Sustainability & Foundation
Special Dialogue
Introduction | Purpose & | Messages to Our | Value Creation | Strategy & | Sustainability & | Governance | Data |
| Values | Stakeholders |
| Business | Foundation |
|
|
For True Sustainability Management
As the Dai-ichi Life Group strives to become a global top-tier company, what is needed to enhance corporate value from a sustainability perspective? This section features a special dialogue between Peter David Pedersen, an external expert who was involved in the formulation of our Core Materiality, and Hidehiko Sogano, our CSuO (Chief Sustainability Officer).
Roles of the CSuO and
the Sustainability Unit
Sogano: Sustainability is a broad concept, and as you mentioned the key lies in how we integrate sustainability into our business strategy. My role is to share this perspective with management and at the Board level. In management discussions, we tend to focus on financial indicators, but I feel that it is necessary to gather information on how the world is moving, what is required from us by the world, and to communicate and share that information within the Group.
The Group Sustainability Committee (Sustainability Committee) is a forum for open exchange of ideas among CxOs including CEO Mr. Kikuta, Group Heads of the holding company, presidents of major domestic Group companies, and executives from relevant departments along with external experts like yourself. To encourage candid discussions, we minimize briefings by the secretariat at committee meetings. We also widely open the meetings to the Group so that employees who are not the members of the Sustainability
Committee can become aware of it.
Pedersen: Let me share my thoughts from attending Sustainability Committee meetings. I believe that, first and foremost, it is crucial for the leaders of each business and corporate department to have a strong awareness of the strategic significance of promoting sustainability. In this regard, I’ve noticed significant progress over the past year or two. Many leaders have begun to speak about sustainability as a personal commitment.
Life insurance companies don’t operate factories that emit large amounts of greenhouse gases like, say, automakers. This can make it somewhat difficult to know what to do about sustainability. Therefore, we need to approach sustainability in a proactive and creative manner, exploring new angles to drive our initiatives forward. From that perspective, it is encouraging to see that many leaders are beginning to proactively think and speak about sustainability and take actions accordingly.
Formulation of Core Materiality
69
Sustainability & Foundation
Sustainability at the Dai-ichi Life Group
Sogano: When considering sustainability, what is important is the sustainability of the Dai-ichi Life Group itself. “If we keep the same insurance business as we do now, this company may be gone in 100 years.” With this healthy sense of crisis in mind, we are promoting transformation in many business divisions. Recent developments such as the participation of Benefit One in the Group and company-wide promotion of digital transformation (DX) are all linked to these perspectives for sustainability management.
In this context, the role of the Sustainability Unit is crucial. As a company, we cannot escape from pursuing profits based on short-term financial indicators. But at the same time, we need to enhance long-term corporate value, and to do so we must consider what is essential for people to live in a humane way. From this perspective, elements such as the environment, diversity, and human rights naturally come to the forefront, in my opinion.
Pedersen: The Dai-ichi Life Group is fundamentally a life insurance company. Life insurance is a product that involves long-term relationships with customers, so maintaining close connections with people is crucial.
Although I’m only in my second year of involvement with the Dai-ichi Life Group’s sustainability efforts, I believe that the Group is currently in a transitional phase where sustainability and business strategy are becoming truly integrated. In addition to considering how the Group can be a lifetime partner of its customers, I see that now we are already in an era where we need to think about protecting the environment, and what kind of services we can provide to vulnerable people.
Hidehiko Sogano:
Director, Managing Executive Officer, and CSuO (Chief Sustainability Officer) at Dai-ichi Life Holdings. After joining the Bank of Japan in 1983, he joined Dai-ichi Life Insurance in 2015. He has served as an Executive Officer at Dai-ichi Life Holdings since 2018, a Managing ExecutiveOfficer since 2021, and CSuO since April 2023. With extensive experience in financial institutions and deep knowledge of
the SDGs, he is leading the Group’s sustainability management efforts.
Peter David Pedersen:
Representative Director of NELIS Global, an NPO. With more than 20 years of experience in the environmental and sustainability fields, he has been involved in corporate consulting and the development of business leaders. He introduced the concept of “Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability (LOHAS)”
to Japan. Since 2023, Mr. Pedersen has served as an external expert on the Dai-ichi Life Group’s Sustainability Committee, providing advice on material issue selection and shaping the Group’s sustainability strategy with his experience and insights.
Sogano: In the process of developing our new mid-term management plan, announced in April 2024, we also formulated our list of Core Materiality. Mr. Pedersen, you actively participated in these discussions as well.
Pedersen: While the Group had previously established a set of materiality, this time we engaged in extensive discussions to identify Core Materiality that more closely reflects the Group’s strategies and intentions.
Mr. Kikuta has set a goal of becoming a “global top- tier insurance group” as the vision for FY2030. During our discussions on Core Materiality, therefore, we placed emphasis on ensuring that the expressions we use resonate globally. The Group’s four new Core Materiality are primarily presented in English, with Japanese explanations provided beneath them. This approach signifies the Dai-ichi Life Group’s genuine commitment to becoming a global top-tier insurance group.
Sogano: Our biggest challenge was distinguishing ourselves, because many other companies are also formulating their own Materiality. We needed to create something that not only stands up globally but also reflects the unique character of the Group, conveying a sense of human connection.
The first Core Materiality, “Financial Well-being for All,” signifies our commitment to supporting everyone’s happiness, starting with providing financial support. Traditionally, we have provided this “Financial Well-being”through conventional life insurance products. Moving forward, we aim to deliver this through a broader range of services, including those outside insurance services. As people’s lifestyles and values become more diverse, our commitment to expanding our services reflects our desire to financially support the lives of all people. This intention is encapsulated in the words “for All.”
70
Sustainability & Foundation
CSuO
Hidehiko Sogano
External expert of the Group Sustainability Committee
Peter David Pedersen
Dai-ichi Life Holdings Integrated Report 2024
Sustainability & Foundation |
| Special Dialogue For True Sustainability Management |
|
Introduction | Purpose & | Messages to Our | Value Creation | Strategy & | Sustainability & | Governance | Data |
| Values | Stakeholders |
| Business | Foundation |
|
|
71
Sustainability & Foundation
The second one, “Healthy People and Society,” emphasizes that true happiness requires both physical and mental well-being. Here, it is essential to not only pursue individual happiness but also contribute positively to the society in which each person is a part. Accordingly, we established the Core Materiality that also includes the perspective of connecting individuals and society.
As our business activities expand, environmental issues that impact the entire planet become increasingly important. The key here is “Environmental Leadership,” our third Core Materiality. We must go beyond simple environmental awareness. Given the Group’s scale, we must provide leadership to other financial institutions and be at the forefront in engaging with investees on addressing environmental issues. That’s why we included the word “Leadership.”
The fourth Core Materiality, “Proactive Governance and Engagement,” is an essential foundation for achieving the other three issues. It emphasizes the need to build a solid base for sustainable management through strong corporate governance, group governance, and HR strategies. Building connections with all stakeholders is also another important element within this issue.
Pedersen: In our discussions on Core Materiality, I focused on proposing language that would capture the unique character of the Dai-ichi Life Group and leave a strong and lasting impression.
As time goes on, the Group will likely see a turnover of people. I hope that new members will understand the intent behind the Core Materiality and view them as crucial guiding principles for leading the Group forward. Once everyone genuinely embraces its Core Materiality and regards them as “cool,” it will inspire leaders to put them into practice.
Sogano: Whether the content resonates with what Mr. Kikuta wants to convey is crucial to the success of our sustainability initiatives, so we were conscious of including this perspective. What is important is how we act voluntarily, not the “feeling of being forced to do something” under regulations.
Environmental initiatives:
TNFD and GFANZ
Sogano: As you mentioned, as a significant portion of the Dai-ichi Life Group’s business is life insurance, the impact of
our sustainability initiatives might not be directly apparent, making them difficult to understand. On the environment, for example, our own GHG emissions account for only 3% of the Group’s total emissions. The remaining 97% comes from the GHG emitted by companies in which we invest using insurance premiums we receive from our customers.
Therefore, we need to collaborate with each of our investees, engaging in dialogue to consider ways to reduce emissions. In this process, we also seek insights from external experts like you, ensuring that we stay informed on current trends while developing our plans.
In addition, in FY2024, the Group registered as an Early Adopter*1 of the recommendations by the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD). Under the TNFD, location plays a crucial role, requiring us to investigate the specific characteristics of each business location and analyze the impacts on ecosystems, water quality, air quality, and other environmental factors. When considering the environment, we cannot ignore ecosystems, so we must address the recommendations of the TNFD and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) together under a comprehensive approach.
However, how to deal with the TNFD recommendations has not yet been firmly established, globally. For this reason, we aim to take the lead by starting early and setting examples for other companies to follow. This is also the rationale for our registration as an Early Adopter.
Pedersen: Over the past three to four years, the actions we need to take on the environment have become much clearer. The three concepts of net zero (NZ)*2, circular economy (CE)*3, and nature positive (NP)*4 are all essential elements in building a sustainable society.
The NZ concept, which involves improving energy efficiency and investing in renewable energy, is relatively easy to understand and quantify. On the other hand, CE and NP are more complex and challenging issues, but addressing them is crucial for the survival of humanity on this planet.
In particular, the TNFD recommendations, which focus on achieving NP, present challenges to implement, but no matter how much NZ is achieved, it is meaningless if nature has been destroyed. While we have a fiduciary responsibility in terms of financial investments, we now also bear a responsibility related to sustainability. How the Dai-ichi Life Group engages in investing and lending within the framework of NZ, CE, and NP will play a key role in shaping the future standard.
