Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements for Purposes of the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995





The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("Act") provides a safe
harbor for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide
prospective information, so long as those statements are identified as
forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements
identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those discussed in the statements. We wish to take advantage of
the "safe harbor" provisions of the Act.



Certain statements in this Report are forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Act, and such statements are intended to qualify for the
protection of the safe harbor provided by the Act. All statements other than
statements of historical fact included in this Report are forward-looking
statements, and such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. You can
identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly
to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements give our current
expectations and projections as to future performance, occurrences and trends,
including statements expressing optimism or pessimism about future results or
events. The words "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "objective," "goal,"
"project," "intend," "plan," "believe," "assume," "will," "should," "may," "can
have," "likely," "target," "forecast," "guide," "guidance," "outlook," "seek,"
"strategy," "future," and similar words or expressions identify forward-looking
statements. Similarly, all statements we make relating to our strategies, plans,
goals, objectives and targets as well as our estimates and projections of
results, sales, earnings, costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates,
initiatives, and the outcomes or impacts of pending or threatened litigation or
regulatory actions are also forward-looking statements.



Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of assumptions and factors
concerning future conditions that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate and
could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, whether made herein,
disclosed previously or in our other releases, reports or filings made with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC" or the "Commission"), are subject
to risks and uncertainties and they are not guarantees of future
performance. Actual results may differ materially from those discussed in
forward-looking statements, thus negatively affecting our business, financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity.



Many of the risks and uncertainties that we face are currently amplified by, and
will continue to be amplified by, factors related to the Chapter 11 Cases (as
defined herein), including:

• our ability to obtain confirmation of a plan of reorganization under the

Chapter 11 Cases and successfully consummate the restructuring, including

by satisfying the conditions and milestones in the Restructuring Support

Agreement (as defined herein);

• our ability to improve our liquidity and long-term capital structure and to


       address our debt service obligations through the restructuring and the
       potential adverse effects of the Chapter 11 Cases on our liquidity and
       results of operation;

• our ability to obtain timely approval by the Bankruptcy Court (as defined

herein) with respect to the motions filed in the Chapter 11 Cases;

• objections to the Company's recapitalization process or other pleadings

filed that could protract the Chapter 11 Cases and third party motions

which may interfere with Company's ability to consummate the restructuring

contemplated by the Restructuring Support Agreement or an alternative


       restructuring;


   •   the length of time that the Company will operate under Chapter 11

protection and the continued availability of operating capital during the

pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases;

• increased administrative and legal costs related to the Chapter 11 process;

• potential delays in the Chapter 11 process due to the effects of the


       COVID-19 pandemic;


                                       38

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

• the effects of the restructuring and the Chapter 11 Cases on the Company

and the interests of various constituents;

• our substantial level of indebtedness and related debt service obligations

and restrictions, including those expected to be imposed by covenants in


       any exit financing, that may limit our operational and financial
       flexibility;

• the Company's ability to access debt or equity markets on favorable terms

or at all;

• risks arising from the delisting of the Company's common stock from the New

York Stock Exchange; and

• our ability to continue as a going concern and our ability to maintain

relationships with suppliers, customers, employees and other third parties


       as a result of such going concern, the restructuring and the Chapter 11
       Cases.


Forward-looking statements are and will be based upon our views and assumptions
regarding future events and operating performance at the time the statements are
made, and are applicable only as of the dates of such statements. We believe the
expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements we make are based on
reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge. However,
forward-looking statements, by their nature, involve assumptions, risks,
uncertainties and other factors, many of these factors are beyond our control,
and any one or a combination of which could materially affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.



Additional important assumptions, risks, uncertainties and other factors
concerning future conditions that could cause actual results and financial
condition to differ materially from our expectations, or cautionary statements,
are disclosed under the sections entitled "Risk Factors" and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in
this Report and in the Form 10-K, and may be discussed from time to time in our
other filings with the SEC, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current
Reports on Form 8-K. All written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to us, or to persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified
in their entirety by these cautionary statements as well as other cautionary
statements that are made from time to time in our other SEC filings and public
communications. You should evaluate all forward-looking statements made in this
Report in the context of these risks and uncertainties.



We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The
important factors referenced above may not contain all of the factors that are
important to you. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will realize the
results or developments we expect or anticipate or, even if substantially
realized, that they will result in the consequences or affect us or our
operations in the way we expect. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update
or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law. You are advised,
however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our
public announcements and SEC filings.



The financial information, discussion and analysis that follow should be read in
conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related
notes included in this Report as well as the financial and other information
included in the Form 10-K.


Current Bankruptcy Proceedings





On June 29, 2020, the Company and certain of the Company's direct and indirect
U.S. subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company Parties") filed voluntary
petitions for relief (the "Chapter 11 Cases") under chapter 11 of title 11 of
the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") in the Southern District of
Texas, Houston Division (the "Bankruptcy Court").



The Chapter 11 Cases are being administered under the caption In re: Covia Holdings Corporation, et al.





For more information regarding the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases, see Liquidity
After Filing the Chapter 11 Cases in this Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 1 to our condensed
consolidated financial statements.



                                       39

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Overview



We are a leading provider of diversified mineral-based and material solutions
for the Industrial and Energy markets. We produce a wide range of specialized
silica sand, nepheline syenite, feldspar, calcium carbonate, clay, and kaolin
products for use in the glass, ceramics, coatings, metals, foundry, polymers,
construction, water filtration, sports and recreation, and oil and gas markets
in North America and around the world. We currently have 33 active mining
facilities with over 25 million tons of annual mineral processing capacity and
two active coating facilities with over 320 thousand tons of annual coating
capacity. Our mining and coating facilities span North America and also include
operations in China and Denmark. Our U.S., Mexico, and Canada operations have
many sites in close proximity to our customer base.



Covia began operating in its current form following a business combination
between Fairmount Santrol Holdings Inc. ("Fairmount Santrol") and Unimin
Corporation ("Unimin") pursuant to which Fairmount Santrol was merged into a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Unimin, Bison Merger Sub, LLC ("Merger Sub"), with
Merger Sub as the surviving entity following the merger (the "Merger"). The
Merger was completed on June 1, 2018 (the "Merger Date").



Our operations are organized into two segments based on the primary end markets
we serve - Energy and Industrial. Our Energy segment offers the oil and gas
industry a comprehensive portfolio of raw frac sand, value-added proppants,
well-cementing additives, gravel-packing media and drilling mud additives. Our
Energy segment products serve hydraulic fracturing operations in the U.S.,
Canada, Argentina, Mexico, China, and northern Europe. Our Industrial segment
provides raw, value-added, and custom-blended products to the glass,
construction, ceramics, metals, foundry, coatings, polymers, sports and
recreation, filtration and various other industries, primarily in North
America.



We believe our segments are complementary. Our ability to sell products to a
wide range of customers across multiple end markets allows us to maximize the
recovery of our reserve base within our mining operations and to mitigate the
cyclicality of our earnings.



Our Strategy



Our strategy is centered on three objectives - growing our Industrial segment's
profitability, repositioning our Energy segment and strengthening our balance
sheet.



Recent Trends and Outlook


Voluntary Reorganization under Chapter 11





On June 29, 2020 ("Petition Date"), the Company Parties commenced voluntary
cases under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. Primary factors causing us to file
for Chapter 11 protection included unsustainable long-term debt obligations and
significant excess operating costs, driven by the economic slowdown caused by
COVID-19.



