Fitch Ratings has assigned
The five-year notes are intended to be issued as green bonds.
The notes will count towards Mizuho's total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirements, as they will be structurally subordinated to the senior liabilities of its subsidiaries. Mizuho met the 18% minimum total external TLAC capital ratio requirement, which excludes buffers for global systemically important banks, capital conservation and countercyclical capital, as of
We expect the company to continue to issue TLAC-eligible debt as required, including to refinance maturing debt, to comfortably meet the requirement with a buffer. Mizuho will downstream the net proceeds of the notes to
Key Rating Drivers
The rating on the notes is aligned with Mizuho's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR), despite the notes' structural subordination features. Fitch aligns Mizuho's holding-company senior debt ratings and IDRs with the IDRs of its operating companies.
This reflects Fitch's view of consolidated supervision and that the holding company's failure and senior-level default risk are similar to that of the wholly owned operating banks, with all entities being eligible for pre-emptive state support. It also takes into account the group's interconnectedness and low holding-company double leverage.
For commentary on Mizuho's key rating drivers and rating sensitivities, please see 'Fitch Affirms MHFG and Subsidiaries at 'A-'; Outlook Stable', published in
Rating Sensitivities
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:
The instrument ratings will be downgraded if Mizuho's Long-Term IDR is downgraded.
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:
The instrument ratings will be upgraded if Mizuho's Long-Term IDR is upgraded.
Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario
International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions and Covered Bond issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from '
Summary of Financial Adjustments
Total assets and total liabilities exclude acceptances and guarantees from
REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING
The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.
ESG Considerations
Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visitwww.fitchratings.com/esg
(C) 2022 Electronic News Publishing, source