Sogano: In terms of shaping the standard, the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) is also an important initiative. GFANZ, an initiative that began at COP26 (the 26th UN Climate Change conference ) in Glasgow, has its Asia- Pacific regional headquarters in Singapore. In June 2023,
it established the world’s first national chapter, the Japan Chapter. A total of 24 Japanese companies are participating in this chapter, including Dai-ichi Life, megabanks, regional banks, asset management firms, and life and non-life insurance companies. In addition, the GFANZ Japan Chapter provides a platform for discussion among stakeholders such as financial institutions including regional banks and public-sector lending institutions, government agencies (the Financial Services Agency, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Ministry of the Environment) to build mutual understanding of the current perspectives of financial institutions. Japan does not have a well-established system for private-sector advocacy toward the government, so such platforms are particularly
important. Participation in the Japan Chapter enables public and private institutions to come together and engage in unified discussions, which I believe is important.
Pedersen: GFANZ has commitments from financial institutions worldwide, with Japan playing a central role. For the Dai-
ichi Life Group, which aims to be a global top-tier insurance group, it is crucial to demonstrate leadership and enhance its presence within this organization.
Publication of the Human Rights Report
Sogano: We were talking earlier about the importance of people. During our recent review of the Group Principles, we also reassessed our Values (values that we uphold) and placed “We care (for our customers, business partners, employees, and the communities and environment in which we operate)” at the top of our priorities. Human rights are a fundamental consideration when it comes to people, impacting not only our employees but also our customers, business partners, and the entire supply chain. In Japan, human rights due diligence is still in its early stages. To promote proper due diligence and increase awareness of its significance, we published the “Dai- ichi Life Group Human Rights Report 2024.”
Pedersen: At the core of this initiative is the belief that respect and care are essential when interacting with various stakeholders throughout the value chain, from upstream suppliers to customers, including socially vulnerable groups in the countries where the Group operates. In the journey to achieve it, human rights are just the first step, not the ultimate goal. Having said so, a strong foundation of human rights recognition is still crucial for effective sustainability management, making your commitment to human rights vital. I’m encouraged by the progress you are making, including the publication of the Human Rights Report.
From a pragmatic perspective, publishing an advanced report like the Human Rights Report also benefits you by positively influencing assessments from shareholders and external evaluation agencies. Sustainability management requires both idealism and realism. Focusing solely on idealism can lead to inefficiency, while adhering only to realism can cause people to derail from their guiding light. Therefore, it is important to drive activities with realism while pursuing our ideal goals.
Challenges in promoting sustainability at the Dai-ichi Life Group
Sogano: I believe there are three main challenges. First is the issue of communication. Those in sales are likely aware of sustainability through their daily interactions with customers, and top management’s awareness of sustainability is also high. However, awareness among our middle-level management seems to be lacking.
Second, all sustainability initiatives need to be disclosed in accordance with global standards. As the Dai- ichi Life Group strives to become a global top-tier insurance company, it is essential for all Group companies to act with a unified perspective. To accomplish this, we need to enhance communication with both domestic and international subsidiaries, ensuring that all parties are aligned.
The third challenge is how to measure and communicate the progress of non-financial value, such as human value and
environmental value. Human value means values created by people, who are not just a component of capital but are themselves the core of a company. By enhancing people’s creativity and embracing an output-oriented mindset, the human value increases overall productivity and corporate value. Sustainability-related initiatives are challenging to quantify, making it difficult to communicate them in an easy-to- understand manner. To address this issue, we plan to cooperate with external research institutions and seek solutions within a two- to three-year time frame. Once this challenge is resolved, the other two challenges will become easier to communicate, leading to a better overall understanding. It also relates to how we address Core Materiality through our business activities and how we link that to corporate value. I am sure that non-financial initiatives are linked to finance, but how can we explain that to the capital markets and others in an easy-to-understand way? Actually, that is my biggest concern right now.
Pedersen: It might take until FY2026, the final year of your new mid-term management plan, to fully integrate the financial and non-financial aspects. Once you have achieved this, the Dai-ichi Life Group’s business will become much more exciting as the Group heads toward FY2030.
I agree with Mr. Kikuta’s views on human capital. While financial performance is a matter of course in a sense, a company should also be able to invigorate both its employees and customers.
I don’t really like the idea of financial and non-financial dichotomy. What matters most, in my view, is working toward a larger goal that unifies the two. I believe the Group’s
goal should be to become a company with a higher overall value by integrating financial value, human value, and, of course, environmental value, thereby earning the support of stakeholders.
Sogano: I look forward to your continued support for the Dai- ichi Life Group as we pursue our vision.
*1 Early adopters of disclosure recommendations published by the TNFD in September 2023
*2 Achieving net zero by subtracting the amount of GHG captured/absorbed from the amount emitted
*3 An economy that maximizes added value through the efficient and circular use of resources at all stages (circular economy)
*4 Preventing and reversing the loss of biodiversity and putting nature back on a path to recovery
72
Sustainability & Foundation
Dai-ichi Life Holdings Integrated Report 2024
Sustainability & Foundation
Group Sustainability Promotion Structure
Sustainability promotion structure
Introduction | Purpose & | Messages to Our | Value Creation | Strategy & | Sustainability & | Governance | Data |
| Values | Stakeholders |
| Business | Foundation |
|
|
|
| Financial Well-being for All | Environmental Leadership |
|
|
|
|
|
| Healthy People and Society | Proactive Governance and Engagement |
|
|
|
|
Sustainability management promotion cycle |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
|
| |
the Group promotes effective sustainability management through | based on the ISSB/SSBJ standards, while strengthening efforts for | ||
the following PDCA cycle. | stakeholder communication, such as visits by the CSuO to Group | ||
In FY2024, we aim to develop IT infrastructure for data | companies and offices, and establishment of communication lines | ||
acquisition in anticipation of information disclosure requirements | with Group companies. |
|
|
The Group is building a sustainability promotion structure centered on | In FY2024, the Sustainability Unit was established to further |
the Group Sustainability Committee to make meaningful contributions | accelerate Group-based sustainability initiatives that integrate |
to the realization of a sustainable society. | environmental, social, and governance issues based on international |
In April 2023, the new position of Chief Sustainability Officer | standards. |
(CSuO) was created for an individual tasked with promoting the Group |
|
sustainability strategy and chairing the Group Sustainability Committee. |
|
● Formulate and review the Group Principles |
|
|
● Understand interrelationships between the Group | 1 | 2 |
Principles, management strategies, and the | ||
sustainability policy |
|
|
● Formulate and review Core |
Materiality |
● Understand interrelationships |
between the sustainability policy and |
each business strategy |
● Establish indicators to measure |
initiatives related to Core Materiality |
73
Supervision
Execution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Board of Directors | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Executive Management Board | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reports |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Group Sustainability Committee |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Committee | Chief Sustainability Officer(CSuO) |
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| Chair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Collaborates | |
|
|
| • Each Chief Officer (CxO) |
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| • Each Group Head |
|
|
| |||||||||
Members | • Presidents or CEOs of domestic Group companies |
|
|
| |||||||||||
(Dai-ichi Life, Dai-ichi Frontier Life, Neo First Life, ipet Insurance) |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| • Dai-ichi Life’s Officers in charge of Corporate Planning |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| and Responsible Investment |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| Note: External experts and such are invited in accordance with the theme |
|
|
| |||||||||
| Sustainability Unit |
|
|
| |||||||||||
Secretariat |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various committees
- Group ERM Committee
- Group Compliance Committee
- Group Human Rights Awareness Promotion Committee, etc.
- Establish communication lines with major overseas Group companies
- Visits by the CSuO to Group companies and offices, etc.
- Implement measures to raise employees’ awareness and promote instillment
- Hold sustainability-focused IR information meetings and engage with stakeholders on human rights
Establishment and | Formulation of plans |
instillment of | |
| |
corporate philosophy |
|
Stakeholder | Execution, |
performance analysis, | |
communication | |
and disclosures | |
4 | 3 |
● Implement instillment measures and |
| ||
| supplement resources |
|
|
● Strengthen information disclosures |
| ||
| in light of regulations (ISSB/SSBJ) |
|
|
● Disclose information compatible |
|
| |
| with a review of external ESG |
|
|
| assessments |
|
|
● Utilize sustainability information in |
|
| |
| management strategies |
|
|
● |
| 2 |
|
| Develop an IT infrastructure for CO |
| |
| emission measurements |
| 74 |
Fostering awareness among officers and employees |
Sustainability & Foundation
| Domestic Group companies | Collaborates |
| Global meetings |
Dai-ichi Life | ● Employee Well-being Improvement |
| ◆ Global Leaders Committee (GLC) | |
|
| |||
Committee |
|
|
|
- Responsible Investment Committee, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overseas Group |
Dai-ichi Frontier Life | Neo First Life | ipet Insurance |
|
| Collaborates |
|
| |
etc. |
|
|
| companies | ||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Sustainability Committee
The Group Sustainability Committee discusses the Group’s policies | perspective throughout the Group. These discussions all consider | ||||
and strategies, effective publication of information including | the opinions of external experts. The Committee then reports its | ||||
external commitments, and monitoring of the implementation of | discussions to the Executive Management Board and the Board of | ||||
initiatives at each Group company, from a medium- to long-term | Directors. | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Group has rolled out a range of initiatives to foster awareness | understanding of the overall picture of sustainability and the status | Sustainability |
of sustainability management Group-wide. In FY2024, we | of the Group’s efforts.” We will continue efforts to further improve | |
& | ||
established the Sustainability Unit under a new structure and are | operation of the committee going forward. Apart from that | |
Foundation | ||
expanding staff to promote and instill awareness of sustainability | initiative, more than 1,300 executives and employees from 11 | |
initiatives throughout the Group. As a new initiative, the Group | Group companies participated in the ECO Action Relay, a Group- | |
Sustainability Committee meetings are open to all Group staff | wide environmental event held in FY2023. | |
members, and ca. 140 Group employees participated in the first |
|
|
FY2024 meeting. We received feedback from the participating |
|
|
employees. One of the comments was “I gained a deeper |
|
|
Sustainability information disclosure
■Recent topics of discussion
Month | Overview |
May | ● Positionings of sustainability initiatives and business activities |
2023 | ● Transition finance initiatives at Dai-ichi Life |
September | ● Revising our materiality |
● Our challenges and direction of action in response to the ISSB standards | |
2023 | |
and external ESG assessments | |
| |
December | ● Sustainability policy for the next mid-term management plan |
2023 | |
| |
March | ● Promotion of sustainability management during the next mid-term |
management plan | |
2024 | |
● Progress of human rights initiatives | |
| |
May | ● Sustainability initiatives at major overseas Group companies |
● Direction for enhancing human capital disclosures | |
2024 | |
● Future initiatives based on the value creation story | |
|
■Main external experts*
Yoshiki | Representative Director of the Well- |
Ishikawa | being for Planet Earth Foundation |
Peter David | Representative Director of NELIS |
Pedersen |
|
Yukari | Professor, The University of Tokyo |
Takamura | Institute for Future Initiatives |
*Participants are invited as appropriate based on the theme of each session.