The Chapter 11 process can be unpredictable and involves significant risks and
uncertainties. As a result of these risks and uncertainties, the amount and
composition of the Company's assets, liabilities, officers and/or directors
could be significantly different following the outcome of the Chapter 11 cases,
and the description of the Company's operations, properties and liquidity and
capital resources included in this Report may not accurately reflect its
operations, properties and liquidity and capital resources following the Chapter
11 process. For further discussion, see Note 1 to our condensed consolidated
financial statements and those risk factors discussed under "Risk Factors" in
Part II, Item 1A of this Report.



The Company expects to continue working on a business plan of reorganization and
engage with certain of the Company's creditors under its Credit and Guaranty
Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2018 (as amended or otherwise modified from time
to time, the "Term Loan Agreement") and the Bankruptcy Court in order to confirm
a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, as applicable. The Company Parties have
received initial approval from the Bankruptcy Court to maintain ordinary course
operations and uphold their respective commitments to their stakeholders,
including employees, customers, and vendors, during the restructuring process,
subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the
applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The commencement of the Chapter 11
Cases constituted an event of default under, and resulted in the acceleration
of, substantially all of the Company Parties' debt obligations. While the
Chapter 11 Cases are pending, the Company Parties do not anticipate making
interest payments due under their respective debt obligations, except for the
Company's letter of credit facility, which was entered into after the
commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases.



                                       40

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company Parties entered into a
Restructuring Support Agreement (the "Restructuring Support Agreement") with
certain creditors (the "Consenting Stakeholders"), which contemplated
agreed-upon terms for a prearranged plan of reorganization (the "Plan"). Under
the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Consenting Stakeholders agreed, subject
to certain terms and conditions, to support a financial restructuring of the
existing debt of, existing equity interests in, and certain other obligations of
the Company Parties, pursuant to the Plan as filed with the Bankruptcy Court.
Under the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Plan must be confirmed and
declared effective by the Bankruptcy Court no later than 150 days after the
Petition Date. Under the Bankruptcy Code, a majority in number and two-thirds in
amount of each impaired class of claims must approve the Plan. The Restructuring
Support Agreement requires the Consenting Stakeholders to vote in favor of and
support the Plan, and the Consenting Stakeholders represent the requisite number
of votes for the Term Loan's class of creditors entitled to vote on the Plan.
The Restructuring Support Agreement may be terminated by one or more of the
Consenting Stakeholders or the Company, or the Bankruptcy Court may refuse to
confirm the Plan.


For more information regarding the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases, see Liquidity After Filing the Chapter 11 Cases and Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.





COVID-19 Pandemic



The COVID-19 pandemic and related economic impacts have created significant
volatility and uncertainty in our business. Oil prices have declined sharply in
2020 due to lower demand which significantly reduced well completion activity in
North America and the corresponding demand for proppants.  Despite efforts to
reduce the supply of oil from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries
and other oil producing nations ("OPEC+"), excess oil inventory remains and has
resulted in a severe downturn in completion activity for the foreseeable
future.



The COVID-19 pandemic has also caused, and is likely to continue to cause,
economic, market and other disruptions throughout North America, which affected
our Industrial segment throughout the first half of 2020. In particular, we
experienced declines in volumes in the second quarter of 2020 from customers who
either experienced reduced end market demand or were temporarily idled due to
quarantine mandates. These reduced volumes occurred across most of our end
markets within our Industrial segment. Although we experienced an increase in
volumes in the latter half of the second quarter of 2020, it remains unclear how
long the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic will negatively impact longer-term
demand for our products.



Certain areas of our business began to stabilize in June 2020 particularly in
our Industrial end market businesses, however we expect a significant impact to
revenue and profitability for the remainder of 2020 across both segments. In
response to these market conditions, the Company has taken several steps to
further reduce active capacity within our Energy segment and lower operational
and overhead costs throughout the Company. These actions include the reduction
of productive capacity of our Kermit, Crane, Seiling and Utica facilities, and
reducing headcount across the Company while tightly controlling discretionary
spending across the Company.



The full extent to which our business is affected by the COVID-19 pandemic will
depend on various factors and consequences beyond our control, including the
duration and magnitude of the pandemic, additional actions by businesses and
governments in response to the pandemic, the speed and effectiveness of
responses to combat the virus, and the effects of low oil prices on the global
economy generally. These effects could have a significant adverse effect on the
markets in which we conduct our business and the demand for our products and
services.



Energy Proppant Trends



Demand for proppant is significantly influenced by the level of well completions
by exploration and production ("E&P") and oil field services ("OFS") companies,
which depends largely on the current and anticipated profitability of developing
oil and natural gas reserves. The type of proppant used in wells depends on a
variety of factors, including cost and desired size, sphericity, roundness, and
crush strength. Over the last two years, substantial "local" frac sand reserves
were developed primarily within the Permian, Eagle Ford, and Mid-Con basins. The
quality of local proppants differs from Northern White Sand in that local
proppant generally possesses lower crush strength and less sphericity, however
their delivered costs are substantially lower. Given their lower costs, demand
for local proppant products has strengthened considerably and has taken
substantial market share from Northern White Sand in the markets where it is
available.



                                       41

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Proppant supply grew throughout 2018 and in early 2019, driven primarily by
significant growth in the supply of new local plants in the Permian, Eagle Ford,
and Mid-Con basins. Most local plants were developed to supply local basins in
which they are located and lack the logistical infrastructure to economically
ship product to other basins. We commissioned local facilities in Crane, Texas
and Kermit, Texas in the Permian basin in the third quarter of 2018, each with
three million tons of annual production capacity, and a local facility in
Seiling, Oklahoma in the Mid-Con basin in the fourth quarter of 2018 with two
million tons of annual production capacity. During the second quarter of 2020,
due to the continued reduction in demand in the Permian Basin, the Company
reduced the production capacity of its Kermit, Crane, Seiling and Utica
facilities.



The total amount of local sand supply brought to market has significantly
exceeded market demand and has resulted in lower volumes and prices for
Covia. In response to these dynamics, Covia has taken significant steps to match
its productive capacity to market demand through the idling of 25 million tons
of capacity over the last two years, including operations at mines in Utica,
Illinois; Kasota, Minnesota; Shakopee, Minnesota; Brewer, Missouri; Voca, Texas;
Maiden Rock, Wisconsin; and Wexford, Michigan and at our resin coating
facilities in Cutler, Missouri; Guion, Arkansas; and Roff,
Oklahoma. Additionally, we reduced production capacity and total production at
certain of our Northern White sand plants. This has allowed us to lower fixed
plant costs and consolidate volumes into lower cost operations. In addition, the
Company recorded a $1.4 billion impairment to its Northern White and Seiling
asset groups at the end of 2019. The reduced capacity of the Kermit, Texas and
Crane, Texas facilities has resulted in an impairment loss recognized in the
three-months ended June 30, 2020 of approximately $288.2 million.



Following the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, oil prices declined into negative
levels, resulting in a dramatic decline in completions activity which severely
impacted our sales volumes of frac sand. Inventory levels of oil, together with
the low price of both oil and natural gas are expected to depress demand for our
products for the foreseeable future.



