Joint Fighter Jet Project: Paris and Berlin Attempt to "Save Face"
As tensions persist between Dassault Aviation and Airbus, France and Germany are considering a transitional legal solution for the FCAS program, despite mounting doubts over its viability.
The Future Combat Air System (FCAS) project remains a major sticking point between Paris and Berlin. This morning, AlphaValue analysts report that the German and French governments now appear ready to establish a Dutch legal entity to house the project, "while privately asserting that the project is doomed to failure."
According to analysts, this move would push the deadline beyond May 2027, when France will have a new president and, potentially, new strategic directions. "In short, a face-saving maneuver," the broker summarized.
As a reminder, the project's lack of progress stems from heavy friction between industrial partners Dassault Aviation and Airbus, who are locked in a dispute over project leadership.
Furthermore, Paris and Berlin have divergent requirements for the future combat aircraft. France requires a jet capable of carrying nuclear warheads while remaining light enough for carrier-based operations, whereas Germany favors a larger aircraft capable of carrying a heavier payload.
"I repeat, Airbus does not wish to collaborate with Dassault. I understand that; Airbus wants to work alone [...]. I do not know if they received a request from Germany that prompted these statements, but yes, this project is at a standstill. It is complex," stated Eric Trappier, CEO of Dassault Aviation, during the group's quarterly results presentation.
For his part, Airbus CEO Guillaume Faury acknowledged the persistent deadlock, which he attributed to "differing expectations between partners regarding governance and the definition of leadership and cooperation."
This morning, Dassault Aviation shares are trading flat, while Airbus is up 0.4%.
Airbus SE is No. 1 in Europe and No. 2 worldwide in the aeronautics, aerospace, and defense industries. Net sales break down by family of products and services as follows:
- commercial aircraft (70.1%). The group is No. 1 worldwide for aircrafts with more than 100 seats;
- defense and aerospace systems (18.2%): military aircrafts (primarily transport aircrafts, marine surveillance aircrafts, anti-submarines fighter planes and flight refueling aircrafts), spatial equipment (orbital launchers, observation and communication satellite, turboprop aircraft, etc.), defense and security systems (missile systems, electronic and telecommunications systems, etc.). Airbus SE also provides training and aircrafts maintenance services;
- civil and military helicopters (11.7%).
Net sales are distributed geographically as follows: Europe (40.8%), Asia-Pacific (28.0%), North America (17.7%), Middle East (9.0%), Latin America (2.7%), and Other (1.8%).
This super rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (4 months), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Investor
Investor
This super composite rating is the result of a weighted average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), EPS Revisions (1 year), and Visibility (Composite). We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Global
Global
This composite rating is the result of an average of the rankings based on the following ratings: Fundamentals (Composite), Valuation (Composite), Financial Estimates Revisions (Composite), Consensus (Composite) and Visibility (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 4 of these 5 ratings for the calculation to be carried out. We recommend that you carefully review the associated descriptions.
Quality
Quality
This composite rating is the result of an average of rankings based on the following ratings: Returns (Composite), Profitability (Composite) and Quality of Financial Reporting (Composite), and Financial Health (Composite). The company must be covered by at least 2 of these 3 ratings for the calculation to be performed. We recommend that you carefully read the associated descriptions.
ESG MSCI
ESG MSCI
The MSCI ESG score assesses a company’s environmental, social, and governance practices relative to its industry peers. Companies are rated from CCC (laggard) to AAA (leader). This rating helps investors incorporate sustainability risks and opportunities into their investment decisions.