Dai-ichi Life Holdings prepares its Sustainability Report to provide | addition, we are working to expand the information on our website, |
all stakeholders with a deep understanding of the Group’s | not only updating it on a yearly basis but also releasing the latest |
approach to sustainability and the major initiatives it is pursuing. In | information as needed. |
https://www.dai-ichi-life- hd.com/en/sustainability/report/index.html
Dai-ichi Life Holdings Integrated Report 2024
Sustainability & Foundation
Climate Change and Natural Capital Initiatives
Introduction | Purpose & | Messages to Our | Value Creation | Strategy & | Sustainability & | Governance | Data |
| Values | Stakeholders |
| Business | Foundation |
|
|
Environmental Leadership
- Risk management
Risk management system
-Disclosures Based on the TCFD and TNFD Recommendations-
- Introduction and background
The Group is implementing risk management that takes appropriate measures at an early stage by specifying foreseeable risks with the potential to significantly impact its business as “material risks” and formulating business plans that take these risks into account*5.
issues, particularly climate change, are a challenge to be tackled by the international community as a whole, and the Group recognizes that addressing climate change is an important management issue that could have a significant impact on customers’ lives and health, corporate activities, and social sustainability. In response to this,
It is estimated that more than half of the world’s GDP is derived from nature and ecosystems, and natural capital is an important foundation for the Group’s business activities. The two are also said to be closely related, as heavy rains, floods, and droughts caused by climate change can lead to the degradation of natural capital.
Based on this recognition, the Group, as a member of society, considers that the conservation of the local environment, climate change countermeasures, global environmental protection, the
ensure the sustainability of the global environment, which is the foundation of people’s lives. Under this Core Materiality, the Group, as an operational company and as an institutional investor, is committed to strategic responses to environmental challenges, particularly climate change and natural capital, with the goal of contributing to the realization of a decarbonized society. We will also actively communicate our views and become more involved in and contribute to global rulemaking through active participation in domestic and
We rate the impact*6 of the risks and the possibility of their occurrence on a scale of one to four based on the results from identifying material risks affecting Group companies. Using a heat map, the Risk Management Unit specifies material risks and reviews them every fiscal year. With the Paris Agreement taking effect in 2016, there is a growing recognition that environmental
since fiscal 2019 we have selected climate change–related risks as one of our material risks and have been strengthening our risk management. Specifically, the Group ERM Committee, chaired
by the Chief Risk Officer, discusses how to assess and respond to physical and transition risks, and reports to the Executive Management Board and the Board of Directors as necessary.
75
Sustainability
preservation of natural capital and biodiversity, and the creation of a recycling-oriented society are among its corporate social responsibilities. The Group will always act in consideration of its impact on the environment, in compliance with the Group’s “Vision and Group Action Principles for Environmental Initiatives*1,” and in keeping with the “Basic Policy on Responsible Investment*1 ” of our domestic core subsidiary, Dai-ichi Life.
In the new mid-term management plan, we have defined
“Core Materiality” as important issues that we must prioritize in order to realize our Group’s vision for FY2030. We have also defined “Environmental Leadership” as an issue that we must address to
international initiatives such as GFANZ*2, the world’s largest coalition of financial institutions with a net-zero commitment.
To realize the aspirations*3 embedded in the Group Purpose, we will demonstrate leadership both as an institutional investor and a operational company to an even greater degree. This includes enhancing measures that could become examples to others, such as improving sustainability disclosures. Through these efforts, building public trust, and creating customers’ empathy, we aim to help form a sustainable society and ultimately accelerate the sustainable growth of our business.
Governance/Risk management framework for addressing climate change and natural capital (as of April 2024)
Dai-ichi Life Holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Supervision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Board of Directors | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Executive Management Board | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reporting | to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reports as part of material risk management | |||
| Execution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Group Sustainability Committee (held four times/year) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Group ERM Committee (held five times/year) | ||||||||||
| ● Develops and discusses policies and strategies for addressing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ● Formulates risk management policy and checks compliance status | ||||||||||||
|
| climate change and natural capital, and monitors the progress of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ● Reviews measures to strengthen the risk management system | |||||||||||
|
|
| implementation of initiatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| Collaborates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Chair: Chief Sustainability Officer (CSuO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chair: Chief Risk Officer (CRO) |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| Secretariat: Sustainability Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Secretariat: Risk Management Unit, etc. |
76
Sustainability
& Foundation
- Governance
Roles of the Executive Management Board and the Board of Directors
Under the supervision of the Board of Directors and in accordance with | Group goals, direction of initiatives, risk responses) is regularly |
its business plan on climate change led by the Executive Management | reported to the Executive Management Board and the Board of |
Board, the Group is promoting initiatives related to climate change and | Directors. By ensuring oversight from the Board of Directors, we have a |
natural capital through the Group Sustainability Committee, the Group | framework that further strengthens efforts to address climate change |
ERM Committee, and other committees. The status of initiatives (e.g., | and natural capital issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaborates (e.g., information sharing, monitoring) |
|
| Collaborates (e.g., information sharing, monitoring) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Group Companies | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Strategy/Metrics and targets
- Climate Change Initiatives -
Net Zero Transition Plan
& Foundation
Initiatives to strengthen our governance structure
As a financial institution, we produced and disclosed our Net Zero Transition Plan in August 2023 to promote a more integrated
Dai-ichi Life and Dai-ichi Frontier Life to reduce Scope 3 (investments) emissions by 50% by 2030 (compared with 2020
As one of the measures to strengthen the Group’s governance structure, the Group Sustainability Committee was established in April 2021, and since April 2023 the Committee has been chaired by the Chief Sustainability Officer. Under this structure, the Committee is responsible for developing sustainability-related policies and strategies, including measures to address climate change and natural capital, and monitoring the implementation of these measures. In addition, starting in July 2022, sustainability
*1 For details of the policy, please refer to the respective pages on our website, as listed below.
Vision and Group Action Principles for Environmental Initiatives https://www.dai-ichi-life-hd.com/en/sustainability/environment/initiative.html Basic Policy on Responsible Investment https://www.dai-ichi-life-hd.com/en/sustainability/esg/investment_policy.html
*2 Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero. Please refer to P.83 for details of this initiative and the Group’s initiatives.
indicators*4, including an indicator related to progress in reducing CO2 emissions, have been included as part of performance-based stock remuneration for the Company’s executives. In April 2024, we reorganized the Sustainability Office into the Sustainability Unit. We beefed up the workforce by coordinating the sustainability policies and activities of the entire Group, thereby reinforcing our contributions to a decarbonized society and nature-positive activities.
*3 The Group Purpose: “Partnering with you to build a brighter and more secure future.”
*4 Please see P.105 for details on the remuneration system for directors and executive officers.
*5 Please refer to the following webpage for details on risk management: https://www.dai-ichi-life-hd.com/en/about/control/in_control/administer.html
*6 Degree of impact is assessed based on economic loss, reputational damage (impact on sales, management responsibility, and stock price), and other factors.
response to climate change issues aimed at transitioning to net zero in the real economy. This plan was formulated in reference to the transition plan guidance of GFANZ, etc.
The current transition plan is formulated mainly focusing on the activities of Dai-ichi Life, the Group’s core subsidiary in Japan. It is overseen by the CSuO and administered by the Sustainability Unit, with relevant departments of Dai-ichi Life in charge of promoting their respective initiatives. Its implementation progress is monitored and discussed by the Group Sustainability Committee, which reports its findings to the Executive Management Board and is supervised by the Board of Directors.
In March 2024, we set new interim reduction targets for GHG emissions, aiming to reduce Scope 1 & 2 emissions by 75% by FY2030 (compared with FY2019 levels), and a common target for
levels). As of the recent time period, Scope 1 & 2 emissions have been reduced by 62% (compared with FY2019), and Scope 3 (investments) emissions have been reduced by 31% (compared with 2020, on an absolute emissions basis) and 34% (compared with 2020 on an intensity basis) at Dai-ichi Life and Dai-ichi Frontier Life, respectively, demonstrating steady progress toward our goals. Please refer to “Initiatives as an Institutional Investor” on page 79 to learn more about our performance and targets for investments contributing to environmental and climate change solutions.