Industrial End Market Trends



Our Industrial segment's products are sold to customers in the glass,
construction, ceramics, metals, foundry, coatings, polymers, sports and
recreation, filtration and various other industries. The sales in our Industrial
segment correlate strongly with overall economic activity levels as reflected in
the gross domestic product, unemployment levels, vehicle production and growth
in the housing market. In the first quarter of 2020, overall sales within our
Industrial segment remained solid with certain sectors (including containerized
glass and coatings and polymers) providing above-average growth due to consumer,
regulatory and/or manufacturing trends. Beginning in the second quarter of 2020,
with the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, demand for many of our industrial
products began to decline compared to the second quarter of 2019 due to lower
demand for end market applications and disruptions to our customers production
facilities. Over the long term, we expect our Industrial segment to align with
rates similar to U.S. gross domestic product ("GDP") growth.



Key Metrics Used to Evaluate Our Business





Our management uses a variety of financial and operational metrics to analyze
our performance across our Energy and Industrial segments. We determine our
reportable segments based on the primary industries we serve, our management
structure and the financial information reviewed by our chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. We evaluate
the performance of our segments based on their volumes sold, average selling
price, and segment contribution margin and associated per ton metrics. We
evaluate the performance of our business based on company-wide operating cash
flows, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
("EBITDA"), costs incurred that are considered non-operating, and Adjusted
EBITDA. Segment contribution margin, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA are defined in
the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section below. We view these metrics as
important factors in evaluating profitability and review these measurements
frequently to analyze trends and make decisions, and believe these metrics
provide beneficial information for investors for similar reasons.



Segment Gross Profit



Segment gross profit is defined as segment revenue less segment cost of sales,
excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses, selling, general,
and administrative costs, and corporate costs.



                                       42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Non-GAAP Financial Measures


Segment contribution margin, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures used by management and certain external users of our financial statements in evaluating our operating performance.





Segment contribution margin is a key metric we use to evaluate our operating
performance and to determine resource allocation between segments. We define
segment contribution margin as segment revenue less segment cost of sales,
excluding any depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses, selling,
general, and administrative costs, and operating costs of idled facilities and
excess railcar capacity. Segment contribution margin per ton is defined as
segment contribution margin divided by tons sold. Segment contribution margin is
not a measure of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be
considered an alternative or superior to measures derived in accordance with
GAAP. Refer to Note 19 for further detail, including a reconciliation of
operating loss from continuing operations, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure, to segment contribution margin.



We define EBITDA as net income before interest expense, income tax expense
(benefit), depreciation, depletion and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined
as EBITDA before non-cash stock-based compensation and certain other income or
expenses, including restructuring and other charges, impairments, reorganization
items, net and Merger-related expenses. Beginning in the first quarter of 2019,
we also include non-cash lease expense of intangible assets in our calculation
of Adjusted EBITDA as a result of the adoption of ASC 842.



We believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful because they allow management
to more effectively evaluate our normalized operations from period to period as
well as provide an indication of cash flow generation from operations before
investing or financing activities. Further, we expect that significant impacts
will result from the reorganization under the Chapter 11 Cases, including the
settlement of prepetition liabilities for amounts lesser than the carrying
amounts at June 30, 2020, as well as professional fees including advisory and
legal fees as we complete our reorganization process. Accordingly, EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA do not take into consideration our financing methods, capital
structure or capital expenditure needs. As previously noted, Adjusted EBITDA
excludes certain non-operational income and/or costs, the removal of which
improves comparability of operating results across reporting periods. However,
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools and should not
be considered as alternatives to, or more meaningful than, net income as
determined in accordance with GAAP as indicators of our operating
performance. Certain items excluded from EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are
significant components in understanding and assessing a company's financial
performance, such as a company's cost of capital and tax structure, as well as
the historic costs of depreciable assets, none of which are components of EBITDA
or Adjusted EBITDA.



Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow
for management's discretionary use, as it does not consider certain cash
requirements such as interest payments, tax payments and debt service
requirements. Adjusted EBITDA contains certain other limitations, including the
failure to reflect our cash expenditures, cash requirements for working capital
needs and cash costs to replace assets being depreciated and amortized, and
excludes certain non-operational charges. We compensate for these limitations by
relying primarily on our GAAP results and by using Adjusted EBITDA only as a
supplement. Non-GAAP financial information should not be considered in isolation
or viewed as a substitute for measures of performance as defined by GAAP.



Although we attempt to determine EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in a manner that is
consistent with other companies in our industry, our computation of EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of
other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the methods of
calculation. We believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are widely followed
measures of operating performance.



                                       43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:





                                             Three Months Ended June
                                                       30,                          Six Months Ended June 30,
                                               2020           2019                     2020           2019
                                                 (in thousands)                           (in thousands)
Reconciliation of EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA

Net loss from continuing operations
attributable to Covia                       $ (435,622 )   $  (34,394 )             $ (436,563 )   $   (86,639 )
Interest expense, net                           59,340         27,866                   82,923          53,002
Benefit from income taxes                       (1,407 )       (5,136 )                (29,659 )        (9,190 )
Depreciation, depletion, and
amortization expense                            31,209         59,204                   66,039         117,299
EBITDA                                        (346,480 )       47,540                 (317,260 )        74,472

Non-cash stock compensation expense1               180          3,316                    1,830           6,082
Asset impairments2                             298,299              -                  298,299               -
Restructuring and other charges3                29,414         12,124                   34,913          14,126
Reorganization items, net4                      24,316              -                   24,316               -
Loss on sale of subsidiary5                        964              -                      964               -
Costs and expenses related to the
Merger and integration6                              -            245                        -             896
Non-cash charges relating to
operating leases7                                    -          2,100                        -           4,200
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)                  $    6,693     $   65,325               $   43,062     $    99,776
_____________

(1)  Represents the non-cash expense for stock-based awards issued to our employees and outside
directors. Stock compensation expenses are reported in Selling, general and administrative expenses.
(2)  Represents expenses associated with the impairment of long-lived assets in the Energy segment in 2020.
(3)  Represents expenses associated with restructuring activities as a result of the Merger and idled
facilities, strategic costs, other charges related to executive severance and benefits, as well as
restructuring-related SG&A expenses.
(4)  Represents the Term Loan deferred financing costs, net that were expensed as a result of the Company's
Chapter 11 Cases.
(5)  Represents the final working capital adjustments associated with the sale of our Winchester & Western
Railroad.
(6)  Costs and expenses related to the Merger and integration include legal, accounting, financial advisory
services, severance, integration and other expenses.
(7)  Represents the amount of operating lease expense incurred in 2019 related to intangible assets that were
reclassified to Operating right-of-use assets, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a result of the
adoption of ASC 842. The expense, previously recognized as non-cash amortization expense, is now recognized in
Cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation, depletion, and amortization shown separately) on the Consolidated
Statements of Loss.


