● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.
● From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
● The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.
Strengths
● According to sales estimates from analysts polled by Standard & Poor's, the company is among the best with regard to growth.
● The earnings growth currently anticipated by analysts for the coming years is particularly strong.
● Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
● The group's activity appears highly profitable thanks to its outperforming net margins.
● Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
● Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.
● Analysts have consistently raised their revenue expectations for the company, which provides good prospects for the current and next years in terms of revenue growth.
● Analyst opinion has improved significantly over the past four months.
● Consensus analysts have strongly revised their opinion of the company over the past 12 months.
● Historically, the company has been releasing figures that are above expectations.
Weaknesses
● With a 2024 P/E ratio at 25.79 times the estimated earnings, the company operates at rather significant levels of earnings multiples.
● With an enterprise value anticipated at 5.31 times the sales for the current fiscal year, the company turns out to be overvalued.
● In relation to the value of its tangible assets, the company's valuation appears relatively high.
● For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
● The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.