Full text of the Net Zero Transition Plan
https://www.dai-ichi-life-hd.com/en/sustainability/ environment/nztransitionplan.html
Dai-ichi Life Holdings Integrated Report 2024
Sustainability & Foundation
Introduction | Purpose & | Messages to Our | Value Creation | Strategy & | Sustainability & | Governance | Data |
| Values | Stakeholders |
| Business | Foundation |
|
|
77
Sustainability &
Road map to net zero
FY2020 | ~ | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
| 2030 | 2040 | 2050 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Initiatives as an operational company |
|
|
|
| Road map toward FY2030 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Reduction of Scope 1 & 2 emissions*7 |
|
| ● 50% reduction |
| ● 75% reduction | Net |
| |||||
| Achievement of 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| (entire Group)*9 |
| (entire Group)*9 | zero |
| |||
| renewable energy (RE) (Dai-ichi Life) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Reduction of Scope 3 emissions (other than Category 15)*7 |
|
|
| ● 30% reduction (Dai-ichi Life)*9 | Net | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| zero |
targets | Initiatives as an institutional investor (Unless otherwise noted, the following targets are for both Dai-ichi Life and Dai-ichi Frontier Life) |
|
| ||||||||||
Reduction of Scope 3 emissions*7 |
|
|
| ● 25% reduction (Dai-ichi Life)*10 | ● 50% reduction*12 |
| Net | ||||||
zero-Net | (Category 15, financed emissions*8) |
|
| ● 15% reduction (Dai-ichi Frontier Life)*11 |
|
|
| zero | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Environmental & climate solution investments |
|
| ● |
|
| |||||||
|
|
| 2.4mn tons CO2ep.a. | Cumulative total ¥2.5tn |
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Engagement with investees |
| Continued engagement with the top 50 emitters in the investment portfolios |
|
|
Fostering awareness among Group employees
Participating in and promoting international initiatives
Appointed as a GFANZ Principals Group member
Joined NZAOA*13
Establishment of CSuO
Strengthening our governance and execution
Established the Group Sustainability Committee
Set sustainability indicators as KPIs for executive remuneration
Climate-related risks and opportunities
Scenario analysis
Climate change risks are expected to have a wide range
of spillover pathways and could materialize over various time frames. Based on the TCFD recommendations, the Group recognizes climate change risks by classifying them into physical risks*16 and transition risks*17 and sorting them out by risk category. The Group assumes the examples shown in the table on the right as climate change risks that could materialize over a time frame of about three years in the short term and more than 10 years in the long term, and conducts scenario analyses for underwriting risks and market/credit risks.
As part of our efforts to understand risks related to claims and benefit payments, we have been analyzing the relationship between temperature and Dai-ichi Life’s claims and benefits since FY2020, in cooperation with Mizuho–DL Financial Technology Co., Ltd. Please refer to the Sustainability Report published in the autumn of 2024 for details.
In addition, we use MSCI’s CVaR methodology for analyzing those market and credit risks that constitute physical and transition risks for invested assets. The aggregated CVaR was (13.8%) for the NDCs scenario*18 with the highest physical risk and (18.8%) for the Net Zero 2050 scenario with the highest transition risk. In comparison to the benchmark, superior results were shown in the Net Zero 2050 scenario in terms of both transition and physical risks. In addition, the implied temperature rise (ITR)*19 of the Group’s portfolio was 2.3°C.
| Environmental Leadership | |
|
|
|
Risk categories | Examples of major physical and transition risks | |
|
|
|
Underwriting | [Physical risk] Risk of an increase in insurance claims and benefits | |
risk | paid due to an increase in mortality, etc., caused by the spread of heat | |
stroke and infectious diseases resulting from rising temperatures |
| |
| ||
| [Physical risk] Risk of deterioration in the financial condition of | |
| a credit recipient due to damage to business facilities caused | |
Market/credit | by extreme weather or disruption of supply chains in the | |
risk | manufacturing industry | |
[Transition risk] Risk that the prices of assets held will decline | ||
| ||
| as businesses are affected by decarbonization and as society | |
| increasingly chooses to invest in decarbonization |
[Physical risk] Risk of increased insurance payouts due to extreme Liquidity risk weather conditions and risk of inability to conduct sufficient market transactions due to market disruptions caused by natural disasters
| [Physical risk] Risk of damage to data centers, business offices, |
Operational | and other locations necessary for operations due to extreme |
weather conditions, resulting in the suspension of operations | |
risk | |
[Transition risk] Risk of financial losses due to fines, lawsuits, etc., | |
| |
| stemming from inadequate measures to address climate change |
|
|
| [Transition risk] Risk that our business will be negatively impacted |
Reputational | by being evaluated as inappropriate by stakeholders (due to our |
inadequate climate change initiatives), continued relationships with | |
risk | |
business partners that are insufficiently environmentally conscious, | |
| |
| or other factors. |
|
|
CVaR (impact/amount of subject assets)
|
|
|
| Portfolio |
|
|
| Benchmark |
| ← 1.5°C scenario → | ← 2°C scenario → |
| ← 3°C scenario → |
| ← 1.5°C scenario → | ||
+5% | Net Zero 2050 | Delayed transition | NDCs | Fragmented World | Net Zero 2050 | |||
+0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15%) | Transition |
| (14.6%) | (13.8%) | (14.2%) |
| ||
(20%) |
|
| ||||||
risk | (18.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(25%) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (24.0%) | |
(30%) |
| ■ Policy risk | ■ Opportunities | ■ Physical risk | ■ Total | |||
|
|
Subject assets are Dai-ichi Life’s equities and corporate bonds and Dai-ichi Frontier Life’s corporate bonds, totaling approximately ¥10 trillion. Benchmarks are NOMURA-BPI corporate bonds (for domestic corporate bonds), Barclays Global Corporate Bond Index (for foreign corporate bonds), TOPIX (for domestic equities), and MSCI ACWI (for foreign equities). Data: As of March 31, 2024 Source: Reproduced by permission of MSCI ESG Research LLC
Physical risk is measured using the RCP 8.5 scenario and transition risk using the NGFS scenario.
78
Sustainability &
Foundation
The Group recognizes that climate change might bring several impacts (shown below) over the medium to long term. Based on the results of analyses using the SSP scenario*14 (5–8.5), the NGFS scenarios*15, and other scenarios, the Group, as an operational company and an institutional investor, will strive to enhance resilience to climate change and seize related opportunities.
For details, see our Sustainability Report published in the autumn of 2024
https://www.dai-ichi-life-hd.com/en/sustainability/report/ index.html
Initiatives as an operational company
Foundation
| ● Increase in insurance claims and benefits paid due to increase in heatstroke and infectious diseases and in flood damage caused by typhoons |
| associated with global warming |
Risks | ● Decrease in the value of investments due to an inadequate response to environmental changes such as the introduction of carbon taxes, damage |
| to assets caused by changes in the market and social environment, development of new technologies, and changes in consumer behavior |
| ● Reputational damage and litigation due to delays in addressing climate change |
|
|
| ● Provision of products and services that contribute to reducing GHG emissions |
Opportunities | ● Increase in investment opportunities, including in the renewable energy business, that contribute to resolving climate change issues |
● Greater resilience of the investment portfolio resulting from proper assessment of investees’ climate risks and opportunities | |
| |
| ● Reduced operating costs through the introduction of infrastructure with high resource efficiency |
|
|
The Group’s Scope 1 & 2 emissions were ca. 42,700 tons in FY2023 (a reduction of ca. 62% from FY2019), achieving the Group’s medium-term reduction target (50% reduction in FY2025) ahead of schedule.
Since becoming the first Japanese life insurance company to join the RE100*20 in 2019, Dai-ichi Life has been reviewing its electricity supply and demand contracts, providing off-site corporate PPA services*21, and utilizing environmental values such as J-Credits and non-fossil certificates. The Climate Group, the operator of RE100, announced in its RE100 Annual Disclosure
Report 2023 that Dai-ichi Life had achieved 100% of its RE100 targets for FY2022, making it an official RE100 achiever. We are also pushing for the introduction of renewable energy at other Group companies in Japan and overseas. In addition, Dai-ichi Life’s Scope 3 (other than Category 15) emissions reached a level of ca. 44,300 tons in FY2023 (a reduction of ca. 11% from FY2019) through the phased reduction of office paper consumption and other measures.
We will continue making Group-wide efforts to achieve net-zero emissions.
*7 Scope 1: Direct emissions by the Group; Scope 2: Indirect emissions from the generation of purchased or acquired electricity, etc., consumed by the Group; Scope 3: Indirect emissions other than Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Dai-ichi Life’s Scope 3 (excluding Category 15) emissions include Category 1 (Purchased goods and services), Category 3 (Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 and 2)), Category 4 (Upstream transportation and distribution), Category 5 (Waste generated in operations), Category 6 (Business travel), Category 7 (Employee commuting), and Category 12 (End-of-life treatment of sold products).
*8 GHG emissions of investees (Scope 3, Category 15)
*9 Compared with FY2019
*10 Compared with 2020 (listed equities, corporate bonds, and real estate portfolios)
*11 Compared with FY2020, based on GHG emissions per unit of assets held (intensity)
*12 Compared with 2020. On an intensity basis for Dai-ichi Frontier Life (listed equities, corporate bonds, real estate portfolio, and corporate loans).
*13 The UN-convenedNet-Zero Asset Owner Alliance (association of institutional investors committed to transitioning their portfolios to net zero by 2050)
*14 Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: Climate change scenarios set by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
*15 Climate change scenarios set by the Network for Greening the Financial System (network of financial authorities on climate risks, etc.)
*16 Risk of direct damage to real estate and other assets due to long-term climate change such as rising temperatures and sea level rise, and natural disasters such as typhoons
*17 Risks arising from new government policies, technological innovation, market changes, etc., in the process of transitioning to a low-carbon economy
*18 Nationally Determined Contributions
*19 Implied Temperature Rise. Indicators to analyze whether investees have set GHG emission reduction targets consistent with the goal of limiting global warming to 2°C by 2100.