Results of Operations



                                           Three Months Ended June 30,            Six Months Ended June 30,
                                            2020                 2019              2020               2019
                                                 (in thousands)                        (in thousands)

Operating Data
Energy
Tons sold                                       1,323                4,582             4,794             9,014
Revenues                               $       68,612       $      251,547     $     220,985       $   487,622
Segment gross profit (loss)                   (10,279 )             33,858             4,307            48,922
Segment contribution margin            $        3,380       $       40,912     $      24,894       $    62,931
Industrial
Tons sold                                       2,844                3,596             6,160             7,161
Revenues                               $      150,921       $      193,389     $     321,208       $   385,560
Segment gross profit                           48,578               65,109           102,778           116,731
Segment contribution margin            $       48,578       $       65,109     $     102,778       $   116,731
Totals
Tons sold                                       4,167                8,178            10,954            16,175
Revenues                               $      219,533       $      444,936     $     542,193       $   873,182
Segment gross profit                           38,299               98,967           107,085           165,653
Segment contribution margin            $       51,958       $      106,021     $     127,672       $   179,662




                                       44

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2019





Revenues



Revenues were $219.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared
to $444.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019, a decrease of $225.4
million, or 51%. Volumes were 4.2 million tons for the three months ended June
30, 2020 compared to 8.2 million tons for the three months ended June 30, 2019,
a decrease of 4.0 million tons, or 49%. Our volumes and revenues decreased as a
result of declining demand across both segments, mainly in connection with the
drop in oil production and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on key
end-markets served by our business. Likewise, a decline in the average selling
price during the second quarter of 2020 compared to the second quarter of 2019
unfavorably impacted revenues.



Revenues in the Energy segment were $68.6 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2020 compared to $251.5 million for the three months ended June 30,
2019, a decrease of $182.9 million, or 73%. The decline in revenues was driven
by lower sales volumes and realized pricing due to weakened market conditions
within the Energy segment during the three months ended June 30, 2020. Factors
driving the lower revenues included steep declines in oil prices and
significantly lower completion activity. Volumes sold into the Energy segment
were 1.3 million tons in the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to 4.6
million tons in the three months ended June 30, 2019, a decrease of 3.3 million
tons, or 72%.



Revenues in the Industrial segment were $150.9 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2020 compared to $193.4 million for the three months ended June
30, 2019, a decrease of $42.5 million, or 22%. Volumes sold into the Industrial
segment were 2.8 million tons in the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared
to 3.6 million tons for the three months ended June 30, 2019, a decrease of 0.8
million tons, or 22%. Revenue and volume decreases were primarily attributed to
the sale of our Calera, Alabama lime processing facility and Winchester &
Western Railroad in the third quarter of 2019, which accounted for $15.3 million
of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2019, and lower
transportation-related revenues for freight charged to customers.



Segment Gross Profit (Loss) and Contribution Margin





Segment gross profit was $38.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020
compared to gross profit of $99.0 million for the three months ended June 30,
2019, a decrease of $60.7 million, or 61%. The segment gross profit decrease was
primarily due to the decrease in sales volumes, pricing, and railcar lease
expense for the three months ended June 30, 2020. Due to the impairment charge
recognized in the fourth quarter of 2019, which significantly reduced our
"operating right-of-use assets" recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets, we are recognizing less lease expense, largely related to railcars, in
the current period versus the prior year comparable period. Hybrid facilities,
which produce for both the Industrial and Energy segments, were negatively
impacted by lower utilization as demand declined.



Segment contribution margin was $52.0 million in the three months ended June 30,
2020 and excludes $13.7 million of operating costs of idled facilities and
excess railcar costs. Segment contribution margin was $106.0 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2019 and excludes $1.1 million of operating costs of
idled facilities and $6.0 million of excess railcar capacity costs. These
excluded costs are entirely attributable to the Energy segment.



Energy segment gross profit was a loss of $10.3 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2020 compared to profit of $33.9 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2019, a decrease of $44.2 million, or 130%. The Energy segment
gross profit decrease was primarily due to lower volumes driven by an
oversupplied market as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.



Industrial segment gross profit was $48.6 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2020 compared to $65.1 million for the three months ended June 30,
2019, a decrease of $16.5 million, or 25%. The decrease in Industrial segment
gross profit was primarily due to reductions in demand and sales volume caused
by the North American business closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the
sale of our Calera, Alabama processing facility and Winchester & Western
Railroad in the third quarter of 2019. Offsetting these volume declines were
plant cost improvements, which included reductions in workforce and the
reduction of production capacity at our Kermit, Crane, Seiling and Utica
facilities, compared to the second quarter of 2019.



                                       45

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses





Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") decreased $8.9 million, or
23%, to $29.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $38.6
million for the three months ended June 30, 2019. SG&A for the three months
ended June 30, 2020 included $0.2 million of stock compensation expense compared
to $3.3 million of stock compensation expense in the three months ended June 30,
2019, driven by lower grant activity in the current year versus the prior
year. The remainder of the decrease is primarily due to the effects of headcount
reductions, which drove lower salaries and benefit levels, as well as other
overhead cost reductions since June 30, 2019.



Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization





Depreciation, depletion and amortization ("DD&A") decreased $28.0 million, or
47%, to $31.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to
$59.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2019. Depreciation of property,
plant, and equipment and amortization expense decreased in the second quarter of
2020 compared to the second quarter of 2019 due to a lower depreciable base of
existing property, plant, and equipment as well as the sale of the Calera Lime
facility. In the fourth quarter of 2019, an impairment charge of approximately
$1.4 billion, primarily related to the long-lived assets of our Energy segment,
was the driver of the lower depreciation in the current period.



Asset Impairments



In the three months ended June 30, 2020, we incurred $298.3 million of asset
impairments related to long-lived assets in our Energy segment. The majority of
these impairments were due to the write-down of mineral reserves and other
long-lived assets of Energy assets within our West Texas facilities in
connection with the decision to reduce the production capacity of our Kermit,
Crane, and Seiling facilities, thereby reducing the projected long-term cash
flows and resulting in a determination that the carrying value was not
recoverable.



Restructuring and Other Charges





In the three months ended June 30, 2020, we incurred $29.4 million of
restructuring charges, which included legal and advisory expenses related to the
preparation for our reorganization plan filed under Chapter 11 as well as
severance costs related to a reduction in force. In the three months ended June
30, 2019, we recorded $9.5 million in restructuring charges, primarily related
to separation and relocation costs as a result of Merger integration activities
and minimum quantity penalties incurred as a result of utility contracts in
connection with reduced production at idled facilities. In the three months
ended June 30, 2019, we incurred $5.5 million of other charges related to
executive severance and benefits.



Other Operating Expense, net



Other operating expense, net decreased $1.4 million to $0.3 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $1.7 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2019. The decrease is primarily attributable to $0.5 million gain
on disposal of fixed assets and $1.0 million expense related to final working
capital adjustments associated with the sale of our Winchester & Western
Railroad, which are included in the three months ended June 30, 2020.



Loss from Operations



Operating loss from continuing operations increased approximately $340.6 million
to $350.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $10.1
million for the three months ended June 30, 2019. The change in operating loss
from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2020 was
primarily due to the asset impairments recognized in the period as well as the
lower profitability in the Energy segment.



                                       46

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Interest Expense, net



Interest expense, net increased $31.4 million to $59.3 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $27.9 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2019. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to the
recognition of $35.8 million in interest expense related to our derivative
financial instruments no longer being designated as cash flow hedging
instruments due to the event of default under the agreements governing our
interest rate swaps as a result of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases. Due to
the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases on June 29, 2020, the forecasted interest
payments which these instruments were intended to hedge against are no longer
considered probable.



