commentary in the Annual | |||||
5.1.1. The Committee recommends that the board of | Report 2020 includes a detailed description of | |||||
Carlsberg's risk management. | ||||||
directors consider and in the management commentary | ||||||
account for the most important strategic and business- | The Supervisory Board reviews the overall risk | |||||
related risks, risks in connection with the financial | ||||||
reporting as well as for the company's risk management. | exposure and the individual risk factors | |||||
associated with the Carlsberg Group's | ||||||
activities. Such reviews are conducted as | ||||||
27 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying | |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | ||
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | ||
partially | comply | ||||
required and at least once a year. On behalf of | |||||
the Supervisory Board, the Audit Committee | |||||
monitors the overall strategic risk exposure | |||||
and the individual risk factors associated with | |||||
the Group's activities. Monitoring is mainly | |||||
performed in connection with the reporting | |||||
process. | |||||
The Supervisory Board (through the Audit | |||||
Committee) adopts guidelines for the key | |||||
areas of risk, monitors the development and | |||||
observes that plans are in place for the | |||||
management of individual risk factors, | |||||
including commercial and financial risks. For a | |||||
more detailed description of the review of the | |||||
overall risk exposure associated with the | |||||
Group's activities and the current high-risk | |||||
issues identified, please refer to the risk | |||||
management section of the Annual Report. | |||||
5.2. Whistleblower scheme | |||||
5.2.1. The Committee recommends that the board of | X | A whistleblowing scheme has been in place in | |||
Carlsberg since 2010. The Audit Committee is | |||||
directors establish a whistleblower scheme for expedient | provided with quarterly reports on matters | ||||
and confidential notification of serious wrongdoing or | reported in the whistleblower scheme and on | ||||
suspicions thereof. | action taken as a result of such matters | ||||
reported. | |||||
28 |
Recommendation | The | The | The | The explanation for complying |
company | company | company | partially/not complying with the | |
complies | complies | does not | recommendation | |
partially | comply | |||
5.3. Contact to auditor
X | The Supervisory Board maintains a regular | |||
dialogue and exchange of information with the | ||||
auditor. The auditors participate in all Audit | ||||
Committee meetings and in the Supervisory | ||||
Board meeting at which the annual statement | ||||
is discussed and approved. The auditors' report | ||||
5.3.1. The Committee recommends that the board of | any significant findings regarding accounting | |||
directors ensure regular dialogue and exchange of | matters and any significant internal control | |||
information between the auditor elected by the general | deficiencies to the Supervisory Board through | |||
meeting and the board of directors, including that the | the Audit Committee and through its written | |||
board of directors and the audit committee meet with the | long-form audit reports to the Supervisory | |||
auditor elected by the general meeting at least once | Board which are issued at least twice a year. All | |||
annually without the executive board present. This also | Supervisory Board and Audit Committee | |||
applies to the internal auditor, if any. | material is available to the auditors. | |||
The Supervisory Board (through the Audit | ||||
Committee) meets regularly with the auditor | ||||
without the Executive Board present. The Audit | ||||
Committee regularly meets with the internal | ||||
auditor without the Executive Board. | ||||
5.3.2. The Committee recommends that the audit | X | The Supervisory Board has approved the | ||
agreement and auditor's fee be agreed by the board of | agreement with the auditor on the basis of a | |||
directors and the auditor elected by the general meeting | recommendation from the Audit Committee on | |||
based on a recommendation from the audit committee. | the agreement and the fees. | |||
29
30
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Carlsberg A/S published this content on 03 February 2021 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 08 February 2021 09:18:01 UTC.