*20 International initiative aiming to procure 100% of electricity consumed in business activities from renewable energy sources
*21 Method of procuring electricity utilizing a scheme in which a solar power generation facility dedicated to Dai-ichi Life is installed on land remote from where the demand is located, and the electricity thus generated is sent to the demand location along with its environmental value.
Dai-ichi Life Holdings Integrated Report 2024
Sustainability & Foundation
Initiatives as an institutional investor
Introduction | Purpose & | Messages to Our | Value Creation | Strategy & | Sustainability & | Governance | Data |
| Values | Stakeholders |
| Business | Foundation |
|
|
Environmental Leadership
Investments addressing social issues including environment and climate change
Dai-ichi Life, the Group’s core domestic subsidiary, has positioned the resolution of climate change issues as the most important issue for responsible investment. Dai-ichi Life has made more progress than initially expected on the targets set out in its “Medium-Term Policy for Responsible Investment (through FY2024)” set in April 2022.
In March 2024, Dai-ichi Life and Dai-ichi Frontier Life jointly adopted the “Medium-Term Policy for Responsible Investment (through FY2029)” to promote responsible investment across the Group.
To achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, the two companies set interim reduction targets for their investment portfolios up to
2030, and jointly promote initiatives focused on increasing positive impacts through the promotion of investments, and promoting the formulation and implementation of decarbonization strategies for investees through ongoing engagement. By undertaking these initiatives while leveraging the knowledge and expertise of both companies toward decarbonization, we will make greater contributions to the realization of a decarbonized society.
Medium-Term Policy for Responsible Investment (through FY2029)
https://www.dai-ichi-life.co.jp/english/dsr/investment/pdf/ri-report_005.pdf
Dai-ichi Life and Dai-ichi Frontier Life are expanding their investments (sustainability thematic investments) aimed at addressing social issues, including climate change. The cumulative amount of these investments reached ca. ¥2.5tn as of FY2023, and we intend to increase this amount to more than ¥5tn by FY2029, in order to further create a positive impact on society.
In particular, to strengthen our response to climate change, which is the most important theme of our responsible investment, we have set a target of increasing our investments that contribute to solving environmental and climate change issues (environmental and climate solution investments) to more than ¥2.5tn by FY2029, from a cumulative total of ¥1.2tn at FY2023. Through investments, we will contribute to the transition toward the reduction of GHG emissions and the realization of a decarbonized society.
In addition to the monetary target, we have set a target of increasing the annual GHG reduction contribution from investments to 2.4mn tons CO2e by FY2026 as an impact target indicator in order to expand the positive impact of our investments. We will promote the disclosure of impact indicators through engagement with our investees and other means, and will work to advance other methods for measuring environmental and social impact.
Launching of DL Sustainability Finance Frameworks
https://www.dai-ichi-life.co.jp/english/news_ release/2023/pdf/index_011.pdf
79
Sustainability & Foundation
Reduction of GHG emissions from the investment portfolios
Dai-ichi Life and Dai-ichi Frontier Life have set an interim target*22 | levels), and are proceeding ahead of schedule toward the 2025 |
of reducing GHG emissions in their portfolios by 50% by 2030 | target. We believe this is due to a combination of factors, including |
(compared with 2020), in addition to their 2025 goals*23, as part of | the progress of GHG emission reduction efforts by our portfolio |
their efforts to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. | companies and market fluctuations that affect the calculation of |
In 2023, Dai-ichi Life and Dai-ichi Frontier Life achieved | GHG emissions allocated to the two companies. |
reductions of 31% and 34%, respectively (compared with 2020 |
|
Absolute emissions |
| Dai-ichi Life: Listed equities, |
| Dai-ichi Life: Corporate loans (left axis) | Intensity | |||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
(10,000 tCO2e) |
| corporate bonds, and real estate (left axis) |
| (tCO2e/million yen) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
2,000 |
|
|
|
| Dai-ichi Frontier Life: Corporate bonds (right axis) |
|
|
| 1.5 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
1.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| 1.16 | 1.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustainability thematic investments*24 | Target: |
ca. ¥2.5tn | ca. ¥5.0tn |
(ca. ¥2tn by Dai-ichi Life and ¥0.5tn by Dai-ichi Frontier Life)
Environmental and climate solution investments*25 |
|
ca. ¥1.2tn | Target: |
(ca. ¥0.9tn by Dai-ichi Life and ¥0.3tn by Dai-ichi Frontier Life) | ca. ¥2.5tn |
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
| 2023 | 2026 | 2029 | FY |
| Positive impact via investments |
| 1.83mn tons | 2.4mn tons | Target: |
| ||
| Annual GHG reduction contribution* | 26 | CO e | CO e |
| |||
|
|
|
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
|
Engagement with investees
80
Sustainability & Foundation
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
| (15%) |
|
|
|
|
|
| (34%)* |
| 0.99 |
|
| |
1,281 |
|
|
|
| 1.0 | ||||
|
|
|
|
| 0.84 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 1,080 | 1,018 |
|
| (50%) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.64 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| 890 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
745 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| 608 | 569 |
| (31%) | 641 |
| 0.5 |
|
|
|
| 510 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dai-ichi Life and Dai-ichi Frontier Life promote the formulation and implementation of net-zero strategies for their portfolio companies through ongoing engagement with the top 50 GHG emitters in their investment portfolios.
In addition, to strengthen our climate change engagement, we have set reduction levels (emission intensity targets) to aim for in the electricity and steel sectors, which account for a large share
of the investment portfolio emissions. The levels are set based on the net-zero scenario required for each industry and the status of each company. By actively engaging with investees while utilizing these indicators, we will support and promote GHG emission reduction efforts by our portfolio companies, thereby contributing to the realization of a decarbonized society.
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | listed equities, corporate bonds, | )(25%) |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| real estate, corporate loans |
|
| Net Zero | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
| 537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | (29%) | ) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 472 |
| 450 |
| 380 |
| listed equities, |
| 403 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| corporate bonds, |
|
|
|
|
| ||
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| real estate |
|
|
|
| 0 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2020 |
| 2021 | 2022 |
| 2023 |
|
|
|
|
| 2025 | 2030 | 2050 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interim target | Interim target |
|
|
Note: Dai-ichi Frontier Life’s reduction rate from 2021, the base year for the 2025 interim target, is (27%).
*22 Corporate loans were added to the subject assets for Dai-ichi Life.
*23 Dai-ichi Life: 25% reduction; Dai-ichi Frontier Life: 15% reduction (intensity basis). Subject assets are listed equities, corporate bonds, and real estate portfolio for Dai-ichi Life, and corporate bonds for Dai-ichi Frontier Life. The base year is as of March 2020 for Dai-ichi Life and as of March 2021 for Dai-ichi Frontier Life (2025 target only; 2030 target is the same base year as Dai-ichi Life)
Environmental and
climate solution
investments
Engagement activities
Realization of
- decarbonized society
Strengthen |
initiatives |
Clarifying the required levels for each sector - well below 2°C and aiming for a level of 1.5°C -
Sector | Level to aim for in 2030*27 |
Electricity | 186–255g/kWh*28 |
Steel | (16%) (compared with 2020)*29 |
*24 Renamed from ESG-themed investments
*25 Renamed from climate change solution investments
*26 Projects for which estimates can be made from the amount of electricity generated in renewable energy power generation projects, etc. (calculated in accordance with PCAF standards), and projects for which data is disclosed in green bonds, etc. (Some of the measurement results include data provided by ICE Data Services.)
*27 Developed with reference to the IEA NZE and APS scenarios. Reviewed as appropriate based on changes in the external environment and updates to the net-zero scenario.
*28 Based on data held by Dai-ichi Life (as of 2020), the actual performance of the electricity sector is 402 g/kWh. *29 The unit for the steel sector is emission intensity (emissions per ton of crude steel produced).
Dai-ichi Life Holdings Integrated Report 2024
Sustainability & Foundation
- Natural Capital Initiatives -
Nature-related portfolio analysis
The following analysis was conducted in accordance with the LEAP approach*30 proposed by the TNFD to identify nature-related risks and opportunities.
Introduction | Purpose & | Messages to Our | Value Creation | Strategy & | Sustainability & | Governance | Data |
| Values | Stakeholders |
| Business | Foundation |
|
|
Environmental Leadership
Figure 2: Priority areas and high-riskitems Tools used: ENCORE*33, WWF risk filter (Biodiversity and Water)
Priority Area No. | 1 |
| 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
|
| ○ |
| ○ | ○ | ○ |
| ○ |
| ○ |
|
Sector |
| Materials |
|
| Utilities |
|
| |||
Business/ | Metals & Minerals/Mining | Solar power | Hydroelectric power generation |
| Wind power | (Reference) | ||||
Process | generation |
| generation | Analysis tools | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Company name |
| Company A | Company B | Company C |
| Company D |
|
| ||
Location | Philippines |
| Philippines | Hiroshima Pref. | Gifu Pref. |
| Tochigi Pref. | Shizuoka Pref. |
| |
Dependent | Groundwater, surface water, water quantity |
| Surface water, water quantity maintenance, |
|
| |||||
ecosystem | Climate control | climate control, mass stabilization and erosion | Ventilation | ENCORE |
In the previous year, we conducted a nature-related risk analysis of the domestic equity portfolio of Dai-ichi Life, the Group’s core domestic subsidiary, and identified three high-risk sectors: “consumer staples,” “materials,” and “utilities.” This year, we selected 10 companies and 30 business locations from the three high-risk sectors taking into account their importance to Dai-ichi Life and their dependence on and
impact on natural capital. For these 30 locations, we evaluated their interfaces with nature based on the four definitions of sensitive locations proposed by the LEAP approach (Figure 1). As a result, we identified four domestic locations and two overseas locations as high overall risk (priority areas).