Reorganization items, net



In the three months ended June 30, 2020, we incurred $24.3 million of
reorganization items, net related to Term Loan deferred financing costs that
were written off as a result of the Company's Chapter 11 Cases. We did not
recognize reorganization items related to professional fees for legal,
consulting and advisory services for the three months ended June 30, 2020 due to
the proximity of the bankruptcy filing date with quarter end. We expect to incur
significant professional fees related to the bankruptcy during the petition
period. Prior to the Chapter 11 filing, we incurred significant professional
advisory costs which are recorded in Restructuring and Other Charges. We did not
record reorganization items in the three months ended June 30, 2019.



Other Non-Operating Expense, net





Other non-operating expense, net increased $1.1 million to $2.7 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $1.6 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2019. The increase is primarily due to an increase in pension
settlement accounting charges in the second quarter of 2020 compared to the
second quarter of 2019 due to the level of lump sum retiree distributions made
in the current period versus the prior period.



Benefit for Income Taxes



Benefit for income taxes decreased $3.7 million to $1.4 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2020 compared to a benefit of $5.1 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2019. Loss before income taxes increased $397.5 million to
$437.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to a loss of
$39.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019. The decrease in benefit
from income taxes was primarily attributable to a valuation allowance set up on
deferred taxes.



The effective tax rate was 0.3% and 13.0% for the three months ended June 30,
2020 and 2019, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily
attributable to a valuation allowance set up on deferred taxes. The provision
for income taxes for interim periods is determined using an estimate of our
annual effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items that are taken into
account in the relevant period. Each quarter, we update our estimate of the
annual effective tax rate. If our estimated effective tax rate changes, we make
a cumulative adjustment.



In response to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 27, 2020,
President Trump signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security ("CARES") Act. The CARES Act enacts a number of economic relief
measures, including the infusion of various tax cash benefits into negatively
affected companies to ease the impact of the pandemic. We are still assessing
the impact of CARES Act. The CARES Act included provisions allowing net
operating losses arising in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, and
before January 1, 2021 to be carried back to each of the five tax years
preceding the tax year of such loss. In addition, the CARES Act removed the
limitation that net operating losses generated after 2017 could only offset 80%
of taxable income. For the quarter ending March 31, 2020, we recorded a discrete
benefit of $29.3 million resulting from this change because these losses now
eligible for utilization were estimated as not realizable prior to the CARES
Act. No tax benefit was recorded for the period ending June 30, 2020.



Net Loss Attributable to Covia





Net loss attributable to Covia increased $401.2 million to $435.6 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to a loss of $34.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to the asset impairments, lower
profitability in the Energy segment and expenses related to the Chapter 11 Cases
incurred in the three months ended June 30, 2020 discussed above.



                                       47

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Adjusted EBITDA



Adjusted EBITDA decreased $58.6 million to $6.7 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2020 compared to $65.3 million for the three months ended June
30, 2019. Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2020 excludes the
impact of $0.2 million of non-cash stock compensation expense, $298.3 million in
asset impairments, $29.4 million in restructuring and other charges, and $24.3
million in reorganization items, net. The change in Adjusted EBITDA is largely
due to the profitability, SG&A and other factors discussed above.



Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2019





Revenues



Revenues were $542.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to
revenues of $873.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, a decrease of
$331.0 million, or 38%. Volumes were 11.0 million tons for the six months ended
June 30, 2020 compared to total volumes of 16.2 million tons for the six months
ended June 30, 2019, a decrease of 5.2 million tons, or 32%. Our revenues
decreased largely due to pricing and volumes declines in the Energy business,
which resulted from the reduction of E&P activities in North America, coupled
with the broad impacts of the interruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.



Revenues in the Energy segment were $221.0 million for the six months ended June
30, 2020 compared to $487.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2019. Volumes sold into the Energy segment were 4.8 million tons in the six
months ended June 30, 2020 compared to 9.0 million tons in the six months ended
June 30, 2019, a decrease of 4.2 million tons, or 47%. Aside from the
disruptions experienced at the macro- and industry-specific levels, and the
resulting price and volume impacts, revenues also decreased due to reduced
production capacity and total production at certain of our plants since the
second quarter of 2019, which were concentrated on the Northern White production
facilities.



Revenues in the Industrial segment were $321.2 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2020 compared to $385.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019,
a decrease of $64.4 million, or 17%.  Volumes sold into the Industrial segment
were 6.2 million tons in the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to 7.2
million tons for the six months ended June 30, 2019, a decrease of 1.0 million
tons, or 14%. Total Industrial revenue decreases are primarily attributable to
lower transportation-related revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2020.
Transportation-related revenues occurred on a greater proportion of Industrial
segment shipments in the six months ended June 30, 2019 when compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2020. Revenues also decreased when compared to the prior
six-month period based on product mix shift and lower volumes due to reduced
demand resulting from the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic across the
end-markets we serve through our Industrial segment.



Segment Gross Profit and Segment Contribution Margin





Segment gross profit was $107.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020
compared to segment gross profit of $165.6 million for the six months ended June
30, 2019, a decrease of $58.5 million, or 35%. The segment gross profit decrease
was primarily due to lower volumes as a result of the proppant market downturn
which caused downward pricing pressure, lower volumes and a reduction in
profitability. Additionally, the Covid-19 pandemic caused reductions in demand
across industrial end markets in 2020. Partially offsetting these impacts were
reductions in terminal operating costs and railcar lease expense in the current
year. Due to the impairment charge recognized in the fourth quarter of 2019,
which significantly reduced our "operating right-of-use assets" recorded on our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, we are recognizing less lease expense,
largely related to railcars, in the current period versus the prior year
comparable period.



Segment contribution margin was $127.7 million in the six months ended June 30,
2020 and further excludes $9.4 million of operating costs of idled facilities
and $11.2 million of excess railcar capacity costs. Segment contribution margin
was $179.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2019 and further excludes
$2.0 million of operating costs of idled facilities and $12.0 million of excess
railcar capacity costs. These excluded costs are entirely attributable to the
Energy segment.



Energy segment gross profit was $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2020 compared to $48.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, a
decrease of $44.6 million, or 91%. The Energy segment gross profit decrease was
primarily due to lower volumes, downward pricing pressure and related reduction
in profitability as a result of the proppant market declines.



                                       48

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Industrial segment gross profit was $102.8 million for the six months ended June
30, 2020 compared to $116.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, a
decrease of $13.9 million, or 12%. Volume declines in the second quarter of 2020
were a result of declining volumes and revenues driven by the Covid-19 pandemic
which impacted the end markets the Company serves. For the six months ended June
30, 2019, the Industrial segment gross profit included $0.6 million of expense
related to the write-up of legacy Fairmount Santrol's inventories to fair value
as a result of the Merger under GAAP.



Selling, General and Administrative Expenses





SG&A decreased $17.4 million, or 22%, to $63.2 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2020 compared to $80.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2019. SG&A for the six months ended June 30, 2020 includes stock compensation
expense of $1.8 million. The decrease in stock compensation for the six months
ended June 30, 2020 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2019 was primarily
due to the decrease in awards granted in 2020. SG&A for the six months ended
June 30, 2019 included $6.1 million of stock compensation. The remainder of the
decrease is primarily due to expense reduction initiatives and headcount
rationalization.



Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization





Depreciation, depletion and amortization decreased $51.3 million, or 44%, to
$66.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to $117.3 million
in the six months ended June 30, 2019. Depreciation of property, plant, and
equipment and amortization expense decreased in the first half of 2020 compared
to the first half of 2019 due to a lower depreciable base of existing property,
plant, and equipment. In the fourth quarter of 2019, an impairment charge of
approximately $1.4 billion, primarily related to the long-lived assets of our
Energy segment, was the driver of the lower depreciation in the current period.



