Fitch Ratings has removed from Rating Watch Negative and downgraded
The Rating Outlook is Negative.
The downgrade and Negative Outlook reflect the near-term materialization of TdP's tax liability, which will result in a material deterioration of its leverage profile, although the exact timing and extent of additional debt financing needed to pay the tax payments remains uncertain. In addition, the company continues to operate in an intense competitive environment amid an uncertain economic backdrop in
Key Rating Drivers
Materialization of Tax Liability: As of
The exact amount, timing, and structure of the payments are not yet known. Fitch expects, according to what the recent shareholders meeting approved, that the company will seek additional financing and potential additional capital contributions to service these payments (in addition to the partial capitalization of shareholder loans which have already been disbursed), and this will affect the company's financial profile. Peruvian companies facing tax liabilities have the option to extend a portion of the final settlement payment up to six years by following standard procedures with the
Leverage Expected to Worsen: Improvements in EBITDA in 2022 resulted in net debt/EBITDA improving to 2.2x as of year-end 2022, from 3.1x in 2021, driven in part by cost savings initiatives. While the extent and timing of new financing to cover near-term material tax payments is not yet known, Fitch expects leverage to materially weaken, as the company is likely to finance a significant portion of the near-term payments with debt financing. Positively, TdP has already received disbursements of a shareholder loan of PEN365 million, which has been partially capitalized. Additional disbursements and capitalizations are possible, but this remains uncertain.
Relatively Weak Profitability, Negative FCF: Fitch expects FCF to gradually improve over the rating horizon but to remain negative and continue to weigh on the company's financial profile. While mobile revenues have mostly recovered off of pandemic lows, fixed revenues have remained weak. EBITDA margins improved impressively in 2022 on cost savings initiatives but remain relatively weak compared to peers in the region.
Fitch expects an acceleration of fiber rollout and low single digit ARPU growth to offset declining demand for fixed voice, generating revenue growth in the low single digits for the fixed business over the rating horizon. A more stable mobile competitive environment, growing demand for broadband, and cost containment efforts should result in modest EBITDA margin expansion over the rating horizon. Fitch forecasts capital intensity of just under 10% while margins will likely only improve marginally as competition spurs network investments, limiting FCF improvement.
Strong Market Shares and Diversification: TdP's business profile, particularly in terms of market share and diversification, remains solid. It is well-diversified between fixed and mobile service offerings despite market share losses in recent years due to intense competition, most notably on the mobile side as Entel and Bitel (
The company plans to focus on expanding and improving its fixed services over the medium term, mainly through the acceleration of fiber deployment. Fitch expects marginal improvement in ARPUs on price increases as consumer spending improves and the product portfolio shifts to higher-value services.
Linkages with
Derivation Summary
In comparison with regional peers in the 'BBB' rating category, TdP's business position is toward the lower end of the category because of its still-leading but weakening market positions in the highly competitive Peruvian telecom industry. The company's financial profile has deteriorated since 2016 due to intense competition. This has caused a general decline in operating margins and cash flow generation, which are now more in line with 'BB' category issuers.
TdP's business position is roughly in line with sister company
TdP is rated three notches below competitor Entel (BBB/Stable), as Entel has been able to capitalize on its improved scale in
Key Assumptions
Fitch's Key Assumptions Within the Rating Case for the Issuer Include
Mobile revenues grow to PEN3.9 billion from PEN3.5 billion over the rating horizon;
Low-single-digit growth in mobile subscribers and growth in ARPUs;
Fixed revenues remaining relatively flat, near PEN3.5 billion over the rating horizon;
Continued double-digit declines in fixed-line voice subscribers, partially offset by broadband subscribers growing in the low single digits, with fixed ARPUs growing in the low-single-digit percentage range;
EBITDA margins gradually improving to around 15.7%, with an improved pricing environment partially offset by some continued cost inflation;
Capital expenditures near 10% of revenues;
Material tax payments pressure FCF.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade
Stabilization of the ratings is dependent on the company achieving stability in market position and margin expansion above forecasts and attaining greater clarity on manageability of tax liability payments;
Sustained neutral or positive FCF generation.
Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action/Downgrade
Continued deterioration of margins and competitive position regardless of credit metrics;
Total debt/EBITDA sustained above 4.5x or net debt/EBITDA above 4.0x;
Unfavorable financing structure of tax payments.
Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario
International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from '
Liquidity and Debt Structure
Uncertain Liquidity: As of
Issuer Profile
Summary of Financial Adjustments
Standard lease adjustments are applied.
REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING
The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.
ESG Considerations
Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg
(C) 2023 Electronic News Publishing, source