services | maintenance, climate control |
| control, flood and storm control |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |||
Factors | Interference with daily life, freshwater ecosystem use, |
|
|
|
|
| |
GHG emissions, non-GHG air pollution, soil pollutants, | Terrestrial ecosystem | Freshwater ecosystem use, soil pollutants, terrestrial | Marine ecosystem use, |
| |||
impacting on | ENCORE | ||||||
solid waste, terrestrial ecosystem use, water pollutants, | use, water use | ecosystem use, water pollutants, water use | terrestrial ecosystem use | ||||
nature |
| ||||||
water use |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| [Reputational risk] | [Reputational risk] | [Reputational risk] | [Reputational risk] | [Reputational risk] | [Reputational risk] |
|
| Deterioration of | Deterioration of corporate | Deterioration of | Deterioration of | Deterioration of | Deterioration of |
|
| corporate reputation | reputation due to | corporate reputation | corporate reputation | corporate reputation | corporate reputation |
|
| due to conflicts over | negative impacts on local | due to threats to healthy | due to threats to healthy | due to threats to healthy | due to threats to healthy |
|
| limited water resources | environmental assets | ecosystems in the | ecosystems in the | ecosystems in the | ecosystems in the |
|
| and negative news | (protected areas and key | surrounding waters | surrounding waters | surrounding waters | surrounding waters |
|
|
| biodiversity areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
| [Physical risks] | [Reputational risk] | [Physical risks] | [Physical risks] | [Physical risks] | [Physical risks] |
|
| Occurrence and | Deterioration of | Occurrence and | Occurrence and | Impact of flooding on | Occurrence and |
|
| increased intensity | corporate reputation | increased intensity | increased intensity | businesses and value | increased intensity |
|
81
Sustainability & Foundation
*30 Acronym for Locate (locate interface with nature), Evaluate (evaluate dependencies and impacts), Assess (assess risks and opportunities), and Prepare (prepare to respond to risks and opportunities and report). The aim of the LEAP approach is to enable companies and financial institutions to assess nature-related risks and opportunities. This year, we focused our descriptions on the Locate, Evaluate, and Assess phases.
Figure 1: Interfaces with nature at portfolio company business locations |
|
| Tools used: IBAT, Global Forest Watch (GFW), Aqueduct | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector | Consumer staples |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Utilities |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| toolsAnalysis |
| Crops & food/ |
| Industrial | Aluminum/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Metals & | Metals/Fabrication | Solar power | Biomass | Hydroelectric | generationpowerWind | generationpowerNuclear | |||||||||||||||||
Business/Process |
| gases/ |
|
|
| Copper/Mining |
|
|
|
| minerals/ |
| power |
| power |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
|
| Refining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| generation |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mining |
|
| generation | generation |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (Reference) | |
| Pref.Gunma | Pref.Hokkaido | Pref.Nagano | Pref.Niigata | Pref.Hokkaido |
| Pref.Ibaraki |
| Pref.Tochigi | Pref.Shizuoka | Pref.Osaka | Pref.Kagawa | FukushimaPref. | US | Peru | Chile | Australia |
| China | Philippines | Philippines |
| CaledoniaNew | Indonesia | Pref.Iwate | Pref.Hiroshima | Pref.Kagawa | Pref.Hiroshima | Pref.Aichi | Pref.Gifu | Pref.Tochigi |
| Pref.Gunma | Pref.Shizuoka | Pref.Shizuoka | ||
Location No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 |
| |
Location Address*31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Areas important for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IBAT, |
biodiversity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GFW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Areas of high ecosystem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GFW |
integrity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Areas of rapid decline in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GFW |
ecosystem integrity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Areas of high physical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Aqueduct |
water risks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Overall risk assessment*32 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 4 |
| 6 |
| 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| 5 | 12 | 12 |
| 6 | 8 | 9 | 11 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 10 |
| 8 | 10 | 9 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31 Analyzed based on the address information of each location. For disclosure, shown up to the name of the prefecture in Japan and up to the name of the country in overseas *32 Calculation method for overall risk assessment
• The risk level of each of the 30 locations is scored according to each of the four definitions of sensitive locations high risk: 3 points , medium risk: 2 points , and low risk: 1 point .
- In the overall risk assessment, X<7 is considered to have a low overall risk rating, 7≤X<10 is considered to have a medium overall risk rating, and 10≤X is considered to have a high overall risk rating (priority areas).
Major risk items*34 | of natural disasters | due to political climate, | of natural disasters | of natural disasters | chains | of natural disasters | WWF Risk Filter |
| due to degradation of | media coverage, | due to degradation of | due to degradation of |
| due to degradation of | (Biodiversity and Water) |
| ecosystem services | international interest in | ecosystem services | ecosystem services |
| ecosystem services |
|
|
| a particular region |
|
|
|
|
|
| [Reputational risk] | [Reputational risk] | [Physical risks] | [Physical risks] | [Physical risks] | [Physical risks] |
|
| Deterioration of corporate | Deterioration of | Impact of flooding on | Impact of flooding on | Occurrence and | Impact of flooding on |
|
| reputation due to negative | corporate reputation | businesses and value | businesses and value | increased intensity | businesses and value |
|
| impacts on local | due to infringing on | chains | chains | of natural disasters | chains |
|
| environmental assets | water resources that |
|
| due to degradation of |
|
|
| (protected areas and key | are culturally important |
|
| ecosystem services |
|
|
| biodiversity areas) | to local communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| and indigenous peoples |
|
|
|
|
|
*33 A nature-related risk analysis tool developed by the Natural Capital Finance Alliance (NCFA), an international financial industry association for the natural capital sector, and others. The current version as of June 2024 was used.
*34 The top three risks identified by the WWF risk filter are listed in descending order of risk. Of the risk items, indicates WWF risk filter (Biodiversity) and indicates WWF risk filter (Water).
In this analysis, we attempted to analyze nature-related risks from | engagement with investees and lead to a more resilient portfolio of |
a geographical perspective, using not only the business activities | investments in the future. We will continue to contribute to nature |
of the companies but also the address information of their | positivity by utilizing these kinds of nature-related risks analysis in |
business locations. We believe that based on the knowledge | our engagement and analysis of our investments. |
gained from this analysis, we will help improve the quality of our |
|
TOPICS
Joint research with Mizuho–DL Financial Technology Co., Ltd.
To more precisely understand the risks of portfolio companies related to natural capital, we conducted an additional analysis on a trial basis, utilizing Sustainability Scores*35, which were developed independently by Mizuho-DL Financial Technology, based on disclosed information of the companies.
First, among the domestic stock portfolio of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dai-ichi Life, ca. 200 companies in the three sectors of |
| Figure 3: Investment percentage by adjusted risk score | ||||||||||||
consumer staples, materials, and utilities, which were |
|
| By Factor | |||||||||||
identified as high risk in our previous year’s analysis, |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Water use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
were targeted. ENCORE*36 was then used to calculate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 9% | Other resource |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
risk scores by sub-industry for each factor (impact driver) |
|
| use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Terrestrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
of corporate activities affecting nature. Each risk score |
| 28% | ecosystem use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Freshwater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
was supplemented by factor-specific Sustainability |
|
| ecosystem use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| Marine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Score, which evaluate the sustainability efforts of each |
|
| ecosystem use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
3% | 57% | GHG emissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
company, to refine the risk scores for each individual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Non-GHG |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
company (Figure 3). The analysis showed that while | 2% |
| air pollutants |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| Water pollutants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
more than half of the companies were rated as “Very |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
Sustainability & Foundation
We analyzed the dependence on and impact of nature on the operations and processes taking place in the six sites in priority areas identified in the Locate phase (Figure 2). The analysis showed that in the six identified locations, there is a significant dependence on ecosystem services such as climate control, surface water, and water quantity maintenance, which impact nature through terrestrial ecosystem use, water use, and freshwater ecosystem use. Analysis of risks related to natural capital based on address information and business/processes
showed that, overall, reputational risks related to biodiversity and water tended to be high (Figure 2). We understand that this indicates that there is a high risk that the our business activities could adversely affect the lives of local residents, thereby negatively impacting our reputation. In terms of physical risks, the risk of natural disasters such as flooding and degradation of ecosystem services was assessed as high, reaffirming the importance of promoting appropriate management and use of natural capital to manage such risks.
Low” or “Low” risk, some remained at high risk and |
|
|
|
|
|
| Soil pollutants | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Solid waste |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
required caution. In addition, the risk was particularly |
| Very High |
| High |
|
| Disturbances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Medium |
| Low |
| Very Low |
|
|
| ||||
high for factors (impact drivers) such as water use, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
GHG emissions, and solid waste.
In this analysis, we attempted to evaluate risks based not only on the nature of a company’s business but also on the status of each company’s sustainability initiatives. We will continue to conduct this kind of trial analysis in the future as we work to identify natural capital–related risks and opportunities more precisely.
*35 The scores were developed with the aim of identifying risks and opportunities for companies from a sustainability perspective. They are compiled based on various sustainability themes, which can be linked to impact drivers in ENCORE to enable a company-specific risk analysis of the portfolio.
*36 The current version as of April 2024 was used.