Asset Impairments



We recorded impairment charges of $298.3 million related to property, plant and
equipment in our Seiling Oklahoma and our West Texas asset group for the six
months ended June 30, 2020, due to lower anticipated sales in the future at our
local sand facilities. We did not incur asset impairments for the six months
ended June 30, 2019.


Restructuring and Other Charges





We incurred restructuring and other charges of $34.9 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2020, primarily related to separation costs and professional fees
incurred in preparation of our petition related to our Chapter 11 Cases, as well
as ramp down costs at idled facilities.  We incurred restructuring and other
charges of $11.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2019 primarily related
to executive severance and benefits charges, as well as costs associated with
idling of facilities in the first half of 2019.



Other Operating Income, net



Other operating income, net decreased $2.8 million to $1.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $4.7 million in the six months ended June
30, 2019. Other operating income, net for the six months ended June 30, 2019
included the income related to realization of customary take-or-pay provisions
of certain customer supply agreements. Additionally, for the six months ended
June 30, 2019, we recorded $1.9 million on loss on disposal of fixed assets and
income related to easements granted for consideration on certain of our
properties in Mexico and Virginia.



Loss from Operations



Operating loss from continuing operations increased $314.3 million to a loss of
$353.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to operating loss
of $39.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019. The change in operating
loss from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was
largely due to the asset impairments recognized in the period, lower
profitability in the Energy segment and restructuring and other charges of $34.9
million, offset by other operating income as noted above.



                                       49

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Interest Expense, net



Interest expense, net increased $29.9 million to $82.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $53.0 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2019. The increase in interest expense is due to the loss recognized on
long-term interest rate swaps that were de-designated as cash flow hedges for
accounting purposes in the second quarter of 2020, as a result of the event of
default under the agreements governing our interest rate swaps in connection
with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, resulting in deferred losses being
immediately recognized as interest expense. Due to the filing of the Chapter 11
Cases on June 29, 2020, the forecasted interest payments which these instruments
were intended to hedge against are no longer considered probable. This was
offset slightly by a reduction in the principal on the Term Loan balance in the
fourth quarter of 2019 as a result of the voluntary repurchase of approximately
$63.0 million of outstanding debt and normal scheduled amortization payments, as
well as the decrease in interest rates in the first half of 2020 compared to the
first half of 2019. The interest rate was 5.4% and 6.3% for the six months ended
June 30, 2020 and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively.



Reorganization items, net



In the six months ended June 30, 2020, we incurred $24.3 million of
reorganization items, net related to Term Loan deferred financing costs that
were expensed as a result of the Company's Chapter 11 Cases. We did not
recognize reorganization items related to professional fees for legal,
consulting and advisory services for the six months ended June 30, 2020 due to
the proximity of the bankruptcy filing date with quarter end. We expect to incur
significant professional fees related to the bankruptcy during the petition
period. We did not record reorganization items, net in the six months ended June
30, 2019.


Other Non-Operating Expense, net





Other non-operating expense, net increased $1.8 million to $5.6 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $3.8 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2019. The increase is due to the acceleration of previously deferred
pension-related expenses as a result of settlement accounting application in the
first half of 2020 as distributions exceeded the current period service and
interest cost recognized.



Benefit for Income Taxes



Benefit for income taxes increased $20.5 million to a benefit of $29.7 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to benefit of $9.2 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2019. Loss before income taxes increased $370.5
million to a loss of $466.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020
compared to a loss of $95.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019. The
increase in tax benefit is primarily attributable to a discrete benefit
resulting from provisions of the CARES Act allowing for increased carryback and
utilization of net operating losses.



The effective tax rate was 6.4% and 9.6% for six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to a valuation allowance set up on deferred taxes offset by a discrete benefit resulting from provisions of the CARES Act allowing for increased carryback and utilization of net operating losses.

Net Loss Attributable to Covia





Net loss attributable to Covia increased $350.0 million, or 404%, to a loss of
$436.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to a loss of
$86.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019. The change in net income
attributable to Covia is primarily due to decreases in revenues and gross profit
and increases in SG&A, asset impairments and restructuring and
other charges discussed above.



Adjusted EBITDA



Adjusted EBITDA decreased $56.7 million to $43.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2020 compared to $99.8 million for the six months ended June 30,
2019. Adjusted EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2020 excludes the impact
of $1.8 million of non-cash stock compensation expense, $34.9 million in
restructuring and other related charges, $24.3 in reorganization items, net
related to the non-cash effects of the Chapter 11 Cases, and $298.3 million
related to impairment charges incurred associated with the idling of our
facility in Kermit, Texas. The change in Adjusted EBITDA is largely due to the
revenues, gross profit, and SG&A factors discussed above.



                                       50

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liquidity and Capital Resources





Overview



In general, our liquidity is principally used to service our debt, meet our
working capital needs, and invest in both maintenance and growth capital
expenditures. Due to impacts of the macroenvironment (including the impacts of
the COVID-19 pandemic), industry, and other company-specific factors, we have
taken significant actions to reduce our working capital requirements and our
overhead costs, monetize certain non-core assets within our portfolio and
maintain adequate liquidity. Historically, we have met our liquidity and capital
investment needs with funds generated from operations and the issuance of debt,
if necessary. Due to our current leverage profile, the maturity of our long-term
debt, unfavorable long-term contracts and outlook of the key markets in which we
operate, we executed the Restructuring Support Agreement with certain creditors
and voluntarily filed the Chapter 11 Cases on June 29, 2020 in order to
accelerate our strategic transformation and facilitate a financial
restructuring.



Our principal sources of liquidity are cash on-hand and cash flow from
operations, both now and in the near future. We have not secured any financing
under debtor-in-possession financing and currently anticipate our liquidity
needs will be satisfied during the Chapter 11 Cases by cash on-hand and expected
cash flow from operations during the period. Our operations are capital
intensive and short-term capital expenditures related to certain strategic
projects can be substantial.



Term Loan



Interest on the Term Loan accrues at a per annum rate of either (at our option)
(a) LIBOR plus a spread or (b) the alternate base rate plus a spread, subject to
a minimum LIBOR floor of 1%. The spread will vary depending on our total net
leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of debt (less up to $150 million of cash)
to EBITDA for the most recent four fiscal quarter period, as follows:



                                                                 Term Loan
                                               Applicable Margin for   Applicable Margin for
Leverage Ratio                                   Eurodollar Loans            ABR Loans
Greater than or equal to 2.50x                         4.00%                

3.00%


Greater than or equal to 2.0x and less than
2.50x                                                  3.75%                

2.75%


Greater than or equal to 1.50x and less
than 2.0x                                              3.50%                   2.50%
Less than 1.50x                                        3.25%                   2.25%



The table below provides certain financial metrics for guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries for the six months ended June 30, 2020:





                  Guarantor       Non-Guarantor        Total
Revenues          $  443,137     $        99,056     $  542,193
Gross profit          58,142              48,943        107,085
EBITDA              (345,851 )            28,591       (317,260 )
Adjustments          360,322                   -        360,322
Adjusted EBITDA   $   14,471     $        28,591     $   43,062




The Term Loan contains customary representations and warranties, affirmative
covenants, negative covenants and events of default. Negative covenants include,
among others, limitations on debt, liens, asset sales, mergers, consolidations
and fundamental changes, dividends and repurchases of equity securities,
repayments or redemptions of subordinated debt, investments, transactions with
affiliates, restrictions on granting liens to secure obligations, restrictions
on subsidiary distributions, changes in the conduct of the business, amendments
and waivers in organizational documents and junior debt instruments and changes
in the fiscal year. The filing of the Chapter 11 Cases constituted an event of
default under the Term Loan.


See Note 5 in the consolidated financial statements included in this Report for further detail regarding the Term Loan.





As of June 30, 2020, we had outstanding Term Loan borrowings of $1.56 billion
and cash on-hand of $250.3 million. These outstanding balances, as well as the
accrued interest thereon, have been classified as Liabilities Subject to
Compromise in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.



                                       51

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Receivables Facility



On March 31, 2020, we entered into a Receivables Financing Agreement ("RFA") by
and among (i) Covia, as initial servicer, (ii) Covia Financing LLC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Covia, as borrower ("Covia Financing"), (iii) the
persons from time to time party thereto, as lenders, (iv) PNC Bank, National
Association, as LC bank and as administrative agent ("PNC"), and (v) PNC Capital
Markets LLC, as structuring agent ("Structuring Agent"). In connection with the
RFA, on March 31, 2020, Covia, as originator and servicer, and Covia Financing,
as the buyer, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement ("PSA"), and various of
Covia's subsidiaries, as sub-originators ("Sub-Originators"), and Covia, as the
buyer and servicer, entered into the Sub-Originator Purchase and Sale Agreement
("Sub-PSA"). Together, the RFA, the PSA, and the Sub-PSA ("Agreements")
established the primary terms and conditions of an accounts receivable
securitization program (the "Receivables Facility").



Pursuant to the terms of the Sub-PSA, the Sub-Originators sold its receivables
to Covia in a true sale conveyance. Pursuant to the PSA, Covia, in its capacity
as originator, sold in a true sale conveyance its receivables, including the
receivables it purchased from the Sub-Originators, to Covia Financing. Under the
Receivables Facility, Covia Financing could borrow or obtain letters of credit
in an amount not to exceed $75 million in the aggregate and would secure its
obligations with a pledge of undivided interests in such receivables, together
with related security and interests in the proceeds thereof, to PNC. The loans
under the Receivables Facility were an obligation of Covia Financing and not the
Sub-Originators or Covia.  None of the Sub-Originators nor Covia guaranteed the
collectability of the trade receivables or the creditworthiness of the obligors
of the receivables.

Amounts outstanding under the Receivables Facility accrue interest based on
LIBOR Market Index Rate, provided that Covia Financing could select adjusted
LIBOR for a tranche period. The Receivables Facility was scheduled to terminate
on March 31, 2023, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the terms of the
Agreements. On July 1, 2020, as part of the Plan (as defined below) and with the
approval of the Bankruptcy Court (as defined below), the Company terminated the
Receivables Facility. The Agreements included customary fees, conditions,
representations and warranties, indemnification provisions, covenants and events
of default. The amount available with respect to the receivables was subject to
customary limits and reserves, including limits and reserves based on customer
concentrations and prior past due balances. Subject in some cases to cure
periods, amounts outstanding under the Receivables Facility could be accelerated
for typical defaults including, but not limited to, the failure to make when due
payments or deposits, borrowing base deficiencies, failure to observe or perform
any covenant, failure to pay a material judgment, inaccuracy of representations
and warranties, certain bankruptcy or ERISA events, a change of control, the
occurrence of a termination event if certain limits are exceeded for a specified
period, for certain defaults or acceleration under material debt, or invalidity
of security interests or unenforceable transaction documents.



There were no borrowings under the Receivables Facility at June 30, 2020.

The filing of the Chapter 11 Cases constituted an event of default under the Receivables Facility.





On July 1, 2020, as part of the Plan and with the approval of the Bankruptcy
Court, the Company terminated the Receivables Facility, including the
Receivables Financing Agreement (the "RFA") by and among (i) the Company, as
initial servicer, (ii) Covia Financing LLC, a special purpose entity and wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company, as borrower ("Covia Financing"), (iii) the
persons from time to time party thereto, as lenders, (iv) PNC Bank, National
Association, as LC bank and as administrative agent ("PNC"), and (v) PNC Capital
Markets LLC, as structuring agent ("PNC Capital"). In connection with the RFA,
(i) the Company, as originator and servicer, and Covia Financing, as the buyer,
had entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement ("PSA"), and (ii) various of the
Company's subsidiaries, as sub-originators ("Sub-Originators"), and the Company,
as the buyer and servicer, entered into the Sub-Originator Purchase and Sale
Agreement ("Sub-PSA"). Together, the RFA, the PSA, and the Sub-PSA established
the primary terms and conditions of an accounts receivable securitization
program (the "Receivables Facility").



In connection with the termination of the Receivables Facility, the Company
repaid all of the outstanding obligations in respect of principal, interest and
fees under the Receivables Facility and terminated and released all security
interests and liens in the assigned receivables granted in connection therewith.



Further, with the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, the Receivables Facility
was replaced with a letter of credit facility pursuant to an interim order of
the Bankruptcy Court authorizing, among other things, (i) the Company's funding
of a new letter of credit collateral account held at Covia Financing, (ii) entry
into the Payoff and Reassignment Agreement (the "Payoff Agreement"), among the
Company, Covia Financing, the Sub-Originators, PNC, and PNC Capital, (iii) the
Company's, Covia Financing's and the Sub-Originators' entry into, and
performance of, their respective obligations under the Payoff Agreement and, as
applicable, the Reimbursement Agreement for Cash-Collateralized Standby Letters
of Credit, among PNC, Covia Financing, and the Company (the "Reimbursement
Agreement" and, together with the Payoff Agreement, the "Letter of Credit
Agreements"), and (iv) execution of the transactions contemplated by the Letter
of Credit Agreements.


In July 2020, we cash collateralized approximately $37.0 million of our outstanding standby letters of credit.


                                       52

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Working Capital



Working capital is the amount by which current assets (excluding cash and cash
equivalents and assets held for sale) exceed current liabilities (excluding
current portion of long-term debt) and represents a measure of
liquidity. Covia's working capital was $235.2 million at June 30, 2020 and $61.7
million at December 31, 2019. The increase in working capital is primarily due
to the reclassification of substantially all of the pre-petition current
liabilities to Liabilities Subject to Compromise insofar as they relate to
obligations of the Company Parties. Our working capital requirements remain
consistent with the pre-petition requirements, however, these pre-petition
liabilities subject to compromise may be settled for amounts substantially
different from those in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Excluding this classification change, our working capital would have been $42.0
million. The change in pro forma working capital compared to December 31, 2019
was due to $34.6 million of our cash flow hedging instruments becoming currently
payable. The reclassification to current was made due to the event of default as
a result of the Chapter 11 Cases. During the quarter ended June 30, 2020,
various working capital metrics improved, particularly cash collections and days
sales outstanding ratios.



Cash Flow Analysis


Net Cash (Used) Provided in Operating Activities





Operating activities consist primarily of net income adjusted for non-cash
items, including depreciation, depletion, and amortization, the gain on the sale
of subsidiaries, impairment charges, non-cash losses on derivatives, non-cash
reorganization items and the effect of changes in working capital.