Dai-ichi Life Holdings Integrated Report 2024
Sustainability & Foundation
Initiatives and Opinions on Climate Change Issues
Introduction | Purpose & | Messages to Our | Value Creation | Strategy & | Sustainability & | Governance | Data |
| Values | Stakeholders |
| Business | Foundation |
|
|
Environmental Leadership
Initiatives to | Proactive Governance and Engagement |
| |
Respect Human Rights |
|
|
Realizing a sustainable society is a strong aspiration of the Dai-ichi Life Group. Among many issues to tackle, addressing climate
supporting the development and effective implementation of net-zero transition plans across the financial industry, mobilizing
- Basic Policy
change has become an urgent issue that requires engagement across the entire business community. Through its participation in GFANZ, the world’s largest coalition of financial institutions with a net-zero commitment (more than 675 financial institutions in 50 countries as of the end of 2023), and NZAOA, a member-led initiative of institutional investors, we are expanding the circle of financial institutions addressing climate change issues, while contributing to the international rulemaking to realize a decarbonized society.
capital for emerging markets and developing economies, and policy advocacy. In June 2023, the Japan Chapter of GFANZ was launched as the first national chapter, and our Chair of the Board, Seiji Inagaki, served as the first chair of its Consultative Group. We believe that our participation in these international initiatives is extremely important, not only from the perspective of communicating Asian or Japanese views to the world and enhancing the presence of the Dai-ichi Life Group but also contributing to the industry-wide decarbonization efforts by sharing
The Dai-ichi Life Group has established the Human Rights Policy of the Dai-ichi Life Group in accordance with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. In addition, the Dai-ichi Life Group Code of Conduct stipulates “respect for human rights” as an element of “foundational conduct.”
The Group will promptly grasp trends on human rights from the international community and have a correct understanding of human rights principles, initiatives, and guidelines. In addition, we
continue to endeavor to develop employees who always think of others when taking action in any situation.
We will aim to become a company deeply rooted in the value of “respect for human rights” in the pursuit of human happiness.
The Human Rights Policy of Dai-ichi Life Group
https://www.dai-ichi-life-hd.com/en/ sustainability/initiatives/rights.html
To realize its objective of “accelerating the global net-zero transition,” GFANZ works in various areas. These include
the knowledge we have gained with domestic financial institutions.
- Promoting human rights due diligence
- Recent Major Events
|
| Date |
| Event | |
|
|
| June | GFANZ Japan Chapter Launched |
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| October | PRI in Person (Tokyo) |
| |
|
|
|
| ||
| GFANZ side event, participation in panel discussions by the Group executives | ||||
Sustainability | 2023 |
| |||
|
|
| |||
November | GFANZ APAC Seminar (Singapore) |
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Presentation of the Group’s transition plan |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| December | COP28 (Dubai, UAE) |
| |
& |
|
|
| GFANZ Japan Chapter organized a session on “Financing the Transition of High-Emitting Industries” at the Japan Pavilion | |
Foundation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| March | First GFANZ Japan Summit |
| |
|
| GFANZ Japan Chapter Statement Released |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Ministry of the Environment High Level Panel | Materials and videos | |
|
|
| March | on ESG Finance | |
|
|
| Introduced GFANZ’s efforts to | https://www.env.go.jp/page_01292.html | |
|
|
|
| ||
| 2024 |
| transition to a net-zero economy |
| |
|
|
|
| ||
| April | BDTI Webinar | BDTI webinar video | ||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| Disseminated information | https://youtu.be/ | |
|
|
|
| about GFANZ Japan Chapter activities | xrQBEXw4UCE?si=07KQomkS0e8ddczJ |
May | IIF Insurance Colloquium |
Joined panel to introduce our sustainability initiatives | |
|
PRI in Person(Tokyo) | First GFANZ Japan |
Summit |
The Dai-ichi Life Group is committed to respecting the human rights of all stakeholders involved in its business activities across the board, including the supply chain, in accordance with the following steps in the human rights due diligence process.
Dai-ichi Life example: Human rights due diligence initiative
2. | Identification and |
|
| 3. | Initiatives to | 84 |
impact assessment of | Human rights due diligence | mitigate human rights | ||||
human rights risks | risks | Sustainability& | ||||
|
| Development of our policy |
|
| ||
5. | Disclosing initiatives and | 1. to respect human rights |
| Reflecting on |
| |
applying opinions |
|
| 4. and assessing initiatives | Foundation | ||
To promote human rights due diligence, the following promotion structure has been established within the Group. | ||||||
| ||||||
|
| Human Rights Due Diligence Promotion Structure |
|
| ||
| Group Sustainability Committee | Group Human Rights Awareness Committee |
| |||
Committee | Chief Sustainability Officer |
| Chief Human Resources Officer |
| ||
Chair |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Committee | Appointed executive officers |
| Appointed department managers |
| ||
members |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Meeting | Generally four times a year or as necessary |
| Generally once a year or as necessary |
| ||
Frequency |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussion | Sharing awareness regarding environmental changes and issues | Sharing awareness regarding environmental changes, the status of |
| |||
related to sustainability, including human rights, reflecting on | group initiatives, and issues related to raising awareness of human |
| ||||
items |
| |||||
initiatives, and formulating response measures | rights, and formulating response measures |
| ||||
|
|
Human rights due diligence initiatives
https://www.dai-ichi-life-hd.com/en/sustainability/initiatives/rights.html
- Publication of the Human Rights Report
We have disclosed our efforts to respect human rights on our website, and produced and published the new Human Rights Report as a more detailed accounting of these efforts in June 2024. The report is available on our website.
Human Rights Report 2024
https://www.dai-ichi-life-hd.com/en/sustainability/initiatives/pdf/rights_001.pdf
Dai-ichi Life Holdings Integrated Report 2024
Sustainability & Foundation
Introduction | Purpose & | Messages to Our | Value Creation | Strategy & | Sustainability & | Governance | Data |
| Values | Stakeholders |
| Business | Foundation |
|
|
Proactive Governance and Engagement
Human Resources Strategy
Under our new Group Human Resources Strategy, we aim to continuously enhance corporate value by harnessing the diverse talents of each individual.
Finally, corporate culture and well-being are important foundations of the Group’s HR Strategy. The Group will further promote diverse work styles along with health and productivity management to create an open and dynamic corporate culture in which all organizations are full of diversity, and where all employees can flourish with vitality and peace of mind.
In this rapidly changing environment, the driving force for the Group’s growth is our human resources, and we will implement the HR Strategy based on the belief that the diversity and expertise of each and every employee is our most important management resource. In addition, through individual measures based on the five pillars, we will maximize the potential of the Group’s HR, leverage diversity as a strength, and strive to achieve the sustainable enhancement of corporate value.
Executive Officer Chief Human Resources Officer
Our commitment to employees
Yotaro Numata
Vision
Empowering diverse human resources to maximize their potential, driving challenges and transformation.
Message from the CHRO
In a complex and changing business environment, human resources are the driving force to execute management strategies and realize our purpose. The Dai-ichi Life Group has been committed to the brand message of “By your side, for life” for more than 100 years, and this sentiment is expressed in our Employee Philosophy Statement, and shared with Group companies around the world. To realize a world in which all employees can thrive and demonstrate their individuality, and to further enhance our corporate value, we are working to develop human resources, strategically assign human resources, and foster a corporate
The Dai-ichi Life Group Employee Philosophy Statement
Growth is not a solo endeavor.
As over 100 years of experience has taught us,
growth comes from belonging to something bigger than ourselves.
At Dai-ichi Life Group, we are by your side, growing with you.
Challenging you. Supporting you to prosper.
Protecting the well-being of all, now and for the future. Wherever you are with us, and wherever you go in our group, we work together to open up a world of opportunities.
85
My name is Yotaro Numata, and I was appointed Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) in April 2024. Starting this fiscal year, Dai-ichi Life Holdings created the position of CHRO to improve employee satisfaction and create opportunities for diverse human resources to unleash their potential, while consolidating the
Group HR | Personnel systems |
Compensation | |
governance | |
systems | |
|
Group HR |
Strategy |
culture in which diverse human resources can maximize their potential.
| Status of human capital enhancement |
| 86 |
| |||
|
|
Sustainability & Foundation
previously dispersed planning functions for personnel and compensation systems, recruitment, and other aspects under the holding company, Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.
The biggest objective of the HR Strategy is to promote initiatives throughout the human resources life cycle, including recruitment, talent development, compensation, and benefits. The strategy also seeks to expand and enhance opportunities for employees to succeed through the promotion of DE&I (diversity, equity, and inclusion), to foster an organizational culture
that includes health and productivity management, and to drive measures related to employee well-being. We believe that this approach will contribute to realizing the Group’s management and business strategies.
In March 2024, we launched our new mid-term management plan, and in line with this plan, we also renewed our Group HR Strategy. First, we defined the key message that forms the backbone of the Human Resources Strategy: “Empowering diverse human resources to maximize their potential, driving challenges and transformation.” To become a global top-tier insurance group
Talent acquisition | Opportunities for |
Talent development | success |
Fostering a flat and open corporate culture, and improving employee well-being
Group HR governance will look at the Group as a whole and allocate human resources where they are needed to further business strategies, as well as review the succession plans of each Group company from the perspective of stable business continuity.
In terms of opportunities for success, we aim to create an organization with the strength and flexibility to realize sustainable enhancement of corporate value by encouraging motivated employees to take on challenges autonomously, and by proactively providing opportunities for them to succeed.