Net cash used in operating activities was $40.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2020, compared with $51.4 million of cash provided by operating
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2019. This $91.5 million variance
was primarily due to lower profitability in the current period. The lower
volumes in the six months ended June 30, 2020 resulted in lower working capital
requirements to fund accounts receivable and inventories. Improvements in
collections also resulted in additional reductions in receivables compared to
the six months ended June 30, 2019. Further, in the second quarter of 2019, the
Company implemented a new ERP system which resulted in longer average collection
times during the second quarter 2019 on the Company's trade receivables.



Net Cash Used in Investing Activities





Investing activities in the current period consist primarily of capital
expenditures for maintenance; however, the Company typically utilizes cash for
both growth and maintenance projects. Capital expenditures generally consist of
expansions of production or terminal facilities, land and reserve acquisition or
maintenance related expenditures for asset replacement and health, safety, and
quality improvements. As a result of current market conditions, the Company has
refocused its capital investment strategy primarily toward maintenance capital
and investments in projects to maintain health and safety standards.



Net cash used in investing activities was $16.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2020, compared to $62.6 million used for the six months ended June 30,
2019. The $46.1 million variance was primarily due to reduced growth-related
capital expenditures within the Energy segment to align with current market
conditions. Capital expenditures were $17.5 million in the six months ended June
30, 2020 and were primarily focused on maintenance expenditures at various
facilities as well as investments in the Company's nepheline syenite operations.
Capital expenditures were $59.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2019
and were primarily focused on completing our West Texas and Seiling facilities,
completion of expansion projects at our Illinois and Oregon facilities, and
expanding capacity at our Canoitas, Mexico facility.



Subject to our continuing evaluation of market conditions, we anticipate that
our capital expenditures in 2020 will be approximately $45 million, which will
be primarily associated with maintenance and cost improvement capital projects,
and near-term payback growth projects. We expect to fund our capital
expenditures through cash on our balance sheet and cash generated from our
operations.



                                       53

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities





Net cash used in financing activities was $9.9 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2020 compared to $11.0 million used in the six months ended June 30,
2019. The slight decrease is primarily due to decreased principal repayments of
our Term Loan in the six months ended June 30, 2020 versus the prior
period. This decrease was driven by the repurchase of approximately $63 million
of the outstanding Term Loan in December of 2019, which lowered the overall
amortization payment requirements.



Liquidity After Filing the Chapter 11 Cases





During the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company's principal sources of
liquidity are expected to be limited to cash flow from operations and cash on
hand. Our ability to maintain adequate liquidity through the reorganization
process and beyond depends on successful operation of our business, and
appropriate management of operating expenses and capital spending. Our
anticipated liquidity needs are highly sensitive to changes in each of these and
other factors.



The Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report have been prepared
on a going concern basis of accounting, which contemplates continuity of
operations, realization of assets, and satisfaction of liabilities and
commitments in the normal course of business. The Consolidated Financial
Statements do not reflect any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
the Chapter 11 Cases. We have reclassified all of the Company Parties
indebtedness to "Liabilities Subject to Compromise" at June 30, 2020. Our level
of indebtedness has adversely impacted and is continuing to adversely impact our
financial condition. As a result of our financial condition, the defaults under,
and the resulting acceleration of, substantially all of our outstanding
indebtedness, and the risks and uncertainties surrounding the Chapter 11 Cases,
substantial doubt exists that we will be able to continue as a going concern.
For further discussion, see Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial
statements and those risk factors discussed under "Risk Factors" in Part II,
Item 1A of this Report.



In anticipation of the Chapter 11 Cases, we did not make our quarterly principal
payment of $4.0 million on the Term Loan, which was due after the Petition Date.
In addition, following the Chapter 11 Cases, all interest payments due on debt
held by the Company Parties were stayed and are included in liabilities subject
to compromise on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June
30, 2020. Additionally, a significant portion of our accounts payable and
accrued expenses on the balance sheet of the Company Parties represent
pre-petition claims which may not be paid in full.



Sources of Capital


As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had the following debt outstanding, net of cash and cash equivalents:





                                          June 30, 2020       December 31, 2019
                                                      (in thousands)
Term Loan                                $             -     $          1,566,440
Finance lease liabilities                          1,503                    6,875
Industrial Revenue Bond                                -                   10,000
Other borrowings                                       -                      145
Term Loan deferred financing costs, net1               -                 

(25,754)


Liabilities subject to compromise2             1,572,073                    

-


Total Debt                                     1,573,576                

1,557,706


Less: Cash and cash equivalents                  250,261                  319,484
Net Debt                                 $     1,323,315     $          1,238,222



(1) As a result of the Company's Chapter 11 Cases, the Company expensed $24.3

million of Term Loan deferred financing costs, net, recorded in

Reorganization items, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Loss

for the three months ended June 30, 2020.

(2) In connection with our Chapter 11 Cases, the $1.6 billion outstanding under

the Term Loan, the $10.0 million outstanding under the Industrial Revenue

Bond, $3.5 million outstanding on finance leases and $0.1 million

outstanding on Other borrowings have been reclassified to Liabilities

subject to compromise in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of

June 30, 2020. As of the Petition Date, we continued to accrue interest


       expense in relation to Term Loan reclassified as Liabilities subject to
       compromise.


                                       54

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Seasonality



Our business is affected by seasonal fluctuations in weather that impact our
production levels and our customers' business needs. For example, our Energy
segment sales levels are lower in the first and fourth quarters due to lower
market demand as adverse weather tends to slow oil and gas operations to varying
degrees depending on the severity of the weather. In addition, our inability to
mine and process sand year-round at certain of our surface mines results in a
seasonal build-up of inventory as we mine sand to build a stockpile that will
feed our drying facilities during the winter months. Additionally, in the second
and third quarters, we sell higher volumes to our customers in our Industrial
segment's end markets due to the seasonal rise in demand driven by more
favorable weather conditions.



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements





We have no undisclosed off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are likely to
have a current or future material impact on our financial condition, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.





Contractual Obligations



Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this Report with respect to the filing of
the Chapter 11 Cases and the acceleration of substantially all of our debt
(including the Term Loan, the Industrial Revenue Bond and the Receivables
Facility) as a result, there have been no material changes outside of the
ordinary course of our business to the contractual arrangements disclosed in our
"Contractual Obligations" table in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of the Form 10-K.



Environmental Matters



We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations
governing, among other things, hazardous materials, air and water emissions,
environmental contamination and reclamation and the protection of the
environment and natural resources. We have made, and expect to make in the
future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot
predict the full amount of such future expenditures. We may also incur fines and
penalties from time to time associated with noncompliance with such laws and
regulations.



As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had $54.0 million and $46.5
million, respectively, accrued for Asset Retirement Obligations, which include
future reclamation costs. There were no significant changes with respect to
environmental liabilities or future reclamation costs, however, the timing of
the settlement estimate has been revised based on decisions made to idle certain
production facilities. This has resulted in an increase to the asset retirement
obligation recognized in the financial statements as it is computed on a
discounted cash flow model.



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates





Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the
date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. While we do not believe that the reported
amounts would be materially different, application of these policies involves
the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties
and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. We evaluate
our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on
experience and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under
the circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies, including certain
critical accounting policies and estimates, are disclosed in our Form 10-K.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 1 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Report.





                                       55

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© Edgar Online, source Glimpses