In the areas of talent acquisition and development, to support extending our business domains, including entry into non-insurance areas and overseas business expansion, we will strategically develop new graduate recruitment, mid-career hiring, and in-house
Five pillars of
HR strategy
Group HR governance
Talent acquisition and development
Personnel and
compensation systems
Opportunities
for success
Corporate culture and well-being
Progress index*5
Human capital shift
(including natural attrition)
Number of core DX talent*1
Number of candidates for future global management leaders
Number of global job-postingpositions (cumulative)
My Career program applicants
Percentage of female executives*2
Percentage of
female organizational heads*3
Uptake rate/number of days of childcare leave taken
by male employees*4
Percentage completing secondary medical exams
| April 2022 |
| April 2023 | April 2024 | Target (April 2025) | Connection | |||||||||||||
|
| to corporate value creation | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 682ppl |
| 1,211 | ppl |
| 2,016ppl |
|
| ca.2,600ppl |
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| 100ppl |
| 254ppl |
| 353 | ppl |
| 850ppl |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Implement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 241ppl |
|
|
| 286ppl |
| 314ppl |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| business |
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| strategies | The Dai-ichi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 8 |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
| 26 |
|
|
| 40 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Life Group | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| that is |
302 | ppl |
| 371ppl |
|
| 411ppl |
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| continuously | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| chosen by |
|
| 12.1% |
|
|
| 13.4% |
|
| 13.7% |
|
| 30% | Organizational | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| customers | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (2030) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| culture that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| thrives on |
|
|
| 16.5% |
|
|
| 18.5 |
|
|
| 19.1 |
|
|
| 30% |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| % |
|
| % |
|
| diversity |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (2030) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 92.3% |
|
|
| 100% |
|
| 100% |
|
| 100% |
|
| |||||
| 11.8 days |
|
| 21.5 days |
| 23.1days |
| 1 month | Employee |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| well-being |
|
|
| 85.7% |
|
|
| 87.6 | % |
|
| 87.6 | % |
|
| 100% |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustainability & Foundation
and a leader of the Japanese insurance industry future which is our vision for FY2030, each and every employee of the Group must take on daily challenges and maximize their capacity to transform both themselves and the organization. We have incorporated this strong sentiment into our key message and have made it the cornerstone of our HR Strategy. Based on this key message, the Group HR Strategy will develop measures based on five pillars.
appointments, as well as implement a wide range of training measures to enhance the expertise of our employees, the source of our corporate value creation.
In our personnel and compensation systems, we aim to elicit a sense of growth and fulfillment from employees through fair evaluation and performance-based compensation. We strive so that employees can directly experience the impact that their daily efforts have on corporate value.
*1 Fundamental reform of the DX talent development program was implemented | *4 The total for Dai-ichi Life Holdings, its three domestic life insurance companies, |
starting in FY2024. Results as of April 2024 are based on the previous definition of | and ipet Insurance. Calculated in accordance with the calculation standards for |
DX talent development. The target is the total number of employees in Phase 1 | the ratio of childcare leave taken, etc. required to be disclosed under the revised |
and 2 (see P.92) based on the new definition of DX human resource development. | Child Care and Family Care Leave Act (effective April 2023) (if the result exceeds |
*2 The total for Dai-ichi Life Holdings and Dai-ichi Life | 100%, it is indicated as 100%). |
*3 The total number of general managers and line managers, which are the | *5 The total for Dai-ichi Life Holdings and its three domestic life insurance companies |
organizational leaders among the management-level positions at Dai-ichi Life | excluding the number of global job postings, figure of *2 and *4 |
Holdings and its three domestic life insurance companies (Dai-ichi Life, Dai-ichi |
|
Frontier Life, and Neo First Life) |
|
Dai-ichi Life Holdings Integrated Report 2024
Sustainability & Foundation
Group human resources governance
Introduction | Purpose & | Messages to Our | Value Creation | Strategy & | Sustainability & | Governance | Data |
| Values | Stakeholders |
| Business | Foundation |
|
|
Proactive Governance and Engagement
Strengthening coordination with human resources departments at overseas Group companies
Allocating the right people in the right places to support business expansion
As a group that operates globally, we have formed task forces and working groups on specific themes with personnel in charge of human resources in each country in order to promote the
For example, we provide various measures for the next generation of Group leaders to acquire a global management perspective, and prepare tools for new employees that
In addition to the promotion of the domestic protection business and the asset formation/succession business, the Group is extending its business domains by further expanding its overseas business and entering into non-insurance areas. In Group HR governance, we acquire the human resources and capabilities necessary to execute our business strategies, flexibly allocate human resources to focus areas, and strengthen cooperation with
Group companies. By strengthening the Group’s governance through optimal allocation of human capital and acquiring new perspectives, the HR Strategy is closely linked to each business strategy even in a rapidly changing business environment, and we are developing various measures to maximize the potential of our human resources.
advancement of Group management from the aspect of human resources. These meeting bodies regularly engage in dialogue on a wide range of topics, such as the development of future management-level personnel and philosophy sharing, with the aim of creating synergies across countries, and have contributed to the growth of the entire Group through the implementation of numerous group-wide measures.
communicate the Group’s history, philosophy, and other qualities so that each employee can feel that they are a part of the Group.
In addition, to instill our philosophy throughout the Group, we have formed a working group on the theme of DE&I in different countries, and plan and operate a DE&I Summit, which will be described later.
Appointment of external human resources as executive officers
87
Sustainability & Foundation
Since 2007, the Group has made a full-scale entry into the overseas life insurance business, and has continuously challenged and transformed itself in response to changes in the business environment, including demutualization and listing in 2010, and the transition to a holding company structure in 2016. In recent years, the environment surrounding the Group has been changing even more quickly with the rapid evolution of digital technology and generative AI, the emergence of geopolitical risks in various parts of the world, and increasing uncertainty in macroeconomic and financial markets. In such a business environment, it is essential to utilize human resources who can contribute to value creation beyond the boundaries of gender, age, nationality, and so on, so
that the Group can achieve growth as a global top-tier insurance group by FY2030.
To build a strong governance structure to support Group management, we are strengthening our efforts to diversify our human resources by appointing outside talent as executive officers. Starting with the appointment of Senior Managing Executive Officer Stephen Barnham as Chief Information Officer and Chief Digital Officer in 2023, we have continued to develop an environment that strengthens governance and drives innovation from a personnel perspective by securing a diverse range of highly specialized human resources, including welcoming a Chief Compliance Officer, a Chief Communications Officer, and in FY2024, a Chief Data and AI Officer.
Allocating human resources aligned with business strategy
We will implement a strategic shift of about 3,400 human |
| and outside the Group to assume key roles at Dai-ichi Life |
| ||
resources by FY2026 to realize the business strategies of |
| Holdings, which steers the entire Group. |
| ||
each Group company and to build a foundation that will enable |
| In addition, career rotations as a strategic shift of human |
| ||
diverse human resources to realize their full potential. We are |
| resources play a part as investments in cross-boundary learning |
| ||
committed to promoting the optimal allocation of diverse and |
| for employees. The skills and experience acquired by employees |
| ||
specialized human resources across various areas to enhance |
| who have had career rotations will be utilized to realize business |
| ||
the business efficiency and profitability of Dai-ichi Life |
| strategies and enhance corporate value at Group companies. | 88 | ||
Insurance. This includes rotating personnel into expanding |
| Furthermore, career rotations contribute to ensuring the |
| ||
| |||||
Sustainability & | |||||
business areas such as digital technology and international |
| sustainability of local communities and society as such staff take | |||
operations along with new businesses including ipet and |
| part in solving social issues through dispatch to local governments | |||
Benefit One, and bringing in human resources from both inside |
| and other organizations. | |||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Employee voices |
|
|
| Foundation |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Benefit One |
| Fukui City Government | ||
|
|
| |||
| Sales Promotion Department, |
| General Affairs Department, |
|
Stephen Barnham | Webster Coates | Kyoko Wada | Figen Ulgen |
Chief Information Officer and | Chief Compliance Officer | Chief Communications Officer | Chief Data and AI Officer |
Chief Digital Officer |
|
|
|
Governance for overseas Group companies
Sales Office | Ai Yamamoto | Future Creation Promotion | Mika Tsubota |
|
|
| Bureau |
At my current workplace, I am in charge of | |||
|
|
| |
I applied to this program because I wanted to help | |||
promoting efforts to create synergies between | |||
the Dai-ichi Life Group and Benefit One. Through | women who are trying their best to balance work | ||
service proposals for Benefit Station, efforts to | and family life. Currently, I am in charge of organizing | ||
increase utilization rates among companies and organizations that | social events for working women, disseminating information about role | ||
have already implemented Benefit Station, and the provision of new | models on social media, improving the workplace environment including |
The Group has established compensation guidelines for the CEOs of overseas Group companies and ensures fair and competitive compensation based on the Group mid-term management plan, each company’s business stage, market standards, and other factors. This approach aims to promote value sharing with shareholders and recruit and retain talented CEOs who will drive the Group’s growth. Operating under these guidelines, we ensure transparency and fairness in compensation levels and decision- making processes, while respecting local regulations, market practices, and the authority of the decision-making bodies of Group companies.
From the perspective of Group human resource governance, we recognize the critical importance of managing succession plans for the top management at subsidiaries. We assist our overseas Group companies in developing succession plans for key management personnel and centrally manage these plans. Each company identifies candidates at an early stage and trains them to ensure stability and continuity of management. In particular with regard to CEO successors, we are deeply involved in the selection process as the parent company, including interviewing candidates, and work together with subsidiaries to ensure smooth successions.
products and services through the platform, we hope to help solve | promoting male employee childcare leave and improved engagement, |
issues and enhance the value of experiences for companies and | and projects related to career design for students. I feel that my outlook |
organizations. We will boldly take on the challenge of new initiatives | has been greatly broadened by listening to the voices of corporate |
as a unified Group, aiming for value propositions that go beyond the | executives, working women, and students, and by recognizing the need |
insurance domain. | to conduct business while communicating with people outside the |
| government based on multiple perspectives, such as raising awareness, |
| improving the workplace environment, and promoting the sharing of |
| household and childcare responsibilities. I would like to leverage this |
| experience to solve various issues and create an environment where |
| everyone can work in their own way in the future. |
Dai-ichi Life Holdings Integrated Report 2024
Disclaimer
Dai-ichi Life Holdings Inc. published this content on September 29, 2024 and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on September 30, 2024 at 00:02:04 UTC.

















